Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention
Introduction: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. Aim: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Sexual Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116121000210 |
id |
doaj-c202005bb8f3426b94261ee5984425c8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c202005bb8f3426b94261ee5984425c82021-06-23T04:20:04ZengElsevierSexual Medicine2050-11612021-06-0193100341Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and PreventionAustin Lee, BA0Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS1Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH2Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH3Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS4Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USADivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USAPopulation Health Division, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Corresponding Author: Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS, FACS, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, 1001 Potrero Suite 3A, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. Tel.: 14152068805; Fax: 14152064499Introduction: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. Aim: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual preferences and rectal STI prevalence. Methods: Primary English-speaking individuals ≥18 years old visiting San Francisco City Clinic (SFCC) between April and May of 2018 who endorsed lubricant use during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months were studied. Associations between lubrication type used and collected covariates were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. We used logistic regression to examine the association between lubrication type and rectal STI test result. Main Outcome Measures: Rectal STI test positivity. Results: From all enrolled participants, 179 completed the survey and endorsed use of a lubricant during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months. Silicone lubricant users had the most sexual partners in the last 3 months (13 [mean] ± 30 [SD], P= .0003) and were most likely to have a history of gonorrhea. Oil-based lubricant users had the most partners with whom they had receptive anal sex in the last 3 months (7 ± 6, P= .03). Water-based lubricant users most commonly used a condom in their last sexual encounter and had the fewest sexual partners in the last 3 months (4 ± 4, P= .0003). Spit/saliva lubricant use was associated with positive rectal STI result. Conclusion: Silicone and oil-based lubricant users were more likely to report condomless receptive anal sex and to have a history of gonorrhea while spit/saliva lubricant use associated with positive rectal STI acquisition. Lee A, Gaither TW, Langston ME, et al. Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention. Sex Med 2021;9:100341.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116121000210Sexually Transmitted InfectionAnorectalLubricationPractice |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Austin Lee, BA Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS |
spellingShingle |
Austin Lee, BA Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention Sexual Medicine Sexually Transmitted Infection Anorectal Lubrication Practice |
author_facet |
Austin Lee, BA Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS |
author_sort |
Austin Lee, BA |
title |
Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_short |
Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_full |
Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_fullStr |
Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention |
title_sort |
lubrication practices and receptive anal sex: implications for sti transmission and prevention |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Sexual Medicine |
issn |
2050-1161 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Introduction: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. Aim: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual preferences and rectal STI prevalence. Methods: Primary English-speaking individuals ≥18 years old visiting San Francisco City Clinic (SFCC) between April and May of 2018 who endorsed lubricant use during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months were studied. Associations between lubrication type used and collected covariates were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. We used logistic regression to examine the association between lubrication type and rectal STI test result. Main Outcome Measures: Rectal STI test positivity. Results: From all enrolled participants, 179 completed the survey and endorsed use of a lubricant during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months. Silicone lubricant users had the most sexual partners in the last 3 months (13 [mean] ± 30 [SD], P= .0003) and were most likely to have a history of gonorrhea. Oil-based lubricant users had the most partners with whom they had receptive anal sex in the last 3 months (7 ± 6, P= .03). Water-based lubricant users most commonly used a condom in their last sexual encounter and had the fewest sexual partners in the last 3 months (4 ± 4, P= .0003). Spit/saliva lubricant use was associated with positive rectal STI result. Conclusion: Silicone and oil-based lubricant users were more likely to report condomless receptive anal sex and to have a history of gonorrhea while spit/saliva lubricant use associated with positive rectal STI acquisition. Lee A, Gaither TW, Langston ME, et al. Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention. Sex Med 2021;9:100341. |
topic |
Sexually Transmitted Infection Anorectal Lubrication Practice |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116121000210 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT austinleeba lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention AT thomaswgaithermdmas lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention AT marvinelangstonphdmph lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention AT stephanieecohenmdmph lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention AT benjaminnbreyermdmas lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention |
_version_ |
1721362645322301440 |