Risk-Reduction Strategies for Platelet Transfusion in the United States

Despite bacterial culture of platelets, transfusion-associated bacteremia/sepsis (TABS) may occur with a frequency of approximately 1/60,000 platelet transfusions, while an emerging transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) could reproduce the epidemic of transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eleftherios C. Vamvakas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.60
id doaj-c1e05ff9b9b4422e9e704c24ada85fb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1e05ff9b9b4422e9e704c24ada85fb72020-11-24T22:13:21ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2011-01-011162464010.1100/tsw.2011.60Risk-Reduction Strategies for Platelet Transfusion in the United StatesEleftherios C. Vamvakas0Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USADespite bacterial culture of platelets, transfusion-associated bacteremia/sepsis (TABS) may occur with a frequency of approximately 1/60,000 platelet transfusions, while an emerging transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) could reproduce the epidemic of transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the future. As platelet pathogen-reduction (PR) systems licensed in Europe may eventually become licensed in the U.S., three alternative strategies for reducing the residual risks of TTIs and TABS may become available in the U.S. in the future: (1) transfusion of (already-available) non–pathogen-reduced single-donor (as opposed to pooled whole-blood-derived [PWBD]) platelets, (2) transfusion of pathogen-reduced single-donor platelets, or (3) transfusion of pathogen-reduced PWBD platelets (if trials of this component are conducted in the U.S. in the future). PR of platelets will increase the risk of mild and moderate (albeit perhaps not severe) bleeding complications and it cannot protect from all pathogens. Compared to PWBD platelets, single-donor platelets can reduce, by at least twofold, the risk of all known and emerging TTIs, as well as the risk of TABS, without incurring any risk. The fewer donor exposures secured by the use of single-donor platelets – especially if combined with collection of red blood cells and/or plasma from the same donation for transfusion to the same recipient through the use of multicomponent apheresis – may also reduce the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury. To choose between pathogen-reduced and non–pathogen-reduced single-donor platelets, the increased risks of bleeding complications as well as other possible adverse events secondary to PR need to be quantified precisely and weighed against the competing risks of TABS and emerging TTIs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.60
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eleftherios C. Vamvakas
spellingShingle Eleftherios C. Vamvakas
Risk-Reduction Strategies for Platelet Transfusion in the United States
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Eleftherios C. Vamvakas
author_sort Eleftherios C. Vamvakas
title Risk-Reduction Strategies for Platelet Transfusion in the United States
title_short Risk-Reduction Strategies for Platelet Transfusion in the United States
title_full Risk-Reduction Strategies for Platelet Transfusion in the United States
title_fullStr Risk-Reduction Strategies for Platelet Transfusion in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Risk-Reduction Strategies for Platelet Transfusion in the United States
title_sort risk-reduction strategies for platelet transfusion in the united states
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Despite bacterial culture of platelets, transfusion-associated bacteremia/sepsis (TABS) may occur with a frequency of approximately 1/60,000 platelet transfusions, while an emerging transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) could reproduce the epidemic of transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the future. As platelet pathogen-reduction (PR) systems licensed in Europe may eventually become licensed in the U.S., three alternative strategies for reducing the residual risks of TTIs and TABS may become available in the U.S. in the future: (1) transfusion of (already-available) non–pathogen-reduced single-donor (as opposed to pooled whole-blood-derived [PWBD]) platelets, (2) transfusion of pathogen-reduced single-donor platelets, or (3) transfusion of pathogen-reduced PWBD platelets (if trials of this component are conducted in the U.S. in the future). PR of platelets will increase the risk of mild and moderate (albeit perhaps not severe) bleeding complications and it cannot protect from all pathogens. Compared to PWBD platelets, single-donor platelets can reduce, by at least twofold, the risk of all known and emerging TTIs, as well as the risk of TABS, without incurring any risk. The fewer donor exposures secured by the use of single-donor platelets – especially if combined with collection of red blood cells and/or plasma from the same donation for transfusion to the same recipient through the use of multicomponent apheresis – may also reduce the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury. To choose between pathogen-reduced and non–pathogen-reduced single-donor platelets, the increased risks of bleeding complications as well as other possible adverse events secondary to PR need to be quantified precisely and weighed against the competing risks of TABS and emerging TTIs.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.60
work_keys_str_mv AT eleftherioscvamvakas riskreductionstrategiesforplatelettransfusionintheunitedstates
_version_ 1725801574706446336