Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?

This study investigates market reaction to a political event, which is the presidential election of Republic of Indonesia in 2014 by studying 387 publicly traded firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. It employs event study method to measure the information content of this event. By going deeper, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irwan Trinugroho, Aurio Fajrin, Sutaryo Sutaryo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (PPPM STIE) 2016-11-01
Series:Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.perbanas.ac.id/index.php/jebav/article/view/629
id doaj-c22c7f9ec509470f9b472da5f44b3d6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c22c7f9ec509470f9b472da5f44b3d6f2020-11-24T23:02:07ZengPusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (PPPM STIE)Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy2087-37352088-785X2016-11-0119217318010.14414/jebav.v19i2.629459Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?Irwan Trinugroho0Aurio Fajrin1Sutaryo Sutaryo2Universitas Sebelas MaretUniversitas Sebelas MaretUniversitas Sebelas MaretThis study investigates market reaction to a political event, which is the presidential election of Republic of Indonesia in 2014 by studying 387 publicly traded firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. It employs event study method to measure the information content of this event. By going deeper, this study looked at the effect difference between government controlled firms (partially privatized firms) and private firms. The results show that there was a significant abnormal return around the event date. The negative abnormal return one day before the election date, which was followed by rebounding one day after the event, indicate that investors consider that the election had been done well particularly with respect to the political stability and security. Moreover, this paper reveals that the effect of presidential election is more pronounced for government-controlled firms than private firms. Government controlled firms may be more susceptible to political event.https://journal.perbanas.ac.id/index.php/jebav/article/view/629market reactionevent studypolitical eventgovernment-controlled firmsabnormal return
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Irwan Trinugroho
Aurio Fajrin
Sutaryo Sutaryo
spellingShingle Irwan Trinugroho
Aurio Fajrin
Sutaryo Sutaryo
Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?
Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy
market reaction
event study
political event
government-controlled firms
abnormal return
author_facet Irwan Trinugroho
Aurio Fajrin
Sutaryo Sutaryo
author_sort Irwan Trinugroho
title Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?
title_short Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?
title_full Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?
title_fullStr Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?
title_full_unstemmed Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?
title_sort is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?
publisher Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (PPPM STIE)
series Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy
issn 2087-3735
2088-785X
publishDate 2016-11-01
description This study investigates market reaction to a political event, which is the presidential election of Republic of Indonesia in 2014 by studying 387 publicly traded firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. It employs event study method to measure the information content of this event. By going deeper, this study looked at the effect difference between government controlled firms (partially privatized firms) and private firms. The results show that there was a significant abnormal return around the event date. The negative abnormal return one day before the election date, which was followed by rebounding one day after the event, indicate that investors consider that the election had been done well particularly with respect to the political stability and security. Moreover, this paper reveals that the effect of presidential election is more pronounced for government-controlled firms than private firms. Government controlled firms may be more susceptible to political event.
topic market reaction
event study
political event
government-controlled firms
abnormal return
url https://journal.perbanas.ac.id/index.php/jebav/article/view/629
work_keys_str_mv AT irwantrinugroho istheeffectofapoliticaleventmorepronouncedforgovernmentcontrolledfirms
AT auriofajrin istheeffectofapoliticaleventmorepronouncedforgovernmentcontrolledfirms
AT sutaryosutaryo istheeffectofapoliticaleventmorepronouncedforgovernmentcontrolledfirms
_version_ 1725637279942180864