Reply to ‘Evidence for simple volcanic rifting not complex subduction initiation in the Laxmi Basin’
Recently, Pandey et al. proposed relict subduction initiation occurred along a passive margin in the northwest Indian Ocean, however, Clift et al. questioned their evidence for subduction initiation, suggesting that simpler rifting-related processes could more simply explain the available data. Here...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Nature Communications |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16570-5 |
| Summary: | Recently, Pandey et al. proposed relict subduction initiation occurred along a passive margin in the northwest Indian Ocean, however, Clift et al. questioned their evidence for subduction initiation, suggesting that simpler rifting-related processes could more simply explain the available data. Here, Pandey et al. reply to Clift et al.’s comment, and argue that geochemical and isotope data for Laxmi basin lavas distinctly imply relict subduction initiation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2041-1723 |