Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction Pathway

In this article, the critical spontaneous ignition temperature of both hydrocarbon and alcohol fuel was acquired on a constant volume combustion bomb platform by slowly heating the inner charges, and then followed by using the CHEMKIN-PRO software to simulate the auto-ignition-dominated characterist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiang Liu, Zhongchang Liu, Xiaoming Ren, Yongqiang Han, Jun Wang, Jian Fang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/475
id doaj-c1ba5d0130574424a8a6945a253a4d56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1ba5d0130574424a8a6945a253a4d562020-11-25T00:27:24ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-02-0112347510.3390/en12030475en12030475Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction PathwayQiang Liu0Zhongchang Liu1Xiaoming Ren2Yongqiang Han3Jun Wang4Jian Fang5State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, ChinaResearch Center of Automobile Safety Technology of Jilin Engineering Normal University, Innovative Research Team of Jilin Engineering Normal University (IRTJLENU), Jilin Engineering Normal University, Changchun 130052, ChinaResearch Center of Automobile Safety Technology of Jilin Engineering Normal University, Innovative Research Team of Jilin Engineering Normal University (IRTJLENU), Jilin Engineering Normal University, Changchun 130052, ChinaIn this article, the critical spontaneous ignition temperature of both hydrocarbon and alcohol fuel was acquired on a constant volume combustion bomb platform by slowly heating the inner charges, and then followed by using the CHEMKIN-PRO software to simulate the auto-ignition-dominated characteristic and parameter sensitivity of the two kinds of fuels. Results revealed that in different conditions, the critical spontaneous ignition temperature of methanol changed dramatically, with a maximum temperature of 50 K, while the counterpart temperature of n-heptane remained an invariable value of 553 K within a large changeable scope of temperature, and only a maximum temperature of 10 K was observed. The maximum difference of spontaneous ignition temperature between methanol and n-heptane reached 270 K. At the same time, a minimum difference of 170 K was obtained as well. The complete reaction of methanol requires 5 steps, involving 6 components and 11 elementary reactions. However, for the comparative part-n-heptane, more than 20 main self-ignition reactions were involved, which indicated that the whole reaction process of n-heptane has more reaction pathway branches and it was much more complicated compared to methanol. The differences of the reaction pathways triggered a considerable distinction of critical self-ignition temperature between the two charges, making a “step-by-step„ spontaneous ignition combustion mode possible. In this way, a further high-efficient and clean combustion can be available to cater to much more stringent emission regulations in the future.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/475reaction pathwayinfluence parametercritical spontaneous ignition temperatureautomotive diesel engine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qiang Liu
Zhongchang Liu
Xiaoming Ren
Yongqiang Han
Jun Wang
Jian Fang
spellingShingle Qiang Liu
Zhongchang Liu
Xiaoming Ren
Yongqiang Han
Jun Wang
Jian Fang
Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction Pathway
Energies
reaction pathway
influence parameter
critical spontaneous ignition temperature
automotive diesel engine
author_facet Qiang Liu
Zhongchang Liu
Xiaoming Ren
Yongqiang Han
Jun Wang
Jian Fang
author_sort Qiang Liu
title Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction Pathway
title_short Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction Pathway
title_full Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction Pathway
title_fullStr Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction Pathway
title_full_unstemmed Study on Sensitivity Differences of Critical Spontaneous Ignition Temperature between Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels Based on Reaction Pathway
title_sort study on sensitivity differences of critical spontaneous ignition temperature between alcohol and hydrocarbon fuels based on reaction pathway
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2019-02-01
description In this article, the critical spontaneous ignition temperature of both hydrocarbon and alcohol fuel was acquired on a constant volume combustion bomb platform by slowly heating the inner charges, and then followed by using the CHEMKIN-PRO software to simulate the auto-ignition-dominated characteristic and parameter sensitivity of the two kinds of fuels. Results revealed that in different conditions, the critical spontaneous ignition temperature of methanol changed dramatically, with a maximum temperature of 50 K, while the counterpart temperature of n-heptane remained an invariable value of 553 K within a large changeable scope of temperature, and only a maximum temperature of 10 K was observed. The maximum difference of spontaneous ignition temperature between methanol and n-heptane reached 270 K. At the same time, a minimum difference of 170 K was obtained as well. The complete reaction of methanol requires 5 steps, involving 6 components and 11 elementary reactions. However, for the comparative part-n-heptane, more than 20 main self-ignition reactions were involved, which indicated that the whole reaction process of n-heptane has more reaction pathway branches and it was much more complicated compared to methanol. The differences of the reaction pathways triggered a considerable distinction of critical self-ignition temperature between the two charges, making a “step-by-step„ spontaneous ignition combustion mode possible. In this way, a further high-efficient and clean combustion can be available to cater to much more stringent emission regulations in the future.
topic reaction pathway
influence parameter
critical spontaneous ignition temperature
automotive diesel engine
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/475
work_keys_str_mv AT qiangliu studyonsensitivitydifferencesofcriticalspontaneousignitiontemperaturebetweenalcoholandhydrocarbonfuelsbasedonreactionpathway
AT zhongchangliu studyonsensitivitydifferencesofcriticalspontaneousignitiontemperaturebetweenalcoholandhydrocarbonfuelsbasedonreactionpathway
AT xiaomingren studyonsensitivitydifferencesofcriticalspontaneousignitiontemperaturebetweenalcoholandhydrocarbonfuelsbasedonreactionpathway
AT yongqianghan studyonsensitivitydifferencesofcriticalspontaneousignitiontemperaturebetweenalcoholandhydrocarbonfuelsbasedonreactionpathway
AT junwang studyonsensitivitydifferencesofcriticalspontaneousignitiontemperaturebetweenalcoholandhydrocarbonfuelsbasedonreactionpathway
AT jianfang studyonsensitivitydifferencesofcriticalspontaneousignitiontemperaturebetweenalcoholandhydrocarbonfuelsbasedonreactionpathway
_version_ 1725340082377850880