How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The objective of the current study was to measure dietary diversity in South Africans aged 16 years and older from all population groups as a proxy of food security.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steyn Nelia, Labadarios Demetre, Nel Johanna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-04-01
Series:Nutrition Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/33
id doaj-c1b710e2605a4628a6a6528e7c9cdcbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1b710e2605a4628a6a6528e7c9cdcbb2020-11-24T20:42:16ZengBMCNutrition Journal1475-28912011-04-011013310.1186/1475-2891-10-33How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?Steyn NeliaLabadarios DemetreNel Johanna<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The objective of the current study was to measure dietary diversity in South Africans aged 16 years and older from all population groups as a proxy of food security.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study representative of adults from all specified ages, provinces, geographic localities, and socio-economic strata in South Africa was used (n = 3287). Trained interviewers visited participants at their homes during the survey. Dietary data was collected by means of a face validated 24 hour recall which was not quantified. A dietary diversity score (DDS) was calculated by counting each of 9 food groups. A DDS <4 was regarded as reflecting poor dietary diversity and poor food security.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The provinces with the highest prevalence of poor dietary diversity (DDS <4) were Limpopo (61.8%) and the Eastern Cape (59.6%). By contrast, only 15.7% of participants in Western Cape had a low score. Participants in tribal areas (63.9%) and informal urban areas (55.7%) were by far the worst affected. There were significant differences in DDS by Living Standards Mean (LSM) analysis (p < 0.05) with the lowest LSM group having the lowest mean DDS (2.93).The most commonly consumed food groups were cereals/roots; meat/fish; dairy and vegetables other than vitamin A rich. Eggs, legumes, and vitamin A rich fruit and vegetables were the least consumed.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Overall the majority of South Africans consumed a diet low in dietary variety. The tribal areas and informal urban areas were worst affected and eggs, legumes and vitamin A rich fruit and vegetables, were the least consumed.</p> http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/33Dietary diversityAdultsAfricaFood groupsFood Security24 Hour Recall
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steyn Nelia
Labadarios Demetre
Nel Johanna
spellingShingle Steyn Nelia
Labadarios Demetre
Nel Johanna
How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?
Nutrition Journal
Dietary diversity
Adults
Africa
Food groups
Food Security
24 Hour Recall
author_facet Steyn Nelia
Labadarios Demetre
Nel Johanna
author_sort Steyn Nelia
title How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?
title_short How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?
title_full How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?
title_fullStr How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?
title_full_unstemmed How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?
title_sort how diverse is the diet of adult south africans?
publisher BMC
series Nutrition Journal
issn 1475-2891
publishDate 2011-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The objective of the current study was to measure dietary diversity in South Africans aged 16 years and older from all population groups as a proxy of food security.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study representative of adults from all specified ages, provinces, geographic localities, and socio-economic strata in South Africa was used (n = 3287). Trained interviewers visited participants at their homes during the survey. Dietary data was collected by means of a face validated 24 hour recall which was not quantified. A dietary diversity score (DDS) was calculated by counting each of 9 food groups. A DDS <4 was regarded as reflecting poor dietary diversity and poor food security.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The provinces with the highest prevalence of poor dietary diversity (DDS <4) were Limpopo (61.8%) and the Eastern Cape (59.6%). By contrast, only 15.7% of participants in Western Cape had a low score. Participants in tribal areas (63.9%) and informal urban areas (55.7%) were by far the worst affected. There were significant differences in DDS by Living Standards Mean (LSM) analysis (p < 0.05) with the lowest LSM group having the lowest mean DDS (2.93).The most commonly consumed food groups were cereals/roots; meat/fish; dairy and vegetables other than vitamin A rich. Eggs, legumes, and vitamin A rich fruit and vegetables were the least consumed.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Overall the majority of South Africans consumed a diet low in dietary variety. The tribal areas and informal urban areas were worst affected and eggs, legumes and vitamin A rich fruit and vegetables, were the least consumed.</p>
topic Dietary diversity
Adults
Africa
Food groups
Food Security
24 Hour Recall
url http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/33
work_keys_str_mv AT steynnelia howdiverseisthedietofadultsouthafricans
AT labadariosdemetre howdiverseisthedietofadultsouthafricans
AT neljohanna howdiverseisthedietofadultsouthafricans
_version_ 1716822704738271232