Appraisal of Governance of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects (MIPs) Delivery in Nigeria

Ineffective governance has been identified as one of the major challenges confronting successful delivery of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects’ (MIPs) and other projects. This study appraised current approaches to governance of MIPs’ delivery in Nigeria with the aim of identifying and proffering...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: G. A. Zarewa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Maiduguri 2018-06-01
Series:Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment
Online Access:http://azojete.com.ng/index.php/azojete/article/view/396
id doaj-c119d11885654c59a523146153f683ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c119d11885654c59a523146153f683ce2020-11-25T02:19:29ZengUniversity of MaiduguriArid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment2545-58182545-58182018-06-01142189200Appraisal of Governance of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects (MIPs) Delivery in NigeriaG. A. Zarewa0Department of Quantity Surveying, Bayero University Kano, Kano, NigeriaIneffective governance has been identified as one of the major challenges confronting successful delivery of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects’ (MIPs) and other projects. This study appraised current approaches to governance of MIPs’ delivery in Nigeria with the aim of identifying and proffering solutions to governance challenges the projects encounter. The study was conducted through literature review and semi-structured interviews with key role players who participated in the governance of eight out of thirty - five MIPs at different locations in the country followed by thematic data analysis. The study discovered that governance of MIPs’ delivery in Nigeria was done haphazardly.Two of the studied MIPs failed due to their intuitive initiation on the basis of political exigencies,tying theirfunding to erratic sources of funds andunwarranted scope changeswhile another MIP failed due change of government.Protests by some stakeholders; delayed decisions; political considerations and alleged corruptionin the award of contracts; bankruptcy of a contractor;refusal of members of a host community of an MIP to allow the MIP to take off unless they were settled; conflict between some role players and so forthaffected the delivery of other five MIPs.The study concluded that MIPs’ governance as practiced in Nigeria today does not support effective delivery of the projects and recommends the development and effective implementation of a uniformly accepted governance framework to guide MIP’s governance.http://azojete.com.ng/index.php/azojete/article/view/396
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. A. Zarewa
spellingShingle G. A. Zarewa
Appraisal of Governance of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects (MIPs) Delivery in Nigeria
Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment
author_facet G. A. Zarewa
author_sort G. A. Zarewa
title Appraisal of Governance of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects (MIPs) Delivery in Nigeria
title_short Appraisal of Governance of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects (MIPs) Delivery in Nigeria
title_full Appraisal of Governance of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects (MIPs) Delivery in Nigeria
title_fullStr Appraisal of Governance of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects (MIPs) Delivery in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Appraisal of Governance of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects (MIPs) Delivery in Nigeria
title_sort appraisal of governance of multifarious infrastructure projects (mips) delivery in nigeria
publisher University of Maiduguri
series Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment
issn 2545-5818
2545-5818
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Ineffective governance has been identified as one of the major challenges confronting successful delivery of Multifarious Infrastructure Projects’ (MIPs) and other projects. This study appraised current approaches to governance of MIPs’ delivery in Nigeria with the aim of identifying and proffering solutions to governance challenges the projects encounter. The study was conducted through literature review and semi-structured interviews with key role players who participated in the governance of eight out of thirty - five MIPs at different locations in the country followed by thematic data analysis. The study discovered that governance of MIPs’ delivery in Nigeria was done haphazardly.Two of the studied MIPs failed due to their intuitive initiation on the basis of political exigencies,tying theirfunding to erratic sources of funds andunwarranted scope changeswhile another MIP failed due change of government.Protests by some stakeholders; delayed decisions; political considerations and alleged corruptionin the award of contracts; bankruptcy of a contractor;refusal of members of a host community of an MIP to allow the MIP to take off unless they were settled; conflict between some role players and so forthaffected the delivery of other five MIPs.The study concluded that MIPs’ governance as practiced in Nigeria today does not support effective delivery of the projects and recommends the development and effective implementation of a uniformly accepted governance framework to guide MIP’s governance.
url http://azojete.com.ng/index.php/azojete/article/view/396
work_keys_str_mv AT gazarewa appraisalofgovernanceofmultifariousinfrastructureprojectsmipsdeliveryinnigeria
_version_ 1724876525053935616