Oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)

Background: Due to an increasing incidence of respiratory failure after cardiac surgery we wanted to study whether nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) may improve pulmonary oxygen transfer and may avoid reintubation after coronary operations. Additionally, we compared this protocol to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammed Kurt, Udo Boeken, Jens Litmathe, Peter Feindt, Emmeran Gams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/425
id doaj-c1a53c2c2c7b41e086b82ad6d2f916a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1a53c2c2c7b41e086b82ad6d2f916a62020-11-25T00:42:11ZengPAGEPress PublicationsMonaldi Archives for Chest Disease1122-06432532-52642016-01-0170210.4081/monaldi.2008.425Oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)Muhammed Kurt0Udo Boeken1Jens Litmathe2Peter Feindt3Emmeran Gams4Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital, DuesseldorfDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital, DuesseldorfDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital, DuesseldorfDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital, DuesseldorfDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital, DuesseldorfBackground: Due to an increasing incidence of respiratory failure after cardiac surgery we wanted to study whether nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) may improve pulmonary oxygen transfer and may avoid reintubation after coronary operations. Additionally, we compared this protocol to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). Methods: For a period of 2 years we analyzed all patients that were extubated within 12 hours after coronary surgery, and in whom oxygen transfer (PaO2/FIO2) deteriorated without hypercapnia so that all these patients met predefined criteria for reintubation: group A=immediate reintubation (n=88), group B=NCPAP-treatment (n=173), group C=NPPV(n=18). Results: 25,4% of group B- and 22,2% of group C-patients were also intubated after a period of NCPAP or NPPV. All other patients of groups B and C could be weaned from these devices (B = 34.3 ± 5.9 hours; C = 26.4 ± 4.4 h; p<0.05) and were well oxygenated by face mask at ambient pressure (Ratio PaO2/FIO2: B, 138 ± 13; C, 140 ± 13). In group A we found a higher mortality (7.95%) compared to group B (4.04%) and group C (5.55%). NCPAP-patients suffered more frequently from an impaired sternal wound healing (A = 4.5%, B = 8.6%; p<0.05). Conclusions: We conclude that reintubation after cardiac operations should be avoided since NCPAP and NPPV are safe and effective to improve arterial oxygenation in most patients with non hypercapnic respiratory failure.https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/425cardiac surgeryrespiratory failurereintubationnon-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Muhammed Kurt
Udo Boeken
Jens Litmathe
Peter Feindt
Emmeran Gams
spellingShingle Muhammed Kurt
Udo Boeken
Jens Litmathe
Peter Feindt
Emmeran Gams
Oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
cardiac surgery
respiratory failure
reintubation
non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)
author_facet Muhammed Kurt
Udo Boeken
Jens Litmathe
Peter Feindt
Emmeran Gams
author_sort Muhammed Kurt
title Oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
title_short Oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
title_full Oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
title_fullStr Oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
title_full_unstemmed Oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
title_sort oxygenation failure after cardiac surgery: early re-intubation versus treatment by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (ncpap) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (nppv)
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
issn 1122-0643
2532-5264
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background: Due to an increasing incidence of respiratory failure after cardiac surgery we wanted to study whether nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) may improve pulmonary oxygen transfer and may avoid reintubation after coronary operations. Additionally, we compared this protocol to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). Methods: For a period of 2 years we analyzed all patients that were extubated within 12 hours after coronary surgery, and in whom oxygen transfer (PaO2/FIO2) deteriorated without hypercapnia so that all these patients met predefined criteria for reintubation: group A=immediate reintubation (n=88), group B=NCPAP-treatment (n=173), group C=NPPV(n=18). Results: 25,4% of group B- and 22,2% of group C-patients were also intubated after a period of NCPAP or NPPV. All other patients of groups B and C could be weaned from these devices (B = 34.3 ± 5.9 hours; C = 26.4 ± 4.4 h; p<0.05) and were well oxygenated by face mask at ambient pressure (Ratio PaO2/FIO2: B, 138 ± 13; C, 140 ± 13). In group A we found a higher mortality (7.95%) compared to group B (4.04%) and group C (5.55%). NCPAP-patients suffered more frequently from an impaired sternal wound healing (A = 4.5%, B = 8.6%; p<0.05). Conclusions: We conclude that reintubation after cardiac operations should be avoided since NCPAP and NPPV are safe and effective to improve arterial oxygenation in most patients with non hypercapnic respiratory failure.
topic cardiac surgery
respiratory failure
reintubation
non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV)
nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)
url https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/425
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammedkurt oxygenationfailureaftercardiacsurgeryearlyreintubationversustreatmentbynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurencpapornoninvasivepositivepressureventilationnppv
AT udoboeken oxygenationfailureaftercardiacsurgeryearlyreintubationversustreatmentbynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurencpapornoninvasivepositivepressureventilationnppv
AT jenslitmathe oxygenationfailureaftercardiacsurgeryearlyreintubationversustreatmentbynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurencpapornoninvasivepositivepressureventilationnppv
AT peterfeindt oxygenationfailureaftercardiacsurgeryearlyreintubationversustreatmentbynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurencpapornoninvasivepositivepressureventilationnppv
AT emmerangams oxygenationfailureaftercardiacsurgeryearlyreintubationversustreatmentbynasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurencpapornoninvasivepositivepressureventilationnppv
_version_ 1725283359926517760