Is the effect of a political event more pronounced for government controlled firms?

This study investigates market reaction to a political event, which is the presidential election of Republic of Indonesia in 2014 by studying 387 publicly traded firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. It employs event study method to measure the information content of this event. By going deeper, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irwan Trinugroho, Aurio Fajrin, Sutaryo Sutaryo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (PPPM STIE) 2016-11-01
Series:Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.perbanas.ac.id/index.php/jebav/article/view/629
Description
Summary:This study investigates market reaction to a political event, which is the presidential election of Republic of Indonesia in 2014 by studying 387 publicly traded firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. It employs event study method to measure the information content of this event. By going deeper, this study looked at the effect difference between government controlled firms (partially privatized firms) and private firms. The results show that there was a significant abnormal return around the event date. The negative abnormal return one day before the election date, which was followed by rebounding one day after the event, indicate that investors consider that the election had been done well particularly with respect to the political stability and security. Moreover, this paper reveals that the effect of presidential election is more pronounced for government-controlled firms than private firms. Government controlled firms may be more susceptible to political event.
ISSN:2087-3735
2088-785X