Montagnes gatekhili, État gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en République de Géorgie

While many states at the periphery of the former Soviet Union have pursued decentralization in nearly all areas of governance, this trend is perhaps most notable in natural resource sectors and the effects these reforms have on society. I explore these scalar political, economic, and environmental c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jesse Quinn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut de Géographie Alpine 2017-03-01
Series:Revue de Géographie Alpine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/rga/3613
id doaj-c20c3276f2e4476885108ad917319455
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c20c3276f2e4476885108ad9173194552021-09-02T07:59:11ZengInstitut de Géographie AlpineRevue de Géographie Alpine0035-11211760-74262017-03-01105110.4000/rga.3613Montagnes gatekhili, État gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en République de GéorgieJesse QuinnWhile many states at the periphery of the former Soviet Union have pursued decentralization in nearly all areas of governance, this trend is perhaps most notable in natural resource sectors and the effects these reforms have on society. I explore these scalar political, economic, and environmental connections through a qualitative case study of alpine forest governance in the mountains of Georgia. Analyzing a series of thirty-five semi-structured interviews conducted during the summers of 2012 and 2013, I investigate the ways in which state power operates through governance of Georgia’s alpine forests. Like all democracies, the Georgian government oscillates between poles of centralization and decentralization. However, the practices of the Georgian government, as it currently exists through alpine forestry, produces a distinctly fractured (gatekhili in Georgian) form of democracy. The dynamics of the emerging Georgian state as seen through alpine forest governance are informative for understanding the political transition of mountainous post-Soviet states in the 21st century, and contemporary state formation more generally.http://journals.openedition.org/rga/3613post-Soviet developmentforeststategovernanceGeorgia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jesse Quinn
spellingShingle Jesse Quinn
Montagnes gatekhili, État gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en République de Géorgie
Revue de Géographie Alpine
post-Soviet development
forest
state
governance
Georgia
author_facet Jesse Quinn
author_sort Jesse Quinn
title Montagnes gatekhili, État gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en République de Géorgie
title_short Montagnes gatekhili, État gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en République de Géorgie
title_full Montagnes gatekhili, État gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en République de Géorgie
title_fullStr Montagnes gatekhili, État gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en République de Géorgie
title_full_unstemmed Montagnes gatekhili, État gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en République de Géorgie
title_sort montagnes gatekhili, état gatekhili : gestion fracturée de la forêt alpine et développement post-soviétique en république de géorgie
publisher Institut de Géographie Alpine
series Revue de Géographie Alpine
issn 0035-1121
1760-7426
publishDate 2017-03-01
description While many states at the periphery of the former Soviet Union have pursued decentralization in nearly all areas of governance, this trend is perhaps most notable in natural resource sectors and the effects these reforms have on society. I explore these scalar political, economic, and environmental connections through a qualitative case study of alpine forest governance in the mountains of Georgia. Analyzing a series of thirty-five semi-structured interviews conducted during the summers of 2012 and 2013, I investigate the ways in which state power operates through governance of Georgia’s alpine forests. Like all democracies, the Georgian government oscillates between poles of centralization and decentralization. However, the practices of the Georgian government, as it currently exists through alpine forestry, produces a distinctly fractured (gatekhili in Georgian) form of democracy. The dynamics of the emerging Georgian state as seen through alpine forest governance are informative for understanding the political transition of mountainous post-Soviet states in the 21st century, and contemporary state formation more generally.
topic post-Soviet development
forest
state
governance
Georgia
url http://journals.openedition.org/rga/3613
work_keys_str_mv AT jessequinn montagnesgatekhilietatgatekhiligestionfractureedelaforetalpineetdeveloppementpostsovietiqueenrepubliquedegeorgie
_version_ 1721178118351224832