Just Sitting and Just Saying: The Hermeneutics of Dōgen’s Realization-Based View of Language

This paper explicates the complex relationship between contemplative practice and enlightened activity conducted both on and off the meditative cushion as demonstrated in the approach of the Sōtō Zen Buddhist founder Dōgen (1200–1253). I examine Dōgen’s intricate views regarding how language, or wha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven Heine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/2/81
id doaj-c2023af31cd7440da8b72cee0025c692
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2023af31cd7440da8b72cee0025c6922021-01-29T00:01:21ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442021-01-0112818110.3390/rel12020081Just Sitting and Just Saying: The Hermeneutics of Dōgen’s Realization-Based View of LanguageSteven Heine0Department of Religions Studies, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USAThis paper explicates the complex relationship between contemplative practice and enlightened activity conducted both on and off the meditative cushion as demonstrated in the approach of the Sōtō Zen Buddhist founder Dōgen (1200–1253). I examine Dōgen’s intricate views regarding how language, or what I refer to as just saying, can and should be used in creative yet often puzzling and perplexing ways to express the experience of self-realization by reflecting the state of non-thinking that is attained through unremitting seated meditation or just sitting (<i>shikan taza</i>). In light of the sometimes-forbidding obscurity of his writing, as well as his occasional admonitions against a preoccupation with literary pursuits, I show based on a close reading of primary sources that Dōgen’s basic hermeneutic standpoint seeks to overcome conventional sets of binary oppositions involving uses of language. These polarities typically separate the respective roles of teacher and learner by distinguishing sharply between delusion and insight, truth and untruth, right and wrong, or speech and silence, and thereby reinforce a hierarchical, instrumental, and finite view of discourse. Instead, Dōgen inventively develops expressions that emphasize the non-hierarchical, realization–based, and eminently flexible functions of self-extricating rhetoric such that, according to his paradoxical teaching, “entangled vines are disentangled by using nothing other than entwined creepers,” or as a deceptively straightforward example, “the eyes are horizontal, and the nose is vertical.”https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/2/81DōgenSōtō Zen<i>Treasury of the True Dharma Eye</i><i>zazen</i>non-thinking<i>kōan</i>
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven Heine
spellingShingle Steven Heine
Just Sitting and Just Saying: The Hermeneutics of Dōgen’s Realization-Based View of Language
Religions
Dōgen
Sōtō Zen
<i>Treasury of the True Dharma Eye</i>
<i>zazen</i>
non-thinking
<i>kōan</i>
author_facet Steven Heine
author_sort Steven Heine
title Just Sitting and Just Saying: The Hermeneutics of Dōgen’s Realization-Based View of Language
title_short Just Sitting and Just Saying: The Hermeneutics of Dōgen’s Realization-Based View of Language
title_full Just Sitting and Just Saying: The Hermeneutics of Dōgen’s Realization-Based View of Language
title_fullStr Just Sitting and Just Saying: The Hermeneutics of Dōgen’s Realization-Based View of Language
title_full_unstemmed Just Sitting and Just Saying: The Hermeneutics of Dōgen’s Realization-Based View of Language
title_sort just sitting and just saying: the hermeneutics of dōgen’s realization-based view of language
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2021-01-01
description This paper explicates the complex relationship between contemplative practice and enlightened activity conducted both on and off the meditative cushion as demonstrated in the approach of the Sōtō Zen Buddhist founder Dōgen (1200–1253). I examine Dōgen’s intricate views regarding how language, or what I refer to as just saying, can and should be used in creative yet often puzzling and perplexing ways to express the experience of self-realization by reflecting the state of non-thinking that is attained through unremitting seated meditation or just sitting (<i>shikan taza</i>). In light of the sometimes-forbidding obscurity of his writing, as well as his occasional admonitions against a preoccupation with literary pursuits, I show based on a close reading of primary sources that Dōgen’s basic hermeneutic standpoint seeks to overcome conventional sets of binary oppositions involving uses of language. These polarities typically separate the respective roles of teacher and learner by distinguishing sharply between delusion and insight, truth and untruth, right and wrong, or speech and silence, and thereby reinforce a hierarchical, instrumental, and finite view of discourse. Instead, Dōgen inventively develops expressions that emphasize the non-hierarchical, realization–based, and eminently flexible functions of self-extricating rhetoric such that, according to his paradoxical teaching, “entangled vines are disentangled by using nothing other than entwined creepers,” or as a deceptively straightforward example, “the eyes are horizontal, and the nose is vertical.”
topic Dōgen
Sōtō Zen
<i>Treasury of the True Dharma Eye</i>
<i>zazen</i>
non-thinking
<i>kōan</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/2/81
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenheine justsittingandjustsayingthehermeneuticsofdogensrealizationbasedviewoflanguage
_version_ 1724319327355666432