Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention

Introduction: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. Aim: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Austin Lee, BA, Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS, Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH, Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH, Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-06-01
Series:Sexual Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116121000210
id doaj-c202005bb8f3426b94261ee5984425c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c202005bb8f3426b94261ee5984425c82021-06-23T04:20:04ZengElsevierSexual Medicine2050-11612021-06-0193100341Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and PreventionAustin Lee, BA0Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS1Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH2Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH3Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS4Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USADivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USAPopulation Health Division, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Corresponding Author: Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS, FACS, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, 1001 Potrero Suite 3A, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. Tel.: 14152068805; Fax: 14152064499Introduction: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. Aim: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual preferences and rectal STI prevalence. Methods: Primary English-speaking individuals ≥18 years old visiting San Francisco City Clinic (SFCC) between April and May of 2018 who endorsed lubricant use during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months were studied. Associations between lubrication type used and collected covariates were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. We used logistic regression to examine the association between lubrication type and rectal STI test result. Main Outcome Measures: Rectal STI test positivity. Results: From all enrolled participants, 179 completed the survey and endorsed use of a lubricant during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months. Silicone lubricant users had the most sexual partners in the last 3 months (13 [mean] ± 30 [SD], P= .0003) and were most likely to have a history of gonorrhea. Oil-based lubricant users had the most partners with whom they had receptive anal sex in the last 3 months (7 ± 6, P= .03). Water-based lubricant users most commonly used a condom in their last sexual encounter and had the fewest sexual partners in the last 3 months (4 ± 4, P= .0003). Spit/saliva lubricant use was associated with positive rectal STI result. Conclusion: Silicone and oil-based lubricant users were more likely to report condomless receptive anal sex and to have a history of gonorrhea while spit/saliva lubricant use associated with positive rectal STI acquisition. Lee A, Gaither TW, Langston ME, et al. Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention. Sex Med 2021;9:100341.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116121000210Sexually Transmitted InfectionAnorectalLubricationPractice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Austin Lee, BA
Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS
Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH
Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH
Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS
spellingShingle Austin Lee, BA
Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS
Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH
Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH
Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS
Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention
Sexual Medicine
Sexually Transmitted Infection
Anorectal
Lubrication
Practice
author_facet Austin Lee, BA
Thomas W. Gaither, MD, MAS
Marvin E. Langston, PhD, MPH
Stephanie E. Cohen, MD, MPH
Benjamin N. Breyer, MD, MAS
author_sort Austin Lee, BA
title Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention
title_short Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention
title_full Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention
title_fullStr Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention
title_full_unstemmed Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention
title_sort lubrication practices and receptive anal sex: implications for sti transmission and prevention
publisher Elsevier
series Sexual Medicine
issn 2050-1161
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Introduction: Implications of lubricant use in men having sex with men (MSM) are poorly characterized, particularly associations with sexual behavior and rectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk. Aim: We sought to clarify covariates associated with lubrication type including differing sexual preferences and rectal STI prevalence. Methods: Primary English-speaking individuals ≥18 years old visiting San Francisco City Clinic (SFCC) between April and May of 2018 who endorsed lubricant use during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months were studied. Associations between lubrication type used and collected covariates were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. We used logistic regression to examine the association between lubrication type and rectal STI test result. Main Outcome Measures: Rectal STI test positivity. Results: From all enrolled participants, 179 completed the survey and endorsed use of a lubricant during receptive anal sex within the last 3 months. Silicone lubricant users had the most sexual partners in the last 3 months (13 [mean] ± 30 [SD], P= .0003) and were most likely to have a history of gonorrhea. Oil-based lubricant users had the most partners with whom they had receptive anal sex in the last 3 months (7 ± 6, P= .03). Water-based lubricant users most commonly used a condom in their last sexual encounter and had the fewest sexual partners in the last 3 months (4 ± 4, P= .0003). Spit/saliva lubricant use was associated with positive rectal STI result. Conclusion: Silicone and oil-based lubricant users were more likely to report condomless receptive anal sex and to have a history of gonorrhea while spit/saliva lubricant use associated with positive rectal STI acquisition. Lee A, Gaither TW, Langston ME, et al. Lubrication Practices and Receptive Anal Sex: Implications for STI Transmission and Prevention. Sex Med 2021;9:100341.
topic Sexually Transmitted Infection
Anorectal
Lubrication
Practice
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116121000210
work_keys_str_mv AT austinleeba lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention
AT thomaswgaithermdmas lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention
AT marvinelangstonphdmph lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention
AT stephanieecohenmdmph lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention
AT benjaminnbreyermdmas lubricationpracticesandreceptiveanalseximplicationsforstitransmissionandprevention
_version_ 1721362645322301440