Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in India

Context: Though intensive care units (ICUs) only account for 10% of hospital beds, they consume nearly 22% of hospital resources. Few definitive costing studies have been conducted in Indian settings that would help determine appropriate resource allocation. Aim: To evaluate and compare the cost of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parmeshwar Kumar, Vishwanathan Jithesh, Shakti Kumar Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2015;volume=9;issue=2;spage=189;epage=194;aulast=Kumar
id doaj-c198e2bfae724f23971f7a1a36e23fbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c198e2bfae724f23971f7a1a36e23fbb2020-11-24T21:47:49ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia1658-354X2015-01-019218919410.4103/1658-354X.152883Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in IndiaParmeshwar KumarVishwanathan JitheshShakti Kumar GuptaContext: Though intensive care units (ICUs) only account for 10% of hospital beds, they consume nearly 22% of hospital resources. Few definitive costing studies have been conducted in Indian settings that would help determine appropriate resource allocation. Aim: To evaluate and compare the cost of intensive care delivery between multi-specialty and neurosurgery ICU in an apex trauma care facility in India. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a polytrauma and neurosurgery ICU at a 203 bedded level IV trauma care facility in New Delhi, India from May, 2012 to June 2012. The study was cross-sectional, retrospective, and record-based. Traditional costing was used to arrive at the cost for both direct and indirect cost estimates. The cost centers included in study were building cost, equipment cost, human resources, materials and supplies, clinical and nonclinical support services, engineering maintenance cost, and biomedical waste management. Statistical Analysis: Fisher′s two-tailed t-test. Results: Total cost/bed/day for the multi-specialty ICU was Rs. 14,976.9/- and for the neurosurgery ICU was Rs. 14,306.7/-, manpower constituting nearly half of the expenditure in both ICUs. The cost center wise and overall difference in the cost among the ICUs were statistically significant. Conclusions: Quantification of expenditure in running an ICU in a trauma center would assist healthcare decision makers in better allocation of resources. Although multi-specialty ICUs are more expensive, other factors will also play a role in defining the kind of ICU that need to be designed.http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2015;volume=9;issue=2;spage=189;epage=194;aulast=KumarIntensive care unittraditional costing methodtrauma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Parmeshwar Kumar
Vishwanathan Jithesh
Shakti Kumar Gupta
spellingShingle Parmeshwar Kumar
Vishwanathan Jithesh
Shakti Kumar Gupta
Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in India
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Intensive care unit
traditional costing method
trauma
author_facet Parmeshwar Kumar
Vishwanathan Jithesh
Shakti Kumar Gupta
author_sort Parmeshwar Kumar
title Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in India
title_short Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in India
title_full Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in India
title_fullStr Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in India
title_full_unstemmed Does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? A costing study in a trauma center in India
title_sort does a single specialty intensive care unit make better business sense than a multi-specialty intensive care unit? a costing study in a trauma center in india
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 1658-354X
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Context: Though intensive care units (ICUs) only account for 10% of hospital beds, they consume nearly 22% of hospital resources. Few definitive costing studies have been conducted in Indian settings that would help determine appropriate resource allocation. Aim: To evaluate and compare the cost of intensive care delivery between multi-specialty and neurosurgery ICU in an apex trauma care facility in India. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a polytrauma and neurosurgery ICU at a 203 bedded level IV trauma care facility in New Delhi, India from May, 2012 to June 2012. The study was cross-sectional, retrospective, and record-based. Traditional costing was used to arrive at the cost for both direct and indirect cost estimates. The cost centers included in study were building cost, equipment cost, human resources, materials and supplies, clinical and nonclinical support services, engineering maintenance cost, and biomedical waste management. Statistical Analysis: Fisher′s two-tailed t-test. Results: Total cost/bed/day for the multi-specialty ICU was Rs. 14,976.9/- and for the neurosurgery ICU was Rs. 14,306.7/-, manpower constituting nearly half of the expenditure in both ICUs. The cost center wise and overall difference in the cost among the ICUs were statistically significant. Conclusions: Quantification of expenditure in running an ICU in a trauma center would assist healthcare decision makers in better allocation of resources. Although multi-specialty ICUs are more expensive, other factors will also play a role in defining the kind of ICU that need to be designed.
topic Intensive care unit
traditional costing method
trauma
url http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2015;volume=9;issue=2;spage=189;epage=194;aulast=Kumar
work_keys_str_mv AT parmeshwarkumar doesasinglespecialtyintensivecareunitmakebetterbusinesssensethanamultispecialtyintensivecareunitacostingstudyinatraumacenterinindia
AT vishwanathanjithesh doesasinglespecialtyintensivecareunitmakebetterbusinesssensethanamultispecialtyintensivecareunitacostingstudyinatraumacenterinindia
AT shaktikumargupta doesasinglespecialtyintensivecareunitmakebetterbusinesssensethanamultispecialtyintensivecareunitacostingstudyinatraumacenterinindia
_version_ 1725895344244391936