How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The objective of the current study was to measure dietary diversity in South Africans aged 16 years and older from all population groups as a proxy of food security.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional stu...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-04-01
|
Series: | Nutrition Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/33 |
id |
doaj-c1b710e2605a4628a6a6528e7c9cdcbb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c1b710e2605a4628a6a6528e7c9cdcbb2020-11-24T20:42:16ZengBMCNutrition Journal1475-28912011-04-011013310.1186/1475-2891-10-33How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans?Steyn NeliaLabadarios DemetreNel Johanna<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The objective of the current study was to measure dietary diversity in South Africans aged 16 years and older from all population groups as a proxy of food security.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study representative of adults from all specified ages, provinces, geographic localities, and socio-economic strata in South Africa was used (n = 3287). Trained interviewers visited participants at their homes during the survey. Dietary data was collected by means of a face validated 24 hour recall which was not quantified. A dietary diversity score (DDS) was calculated by counting each of 9 food groups. A DDS <4 was regarded as reflecting poor dietary diversity and poor food security.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The provinces with the highest prevalence of poor dietary diversity (DDS <4) were Limpopo (61.8%) and the Eastern Cape (59.6%). By contrast, only 15.7% of participants in Western Cape had a low score. Participants in tribal areas (63.9%) and informal urban areas (55.7%) were by far the worst affected. There were significant differences in DDS by Living Standards Mean (LSM) analysis (p < 0.05) with the lowest LSM group having the lowest mean DDS (2.93).The most commonly consumed food groups were cereals/roots; meat/fish; dairy and vegetables other than vitamin A rich. Eggs, legumes, and vitamin A rich fruit and vegetables were the least consumed.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Overall the majority of South Africans consumed a diet low in dietary variety. The tribal areas and informal urban areas were worst affected and eggs, legumes and vitamin A rich fruit and vegetables, were the least consumed.</p> http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/33Dietary diversityAdultsAfricaFood groupsFood Security24 Hour Recall |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steyn Nelia Labadarios Demetre Nel Johanna |
spellingShingle |
Steyn Nelia Labadarios Demetre Nel Johanna How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans? Nutrition Journal Dietary diversity Adults Africa Food groups Food Security 24 Hour Recall |
author_facet |
Steyn Nelia Labadarios Demetre Nel Johanna |
author_sort |
Steyn Nelia |
title |
How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans? |
title_short |
How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans? |
title_full |
How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans? |
title_fullStr |
How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How diverse is the diet of adult South Africans? |
title_sort |
how diverse is the diet of adult south africans? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Nutrition Journal |
issn |
1475-2891 |
publishDate |
2011-04-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The objective of the current study was to measure dietary diversity in South Africans aged 16 years and older from all population groups as a proxy of food security.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study representative of adults from all specified ages, provinces, geographic localities, and socio-economic strata in South Africa was used (n = 3287). Trained interviewers visited participants at their homes during the survey. Dietary data was collected by means of a face validated 24 hour recall which was not quantified. A dietary diversity score (DDS) was calculated by counting each of 9 food groups. A DDS <4 was regarded as reflecting poor dietary diversity and poor food security.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The provinces with the highest prevalence of poor dietary diversity (DDS <4) were Limpopo (61.8%) and the Eastern Cape (59.6%). By contrast, only 15.7% of participants in Western Cape had a low score. Participants in tribal areas (63.9%) and informal urban areas (55.7%) were by far the worst affected. There were significant differences in DDS by Living Standards Mean (LSM) analysis (p < 0.05) with the lowest LSM group having the lowest mean DDS (2.93).The most commonly consumed food groups were cereals/roots; meat/fish; dairy and vegetables other than vitamin A rich. Eggs, legumes, and vitamin A rich fruit and vegetables were the least consumed.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Overall the majority of South Africans consumed a diet low in dietary variety. The tribal areas and informal urban areas were worst affected and eggs, legumes and vitamin A rich fruit and vegetables, were the least consumed.</p> |
topic |
Dietary diversity Adults Africa Food groups Food Security 24 Hour Recall |
url |
http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/33 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT steynnelia howdiverseisthedietofadultsouthafricans AT labadariosdemetre howdiverseisthedietofadultsouthafricans AT neljohanna howdiverseisthedietofadultsouthafricans |
_version_ |
1716822704738271232 |