Comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plants

This study compares the Life Cycle Assessment based Water Scarcity Footprint of produced energy unit in two nuclear power plants in the Czech Republic between 2005 and 2015. Primary data has been used to allocate impacts to the core processing stage. Although the real total amount of water consumpti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Libor Ansorge, Jiří Dlabal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Warsaw University of Life Sciences 2017-12-01
Series:Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska
Subjects:
LCA
Online Access: http://iks.pn.sggw.pl/PN78/A8/art8.pdf
id doaj-c136a53de50b4902aded3f21565e53eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c136a53de50b4902aded3f21565e53eb2020-11-24T23:45:12ZengWarsaw University of Life SciencesPrzegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska1732-93532543-74962017-12-0126448949710.22630/PNIKS.2017.26.4.47Comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plantsLibor Ansorge0Jiří Dlabal1 T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute - Public Research Institution T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute - Public Research Institution This study compares the Life Cycle Assessment based Water Scarcity Footprint of produced energy unit in two nuclear power plants in the Czech Republic between 2005 and 2015. Primary data has been used to allocate impacts to the core processing stage. Although the real total amount of water consumption in both power plants is similar, the water scarcity footprint in Temelín nuclear power plant is of approximately 8.9 m3 H2Oeq per MWh lower than in Dukovany power plant. The cooling water has the most significant contribution to the freshwater availability impact category. Evaporation from reservoirs which are a part of water management of the individual power plants has lower, but not inconsiderable, contribution to the water consumption. In the case of Temelín nuclear power plant, the loss caused by evaporation from Hněvkovice reservoir is of approximately 6.5% of the difference between withdrawal and discharge of the power plant. In the case of Dukovany nuclear power plant, evaporation from Dalešice - Mohelno reservoir is of even around 11%. http://iks.pn.sggw.pl/PN78/A8/art8.pdf water scarcity footprintnuclear power plantLCAcomparative studyISO 14046
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Libor Ansorge
Jiří Dlabal
spellingShingle Libor Ansorge
Jiří Dlabal
Comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plants
Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska
water scarcity footprint
nuclear power plant
LCA
comparative study
ISO 14046
author_facet Libor Ansorge
Jiří Dlabal
author_sort Libor Ansorge
title Comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plants
title_short Comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plants
title_full Comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plants
title_fullStr Comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plants
title_full_unstemmed Comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plants
title_sort comparative water scarcity footprint study of two nuclear power plants
publisher Warsaw University of Life Sciences
series Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska
issn 1732-9353
2543-7496
publishDate 2017-12-01
description This study compares the Life Cycle Assessment based Water Scarcity Footprint of produced energy unit in two nuclear power plants in the Czech Republic between 2005 and 2015. Primary data has been used to allocate impacts to the core processing stage. Although the real total amount of water consumption in both power plants is similar, the water scarcity footprint in Temelín nuclear power plant is of approximately 8.9 m3 H2Oeq per MWh lower than in Dukovany power plant. The cooling water has the most significant contribution to the freshwater availability impact category. Evaporation from reservoirs which are a part of water management of the individual power plants has lower, but not inconsiderable, contribution to the water consumption. In the case of Temelín nuclear power plant, the loss caused by evaporation from Hněvkovice reservoir is of approximately 6.5% of the difference between withdrawal and discharge of the power plant. In the case of Dukovany nuclear power plant, evaporation from Dalešice - Mohelno reservoir is of even around 11%.
topic water scarcity footprint
nuclear power plant
LCA
comparative study
ISO 14046
url http://iks.pn.sggw.pl/PN78/A8/art8.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT liboransorge comparativewaterscarcityfootprintstudyoftwonuclearpowerplants
AT jiridlabal comparativewaterscarcityfootprintstudyoftwonuclearpowerplants
_version_ 1725496852409745408