A Flexible Hybrid Model of Life Cycle Carbon Balance for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Management Systems

In this study we analyzed the effects of silvicultural treatments on carbon (C) budgets in Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) plantations in the southeastern United States. We developed a hybrid model that integrated a widely used growth and yield model for loblolly pine with published allometric and bi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke, Rafael De La Torre, Timothy A. Martin, Eric J. Jokela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2011-09-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/2/3/749/
id doaj-c1a9c504a2fe480788b8f1632acc7952
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1a9c504a2fe480788b8f1632acc79522020-11-24T22:10:11ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072011-09-012374977610.3390/f2030749A Flexible Hybrid Model of Life Cycle Carbon Balance for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Management SystemsCarlos A. Gonzalez-BeneckeRafael De La TorreTimothy A. MartinEric J. JokelaIn this study we analyzed the effects of silvicultural treatments on carbon (C) budgets in Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) plantations in the southeastern United States. We developed a hybrid model that integrated a widely used growth and yield model for loblolly pine with published allometric and biometric equations to simulate in situ C pools. The model used current values of forest product conversion efficiencies and forest product decay rates to calculate ex situ C pools. Using the model to evaluate the effects of silvicultural management systems on C sequestration over a 200 year simulation period, we concluded that site productivity (site quality), which can be altered by silviculture and genetic improvement, was the major factor controlling stand C density. On low productivity sites, average net C stocks were about 35% lower than in stands with the default average site quality; in contrast, on high quality sites, C stocks were about 38% greater than average productivity stands. If woody products were incorporated into the accounting, thinning was C positive because of the larger positive effects on ex situ C storage, rather than smaller reductions on in situ C storage. The use of biological rotation age (18 years) was not suitable for C sequestration, and extended rotation ages were found to increase stand C stock density. Stands with an 18-year-rotation length had 7% lower net C density than stands with a 22-year-rotation length; stands with a 35-year-rotation length had only 4% more C than stands harvested at age 22 years. The C sequestered in woody products was an important pool of C storage, accounting for ~34% of the average net C stock. Changes in decomposition rate, associated with possible environmental changes resulting from global climate change, affected C storage capacity of the forest. When decay rate was reduced to 10% or increased to 20%, the C stock in the dead pool (forest floor and coarse woody debris) was reduced about 11.8 MgC∙ha−1 or increased about 13.3 MgC∙ha−1, respectively, compared to the average decay rate of 15%. The C emissions due to silvicultural and harvest activities were small (~1.6% of the gross C stock) compared to the magnitude of total stand C stock. The C model, based on empirical and biological relationships, appears appropriate for use in regional C stock assessments for loblolly pine plantation ecosystems in the southern U.S.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/2/3/749/loblolly pinesilviculturestand dynamicsforest floorlife cycle analysiscarbon stock modeling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke
Rafael De La Torre
Timothy A. Martin
Eric J. Jokela
spellingShingle Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke
Rafael De La Torre
Timothy A. Martin
Eric J. Jokela
A Flexible Hybrid Model of Life Cycle Carbon Balance for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Management Systems
Forests
loblolly pine
silviculture
stand dynamics
forest floor
life cycle analysis
carbon stock modeling
author_facet Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke
Rafael De La Torre
Timothy A. Martin
Eric J. Jokela
author_sort Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke
title A Flexible Hybrid Model of Life Cycle Carbon Balance for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Management Systems
title_short A Flexible Hybrid Model of Life Cycle Carbon Balance for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Management Systems
title_full A Flexible Hybrid Model of Life Cycle Carbon Balance for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Management Systems
title_fullStr A Flexible Hybrid Model of Life Cycle Carbon Balance for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Management Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Flexible Hybrid Model of Life Cycle Carbon Balance for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Management Systems
title_sort flexible hybrid model of life cycle carbon balance for loblolly pine (pinus taeda l.) management systems
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2011-09-01
description In this study we analyzed the effects of silvicultural treatments on carbon (C) budgets in Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) plantations in the southeastern United States. We developed a hybrid model that integrated a widely used growth and yield model for loblolly pine with published allometric and biometric equations to simulate in situ C pools. The model used current values of forest product conversion efficiencies and forest product decay rates to calculate ex situ C pools. Using the model to evaluate the effects of silvicultural management systems on C sequestration over a 200 year simulation period, we concluded that site productivity (site quality), which can be altered by silviculture and genetic improvement, was the major factor controlling stand C density. On low productivity sites, average net C stocks were about 35% lower than in stands with the default average site quality; in contrast, on high quality sites, C stocks were about 38% greater than average productivity stands. If woody products were incorporated into the accounting, thinning was C positive because of the larger positive effects on ex situ C storage, rather than smaller reductions on in situ C storage. The use of biological rotation age (18 years) was not suitable for C sequestration, and extended rotation ages were found to increase stand C stock density. Stands with an 18-year-rotation length had 7% lower net C density than stands with a 22-year-rotation length; stands with a 35-year-rotation length had only 4% more C than stands harvested at age 22 years. The C sequestered in woody products was an important pool of C storage, accounting for ~34% of the average net C stock. Changes in decomposition rate, associated with possible environmental changes resulting from global climate change, affected C storage capacity of the forest. When decay rate was reduced to 10% or increased to 20%, the C stock in the dead pool (forest floor and coarse woody debris) was reduced about 11.8 MgC∙ha−1 or increased about 13.3 MgC∙ha−1, respectively, compared to the average decay rate of 15%. The C emissions due to silvicultural and harvest activities were small (~1.6% of the gross C stock) compared to the magnitude of total stand C stock. The C model, based on empirical and biological relationships, appears appropriate for use in regional C stock assessments for loblolly pine plantation ecosystems in the southern U.S.
topic loblolly pine
silviculture
stand dynamics
forest floor
life cycle analysis
carbon stock modeling
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/2/3/749/
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosagonzalezbenecke aflexiblehybridmodeloflifecyclecarbonbalanceforloblollypinepinustaedalmanagementsystems
AT rafaeldelatorre aflexiblehybridmodeloflifecyclecarbonbalanceforloblollypinepinustaedalmanagementsystems
AT timothyamartin aflexiblehybridmodeloflifecyclecarbonbalanceforloblollypinepinustaedalmanagementsystems
AT ericjjokela aflexiblehybridmodeloflifecyclecarbonbalanceforloblollypinepinustaedalmanagementsystems
AT carlosagonzalezbenecke flexiblehybridmodeloflifecyclecarbonbalanceforloblollypinepinustaedalmanagementsystems
AT rafaeldelatorre flexiblehybridmodeloflifecyclecarbonbalanceforloblollypinepinustaedalmanagementsystems
AT timothyamartin flexiblehybridmodeloflifecyclecarbonbalanceforloblollypinepinustaedalmanagementsystems
AT ericjjokela flexiblehybridmodeloflifecyclecarbonbalanceforloblollypinepinustaedalmanagementsystems
_version_ 1725808746086531072