ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS AND SIMILAR CONDITIONS: NEW TOOL TO MEASURE THE CORONAL PLANE

• Main Authors: Enguer Beraldo Garcia, Guilherme Brescia Payão, Liliane Faria Garcia, Enguer Beraldo Garcia Jr, Marcos Felipe Camarinha, Roberto Garcia Gonçalves, Juliana Garcia Camarinha, Saulo Terror Giesbrech, Victor de Oliveira Matos
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBC)
• Series: Coluna/Columna
• Subjects: Escoliosis; Cuidados preoperatorios; Cuidados posoperatorios
• Online Access: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000400281&lng=en&tlng=en

ABSTRACT Objective: To create a method to measure the overall coronal plane of the spine, called the sacral clavicular angle (SCA). Methods: A line is drawn at the base of the sacrum; a second central line is drawn perpendicular to the first one in the proximal extension of the spine. A third line is drawn passing through the intersections of the superior points of the clavicles with the two second ribs, forming two angles, the greater of which is measured. Therefore, the degrees exceeding 90° are the SCA values. This tool was tested retrospectively in a study of 46 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent short, apical, single or multiple fixations. Third generation instrumentation was used and the SCA was evaluated in the pre- and postoperative periods, which were compared with another group of 46 patients treated with the traditional technique. Results: Patients submitted to the traditional fixation method presented a median SCA of 3° in the preoperative period, and in the postoperative period, the SCA remained in 3°. Therefore, there was a 0% reduction. Patients submitted to short, apical, single or multiple fixation method presented a median preoperative SCA of 6°, and a postoperative median SCA of 1°, a reduction of approximately 83%. Conclusions: The group treated with short, apical, single or multiple instrumentation presented a reduction in the SCA of approximately 83% in the postoperative period compared to the preoperative period. The difference between preoperative and postoperative values was considered statistically significant. Level of Evidence II; Retrospective study.