Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA Copolymer
Although bioabsorbable polymers have garnered increasing attention because of their potential in tissue engineering applications, to our knowledge there are only a few bioabsorbable 3D printed medical devices on the market thus far. In this study, we assessed the processability of medical grade Poly...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Polymers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/4/572 |
id |
doaj-c105d3f66d774f63a9ab7b51d1ae6573 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c105d3f66d774f63a9ab7b51d1ae65732021-02-15T00:02:13ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602021-02-011357257210.3390/polym13040572Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA CopolymerMarion Gradwohl0Feng Chai1Julien Payen2Pierre Guerreschi3Philippe Marchetti4Nicolas Blanchemain5Inserm, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, U1008, F-59000 Lille, FranceInserm, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, U1008, F-59000 Lille, FranceLATTICE MEDICAL, 59120 Loos, FranceInserm, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, U1008, F-59000 Lille, FranceCNRS INSERM UMR-9020-UMR-S 1277 CANTHER, 59000 Lille, FranceInserm, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, U1008, F-59000 Lille, FranceAlthough bioabsorbable polymers have garnered increasing attention because of their potential in tissue engineering applications, to our knowledge there are only a few bioabsorbable 3D printed medical devices on the market thus far. In this study, we assessed the processability of medical grade Poly(lactic-<i>co</i>-glycolic) Acid (PLGA)85:15 via two additive manufacturing technologies: Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) and Direct Pellet Printing (DPP) to highlight the least destructive technology towards PLGA. To quantify PLGA degradation, its molecular weight (gel permeation chromatography (GPC)) as well as its thermal properties (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)) were evaluated at each processing step, including sterilization with conventional methods (ethylene oxide, gamma, and beta irradiation). Results show that 3D printing of PLGA on a DPP printer significantly decreased the number-average molecular weight (Mn) to the greatest extent (26% Mn loss, p < 0.0001) as it applies a longer residence time and higher shear stress compared to classic FFF (19% Mn loss, p < 0.0001). Among all sterilization methods tested, ethylene oxide seems to be the most appropriate, as it leads to no significant changes in PLGA properties. After sterilization, all samples were considered to be non-toxic, as cell viability was above 70% compared to the control, indicating that this manufacturing route could be used for the development of bioabsorbable medical devices. Based on our observations, we recommend using FFF printing and ethylene oxide sterilization to produce PLGA medical devices.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/4/572additive manufacturingsterilizationmedical devicesbioabsorbablepolymer |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marion Gradwohl Feng Chai Julien Payen Pierre Guerreschi Philippe Marchetti Nicolas Blanchemain |
spellingShingle |
Marion Gradwohl Feng Chai Julien Payen Pierre Guerreschi Philippe Marchetti Nicolas Blanchemain Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA Copolymer Polymers additive manufacturing sterilization medical devices bioabsorbable polymer |
author_facet |
Marion Gradwohl Feng Chai Julien Payen Pierre Guerreschi Philippe Marchetti Nicolas Blanchemain |
author_sort |
Marion Gradwohl |
title |
Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA Copolymer |
title_short |
Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA Copolymer |
title_full |
Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA Copolymer |
title_fullStr |
Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA Copolymer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA Copolymer |
title_sort |
effects of two melt extrusion based additive manufacturing technologies and common sterilization methods on the properties of a medical grade plga copolymer |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Polymers |
issn |
2073-4360 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Although bioabsorbable polymers have garnered increasing attention because of their potential in tissue engineering applications, to our knowledge there are only a few bioabsorbable 3D printed medical devices on the market thus far. In this study, we assessed the processability of medical grade Poly(lactic-<i>co</i>-glycolic) Acid (PLGA)85:15 via two additive manufacturing technologies: Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) and Direct Pellet Printing (DPP) to highlight the least destructive technology towards PLGA. To quantify PLGA degradation, its molecular weight (gel permeation chromatography (GPC)) as well as its thermal properties (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)) were evaluated at each processing step, including sterilization with conventional methods (ethylene oxide, gamma, and beta irradiation). Results show that 3D printing of PLGA on a DPP printer significantly decreased the number-average molecular weight (Mn) to the greatest extent (26% Mn loss, p < 0.0001) as it applies a longer residence time and higher shear stress compared to classic FFF (19% Mn loss, p < 0.0001). Among all sterilization methods tested, ethylene oxide seems to be the most appropriate, as it leads to no significant changes in PLGA properties. After sterilization, all samples were considered to be non-toxic, as cell viability was above 70% compared to the control, indicating that this manufacturing route could be used for the development of bioabsorbable medical devices. Based on our observations, we recommend using FFF printing and ethylene oxide sterilization to produce PLGA medical devices. |
topic |
additive manufacturing sterilization medical devices bioabsorbable polymer |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/4/572 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariongradwohl effectsoftwomeltextrusionbasedadditivemanufacturingtechnologiesandcommonsterilizationmethodsonthepropertiesofamedicalgradeplgacopolymer AT fengchai effectsoftwomeltextrusionbasedadditivemanufacturingtechnologiesandcommonsterilizationmethodsonthepropertiesofamedicalgradeplgacopolymer AT julienpayen effectsoftwomeltextrusionbasedadditivemanufacturingtechnologiesandcommonsterilizationmethodsonthepropertiesofamedicalgradeplgacopolymer AT pierreguerreschi effectsoftwomeltextrusionbasedadditivemanufacturingtechnologiesandcommonsterilizationmethodsonthepropertiesofamedicalgradeplgacopolymer AT philippemarchetti effectsoftwomeltextrusionbasedadditivemanufacturingtechnologiesandcommonsterilizationmethodsonthepropertiesofamedicalgradeplgacopolymer AT nicolasblanchemain effectsoftwomeltextrusionbasedadditivemanufacturingtechnologiesandcommonsterilizationmethodsonthepropertiesofamedicalgradeplgacopolymer |
_version_ |
1724269438343053312 |