Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate Arthrodesis

Purpose: Lunocapitate arthrodesis is a motion-preserving salvage procedure for painful wrist osteoarthritis. Because the arthrodesis is limited to the capitate and the lunate, the adaptive motion of the triquetrum is theoretically maintained. We aimed to examine whether triquetral motion is sustaine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thorsten Schriever, MD, Henrik Olivecrona, MD, PhD, Maria Wilcke, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514119301148
id doaj-c1a7c9b60a9f4d6789a2dd62ca4cef0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1a7c9b60a9f4d6789a2dd62ca4cef0d2020-11-25T02:05:16ZengElsevierJournal of Hand Surgery Global Online2589-51412020-01-01214245Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate ArthrodesisThorsten Schriever, MD0Henrik Olivecrona, MD, PhD1Maria Wilcke, MD, PhD2Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenKarolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden; Corresponding author: Maria Wilcke, MD, PhD, Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset 10, S-118 83 Stockholm, Sweden.Purpose: Lunocapitate arthrodesis is a motion-preserving salvage procedure for painful wrist osteoarthritis. Because the arthrodesis is limited to the capitate and the lunate, the adaptive motion of the triquetrum is theoretically maintained. We aimed to examine whether triquetral motion is sustained in vivo after lunocapitate arthrodesis. Methods: We examined 7 patients after lunocapitate arthrodesis at least 1 year earlier, with computed tomography at 2 wrist positions: maximal radial extension and maximal ulnar flexion. Triquetral motion in vivo was analyzed using volume registration technique of the paired computed tomography scans and compared with the contralateral side. Results: The triquetrum moved in all patients, but the degree of motion was small compared with the nonsurgical wrist. A minor degree of motion of the hamate relative to the fused lunocapitate could also be demonstrated. Conclusions: Triquetral motion is limited after lunocapitate arthrodesis. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV. Key words: lunatocapitate arthrodesis, osteoarthritis, scapholunate advanced collapse, scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, triquetrumhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514119301148
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thorsten Schriever, MD
Henrik Olivecrona, MD, PhD
Maria Wilcke, MD, PhD
spellingShingle Thorsten Schriever, MD
Henrik Olivecrona, MD, PhD
Maria Wilcke, MD, PhD
Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate Arthrodesis
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
author_facet Thorsten Schriever, MD
Henrik Olivecrona, MD, PhD
Maria Wilcke, MD, PhD
author_sort Thorsten Schriever, MD
title Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate Arthrodesis
title_short Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate Arthrodesis
title_full Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate Arthrodesis
title_fullStr Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate Arthrodesis
title_full_unstemmed Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate Arthrodesis
title_sort triquetral motion is limited in vivo after lunocapitate arthrodesis
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
issn 2589-5141
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose: Lunocapitate arthrodesis is a motion-preserving salvage procedure for painful wrist osteoarthritis. Because the arthrodesis is limited to the capitate and the lunate, the adaptive motion of the triquetrum is theoretically maintained. We aimed to examine whether triquetral motion is sustained in vivo after lunocapitate arthrodesis. Methods: We examined 7 patients after lunocapitate arthrodesis at least 1 year earlier, with computed tomography at 2 wrist positions: maximal radial extension and maximal ulnar flexion. Triquetral motion in vivo was analyzed using volume registration technique of the paired computed tomography scans and compared with the contralateral side. Results: The triquetrum moved in all patients, but the degree of motion was small compared with the nonsurgical wrist. A minor degree of motion of the hamate relative to the fused lunocapitate could also be demonstrated. Conclusions: Triquetral motion is limited after lunocapitate arthrodesis. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV. Key words: lunatocapitate arthrodesis, osteoarthritis, scapholunate advanced collapse, scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, triquetrum
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514119301148
work_keys_str_mv AT thorstenschrievermd triquetralmotionislimitedinvivoafterlunocapitatearthrodesis
AT henrikolivecronamdphd triquetralmotionislimitedinvivoafterlunocapitatearthrodesis
AT mariawilckemdphd triquetralmotionislimitedinvivoafterlunocapitatearthrodesis
_version_ 1724939164907995136