Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison

Background: The previously approved botulinum toxin and nowadays promising calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody have shown efficacy for preventing chronic migraine (CM). However, there is no direct evidence for their relative effectiveness and safety. In this study, we conducte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiajie Lu, Quanquan Zhang, Xiaoning Guo, Wei Liu, Chunyang Xu, Xiaowei Hu, Jianqiang Ni, Haifeng Lu, Hongru Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.631204/full
id doaj-c1b56f67a3464be9b6b9f0f7f84f111c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1b56f67a3464be9b6b9f0f7f84f111c2021-05-03T05:22:35ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122021-05-011210.3389/fphar.2021.631204631204Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment ComparisonJiajie Lu0Quanquan Zhang1Xiaoning Guo2Wei Liu3Chunyang Xu4Xiaowei Hu5Jianqiang Ni6Haifeng Lu7Hongru Zhao8Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Kunshan, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaBackground: The previously approved botulinum toxin and nowadays promising calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody have shown efficacy for preventing chronic migraine (CM). However, there is no direct evidence for their relative effectiveness and safety. In this study, we conducted an indirect treatment comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibody with botulinum toxin for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine.Methods: Up to August 31, 2020, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central). Weighted mean difference (WMD) and relative risk (RR) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) software was used to conduct indirect treatment comparison.Results: Ten studies were pooled with 6,325 patients in our meta-analysis. Both botulinum toxin and CGRP monoclonal antibody demonstrated favorable efficacy in the change of migraine days, headache days, HIT-6 score, and 50% migraine responder rate compared with placebo. In indirect treatment comparison, CGRP monoclonal antibody was superior to botulinum toxin in the frequency of acute analgesics intake (WMD = −1.31, 95% CI: −3.394 to 0.774, p = 0.02113), the rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 0.664, 95% CI: 0.469 to 0.939, p = 0.04047), and the rate of treatment-related serious adverse events (RR = 0.505, 95% CI: 0.005 to 46.98, p < 0.001).Conclusion: For chronic migraine patients, CGRP monoclonal antibody was slightly better than botulinum toxin in terms of efficacy and safety. In the future, head-to-head trials would be better to evaluate the efficacy and safety between different medications in the prevention of chronic migraine.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.631204/fullchronic migraineCGRP monoclonal antibodybotulinum toxinindirect treatment comparisonmeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiajie Lu
Quanquan Zhang
Xiaoning Guo
Wei Liu
Chunyang Xu
Xiaowei Hu
Jianqiang Ni
Haifeng Lu
Hongru Zhao
spellingShingle Jiajie Lu
Quanquan Zhang
Xiaoning Guo
Wei Liu
Chunyang Xu
Xiaowei Hu
Jianqiang Ni
Haifeng Lu
Hongru Zhao
Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison
Frontiers in Pharmacology
chronic migraine
CGRP monoclonal antibody
botulinum toxin
indirect treatment comparison
meta-analysis
author_facet Jiajie Lu
Quanquan Zhang
Xiaoning Guo
Wei Liu
Chunyang Xu
Xiaowei Hu
Jianqiang Ni
Haifeng Lu
Hongru Zhao
author_sort Jiajie Lu
title Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison
title_short Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison
title_full Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison
title_fullStr Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison
title_sort calcitonin gene–related peptide monoclonal antibody versus botulinum toxin for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: evidence from indirect treatment comparison
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
issn 1663-9812
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Background: The previously approved botulinum toxin and nowadays promising calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody have shown efficacy for preventing chronic migraine (CM). However, there is no direct evidence for their relative effectiveness and safety. In this study, we conducted an indirect treatment comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of CGRP monoclonal antibody with botulinum toxin for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine.Methods: Up to August 31, 2020, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central). Weighted mean difference (WMD) and relative risk (RR) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) software was used to conduct indirect treatment comparison.Results: Ten studies were pooled with 6,325 patients in our meta-analysis. Both botulinum toxin and CGRP monoclonal antibody demonstrated favorable efficacy in the change of migraine days, headache days, HIT-6 score, and 50% migraine responder rate compared with placebo. In indirect treatment comparison, CGRP monoclonal antibody was superior to botulinum toxin in the frequency of acute analgesics intake (WMD = −1.31, 95% CI: −3.394 to 0.774, p = 0.02113), the rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 0.664, 95% CI: 0.469 to 0.939, p = 0.04047), and the rate of treatment-related serious adverse events (RR = 0.505, 95% CI: 0.005 to 46.98, p < 0.001).Conclusion: For chronic migraine patients, CGRP monoclonal antibody was slightly better than botulinum toxin in terms of efficacy and safety. In the future, head-to-head trials would be better to evaluate the efficacy and safety between different medications in the prevention of chronic migraine.
topic chronic migraine
CGRP monoclonal antibody
botulinum toxin
indirect treatment comparison
meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.631204/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jiajielu calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
AT quanquanzhang calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
AT xiaoningguo calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
AT weiliu calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
AT chunyangxu calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
AT xiaoweihu calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
AT jianqiangni calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
AT haifenglu calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
AT hongruzhao calcitoningenerelatedpeptidemonoclonalantibodyversusbotulinumtoxinforthepreventivetreatmentofchronicmigraineevidencefromindirecttreatmentcomparison
_version_ 1721482819998318592