Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services

We draw on the concept of ‘fit’ to understand how co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) as governance instruments could better acknowledge local social complexities. Achieving ‘participatory fit’ requires well-designed and fair processes, which enhance local acceptance towards the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarkki Simo, Rantala Lauri, Karjalainen Timo P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2015-01-01
Series:Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cass.2015.2.issue-1/cass-2015-0007/cass-2015-0007.xml?format=INT
id doaj-c22461812248403293ced39703a1bc86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c22461812248403293ced39703a1bc862020-11-25T00:40:32ZengDe GruyterChange and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems2300-36692015-01-012110.1515/cass-2015-0007cass-2015-0007Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem ServicesSarkki Simo0Rantala Lauri1Karjalainen Timo P.2University of Oulu Oulu, FinlandThule institute, University of Oulu, FinlandThule Institute, University of Oulu, FinlandWe draw on the concept of ‘fit’ to understand how co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) as governance instruments could better acknowledge local social complexities. Achieving ‘participatory fit’ requires well-designed and fair processes, which enhance local acceptance towards the implemented rules. Thus, such fit can contribute to establishing new institutions in conservation governance. However, previous literature on participation has had strong focus on properties of decision-making processes, which often neglects the question on how local realities effect on local people’s ability and willingness to participate in the work of governance instruments. We approach ‘participatory fit’ by identifying six properties of heterogeneous local social systems that governance instruments need to acknowledge to nurture balanced bottom-up participation: 1) economic resources and structures, 2) relationships to land, 3) level of education, 4) relationships between diverse actors, 5) divergent problem definitions, and 6) local identities. We discuss related sources of misfits and develop proposals on how conservation instruments could function as bridging organizations facilitating polycentric institutional structures that fit better to the social systems they are intended to govern. Such hybridization of governance could avoid pitfalls of considering one particular instrument (e.g. co-management or PES) as a panacea able to create win-win solutions.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cass.2015.2.issue-1/cass-2015-0007/cass-2015-0007.xml?format=INTPolycentric institutionsSocial justice of conservationsocial FitParticipatory fitLocal Heterogeneityco-managementPayments for Ecosystem Services
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarkki Simo
Rantala Lauri
Karjalainen Timo P.
spellingShingle Sarkki Simo
Rantala Lauri
Karjalainen Timo P.
Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services
Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems
Polycentric institutions
Social justice of conservation
social Fit
Participatory fit
Local Heterogeneity
co-management
Payments for Ecosystem Services
author_facet Sarkki Simo
Rantala Lauri
Karjalainen Timo P.
author_sort Sarkki Simo
title Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services
title_short Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services
title_full Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services
title_fullStr Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services
title_full_unstemmed Fit between Conservation Instruments and Local Social Systems: Cases of Co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services
title_sort fit between conservation instruments and local social systems: cases of co-management and payments for ecosystem services
publisher De Gruyter
series Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems
issn 2300-3669
publishDate 2015-01-01
description We draw on the concept of ‘fit’ to understand how co-management and Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) as governance instruments could better acknowledge local social complexities. Achieving ‘participatory fit’ requires well-designed and fair processes, which enhance local acceptance towards the implemented rules. Thus, such fit can contribute to establishing new institutions in conservation governance. However, previous literature on participation has had strong focus on properties of decision-making processes, which often neglects the question on how local realities effect on local people’s ability and willingness to participate in the work of governance instruments. We approach ‘participatory fit’ by identifying six properties of heterogeneous local social systems that governance instruments need to acknowledge to nurture balanced bottom-up participation: 1) economic resources and structures, 2) relationships to land, 3) level of education, 4) relationships between diverse actors, 5) divergent problem definitions, and 6) local identities. We discuss related sources of misfits and develop proposals on how conservation instruments could function as bridging organizations facilitating polycentric institutional structures that fit better to the social systems they are intended to govern. Such hybridization of governance could avoid pitfalls of considering one particular instrument (e.g. co-management or PES) as a panacea able to create win-win solutions.
topic Polycentric institutions
Social justice of conservation
social Fit
Participatory fit
Local Heterogeneity
co-management
Payments for Ecosystem Services
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cass.2015.2.issue-1/cass-2015-0007/cass-2015-0007.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT sarkkisimo fitbetweenconservationinstrumentsandlocalsocialsystemscasesofcomanagementandpaymentsforecosystemservices
AT rantalalauri fitbetweenconservationinstrumentsandlocalsocialsystemscasesofcomanagementandpaymentsforecosystemservices
AT karjalainentimop fitbetweenconservationinstrumentsandlocalsocialsystemscasesofcomanagementandpaymentsforecosystemservices
_version_ 1725289481126281216