Beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimization

Beam energy spread, and related beam motion, increase the difficulty in tuning for multipulse radiographic experiments at the dual-axis radiographic hydrodynamic test facility’s axis-II linear induction accelerator (LIA). In this article, we describe an optimization method to reduce the energy sprea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. R. Rose, C. Ekdahl, M. Schulze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2012-04-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.15.040403
id doaj-c1dafcd8a47747bc9d94abe98321948a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1dafcd8a47747bc9d94abe98321948a2020-11-25T01:50:34ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams1098-44022012-04-0115404040310.1103/PhysRevSTAB.15.040403Beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimizationC. R. RoseC. EkdahlM. SchulzeBeam energy spread, and related beam motion, increase the difficulty in tuning for multipulse radiographic experiments at the dual-axis radiographic hydrodynamic test facility’s axis-II linear induction accelerator (LIA). In this article, we describe an optimization method to reduce the energy spread by adjusting the timing of the cell voltages (both unloaded and loaded), either advancing or retarding, such that the injector voltage and summed cell voltages in the LIA result in a flatter energy profile. We developed a nonlinear optimization routine which accepts as inputs the 74 cell-voltage, injector voltage, and beam current waveforms. It optimizes cell timing per user-selected groups of cells and outputs timing adjustments, one for each of the selected groups. To verify the theory, we acquired and present data for both unloaded and loaded cell-timing optimizations. For the unloaded cells, the preoptimization baseline energy spread was reduced by 34% and 31% for two shots as compared to baseline. For the loaded-cell case, the measured energy spread was reduced by 49% compared to baseline.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.15.040403
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. R. Rose
C. Ekdahl
M. Schulze
spellingShingle C. R. Rose
C. Ekdahl
M. Schulze
Beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimization
Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
author_facet C. R. Rose
C. Ekdahl
M. Schulze
author_sort C. R. Rose
title Beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimization
title_short Beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimization
title_full Beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimization
title_fullStr Beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimization
title_full_unstemmed Beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimization
title_sort beam-energy-spread minimization using cell-timing optimization
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
issn 1098-4402
publishDate 2012-04-01
description Beam energy spread, and related beam motion, increase the difficulty in tuning for multipulse radiographic experiments at the dual-axis radiographic hydrodynamic test facility’s axis-II linear induction accelerator (LIA). In this article, we describe an optimization method to reduce the energy spread by adjusting the timing of the cell voltages (both unloaded and loaded), either advancing or retarding, such that the injector voltage and summed cell voltages in the LIA result in a flatter energy profile. We developed a nonlinear optimization routine which accepts as inputs the 74 cell-voltage, injector voltage, and beam current waveforms. It optimizes cell timing per user-selected groups of cells and outputs timing adjustments, one for each of the selected groups. To verify the theory, we acquired and present data for both unloaded and loaded cell-timing optimizations. For the unloaded cells, the preoptimization baseline energy spread was reduced by 34% and 31% for two shots as compared to baseline. For the loaded-cell case, the measured energy spread was reduced by 49% compared to baseline.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.15.040403
work_keys_str_mv AT crrose beamenergyspreadminimizationusingcelltimingoptimization
AT cekdahl beamenergyspreadminimizationusingcelltimingoptimization
AT mschulze beamenergyspreadminimizationusingcelltimingoptimization
_version_ 1725001199413886976