Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design

This study investigates the nature of the energy policy making process and policy priorities within the OECD in order to identify opportunities for improvement in these processes and to improve sustainability outcomes. The Qualitative Content Analysis methodology is used, investigating governance an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Chapman, Benjamin McLellan, Tetsuo Tezuka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-07-01
Series:Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/6/3/9
id doaj-c1caedc986b74aaca4862d17024f948c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1caedc986b74aaca4862d17024f948c2020-11-24T23:50:11ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872016-07-0163910.3390/admsci6030009admsci6030009Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy DesignAndrew Chapman0Benjamin McLellan1Tetsuo Tezuka2Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, JapanGraduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, JapanGraduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, JapanThis study investigates the nature of the energy policy making process and policy priorities within the OECD in order to identify opportunities for improvement in these processes and to improve sustainability outcomes. The Qualitative Content Analysis methodology is used, investigating governance and energy policy making alongside energy policy goals and priorities within eight OECD nations. A congruous energy policy making process (policy cycle) is discovered across the assessed nations, including the responsible bodies for each stage of the policy cycle and the current energy policy priorities. A key weakness was identified as a disconnect between the early stages of the policy cycle, issue identification and policy tool formulation, and the latter stages of implementation and evaluation. This weakness has meant that the social aspects of sustainability goals have been less developed than environmental and economic aspects and a heavy burden has been placed on the evaluation phase, risking a break down in the policy cycle. An additional “policy design” stage is proposed including a sustainability evaluation process prior to decision making and implementation, in order to remedy these identified shortcomings.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/6/3/9energypolicypolicy cycleOECDsustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Chapman
Benjamin McLellan
Tetsuo Tezuka
spellingShingle Andrew Chapman
Benjamin McLellan
Tetsuo Tezuka
Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design
Administrative Sciences
energy
policy
policy cycle
OECD
sustainability
author_facet Andrew Chapman
Benjamin McLellan
Tetsuo Tezuka
author_sort Andrew Chapman
title Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design
title_short Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design
title_full Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design
title_fullStr Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design
title_sort strengthening the energy policy making process and sustainability outcomes in the oecd through policy design
publisher MDPI AG
series Administrative Sciences
issn 2076-3387
publishDate 2016-07-01
description This study investigates the nature of the energy policy making process and policy priorities within the OECD in order to identify opportunities for improvement in these processes and to improve sustainability outcomes. The Qualitative Content Analysis methodology is used, investigating governance and energy policy making alongside energy policy goals and priorities within eight OECD nations. A congruous energy policy making process (policy cycle) is discovered across the assessed nations, including the responsible bodies for each stage of the policy cycle and the current energy policy priorities. A key weakness was identified as a disconnect between the early stages of the policy cycle, issue identification and policy tool formulation, and the latter stages of implementation and evaluation. This weakness has meant that the social aspects of sustainability goals have been less developed than environmental and economic aspects and a heavy burden has been placed on the evaluation phase, risking a break down in the policy cycle. An additional “policy design” stage is proposed including a sustainability evaluation process prior to decision making and implementation, in order to remedy these identified shortcomings.
topic energy
policy
policy cycle
OECD
sustainability
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/6/3/9
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewchapman strengtheningtheenergypolicymakingprocessandsustainabilityoutcomesintheoecdthroughpolicydesign
AT benjaminmclellan strengtheningtheenergypolicymakingprocessandsustainabilityoutcomesintheoecdthroughpolicydesign
AT tetsuotezuka strengtheningtheenergypolicymakingprocessandsustainabilityoutcomesintheoecdthroughpolicydesign
_version_ 1725479735431004160