Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION:Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disabili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bryn Hilton, Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell, Benjamin Davies, Mark Kotter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709
id doaj-c0fa7fbd90ba4d86b9bbc9b2ca59d014
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0fa7fbd90ba4d86b9bbc9b2ca59d0142021-03-03T21:02:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011312e020770910.1371/journal.pone.0207709Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.Bryn HiltonJennifer Tempest-MitchellBenjamin DaviesMark KotterINTRODUCTION:Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disability and limit recovery. The nature of early DCM symptoms is unknown, moreover it has been suggested incomplete examination contributes to missed diagnosis. This study examines how DCM is currently assessed, if assessment differs between stages of healthcare, and whether this influences patient management. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS:Cervical MRI scans (N = 1123) at a tertiary neurosciences center, over a single year, were screened for patients with DCM (N = 43). Signs, symptoms, and disease severity of DCM were extracted from patient records. Patients were considered at 3 phases of clinical assessment: primary care, secondary care, and surgical assessment. RESULTS:Upper limb paraesthesia and urinary dysfunction were consistently the most and least prevalent symptoms respectively. Differences between assessing clinicians were present in the reporting of: limb pain (p<0.005), objective limb weakness (p = 0.01), hyperreflexia (p<0.005), Hoffmann reflex (p<0.005), extensor plantar reflex (p = 0.007), and lower limb spasticity (p<0.005). Pathological reflexes were least frequently assessed by primary care doctors. CONCLUSION:DCM assessment varies significantly between assessors. Reporting of key features of DCM is especially low in primary care. Incomplete assessment may hinder early diagnosis and referral to spinal surgery.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bryn Hilton
Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell
Benjamin Davies
Mark Kotter
spellingShingle Bryn Hilton
Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell
Benjamin Davies
Mark Kotter
Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Bryn Hilton
Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell
Benjamin Davies
Mark Kotter
author_sort Bryn Hilton
title Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
title_short Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
title_full Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
title_fullStr Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
title_sort assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disability and limit recovery. The nature of early DCM symptoms is unknown, moreover it has been suggested incomplete examination contributes to missed diagnosis. This study examines how DCM is currently assessed, if assessment differs between stages of healthcare, and whether this influences patient management. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS:Cervical MRI scans (N = 1123) at a tertiary neurosciences center, over a single year, were screened for patients with DCM (N = 43). Signs, symptoms, and disease severity of DCM were extracted from patient records. Patients were considered at 3 phases of clinical assessment: primary care, secondary care, and surgical assessment. RESULTS:Upper limb paraesthesia and urinary dysfunction were consistently the most and least prevalent symptoms respectively. Differences between assessing clinicians were present in the reporting of: limb pain (p<0.005), objective limb weakness (p = 0.01), hyperreflexia (p<0.005), Hoffmann reflex (p<0.005), extensor plantar reflex (p = 0.007), and lower limb spasticity (p<0.005). Pathological reflexes were least frequently assessed by primary care doctors. CONCLUSION:DCM assessment varies significantly between assessors. Reporting of key features of DCM is especially low in primary care. Incomplete assessment may hinder early diagnosis and referral to spinal surgery.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709
work_keys_str_mv AT brynhilton assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes
AT jennifertempestmitchell assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes
AT benjamindavies assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes
AT markkotter assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes
_version_ 1714819199444975616