Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.
INTRODUCTION:Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disabili...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709 |
id |
doaj-c0fa7fbd90ba4d86b9bbc9b2ca59d014 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0fa7fbd90ba4d86b9bbc9b2ca59d0142021-03-03T21:02:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011312e020770910.1371/journal.pone.0207709Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes.Bryn HiltonJennifer Tempest-MitchellBenjamin DaviesMark KotterINTRODUCTION:Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disability and limit recovery. The nature of early DCM symptoms is unknown, moreover it has been suggested incomplete examination contributes to missed diagnosis. This study examines how DCM is currently assessed, if assessment differs between stages of healthcare, and whether this influences patient management. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS:Cervical MRI scans (N = 1123) at a tertiary neurosciences center, over a single year, were screened for patients with DCM (N = 43). Signs, symptoms, and disease severity of DCM were extracted from patient records. Patients were considered at 3 phases of clinical assessment: primary care, secondary care, and surgical assessment. RESULTS:Upper limb paraesthesia and urinary dysfunction were consistently the most and least prevalent symptoms respectively. Differences between assessing clinicians were present in the reporting of: limb pain (p<0.005), objective limb weakness (p = 0.01), hyperreflexia (p<0.005), Hoffmann reflex (p<0.005), extensor plantar reflex (p = 0.007), and lower limb spasticity (p<0.005). Pathological reflexes were least frequently assessed by primary care doctors. CONCLUSION:DCM assessment varies significantly between assessors. Reporting of key features of DCM is especially low in primary care. Incomplete assessment may hinder early diagnosis and referral to spinal surgery.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bryn Hilton Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell Benjamin Davies Mark Kotter |
spellingShingle |
Bryn Hilton Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell Benjamin Davies Mark Kotter Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Bryn Hilton Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell Benjamin Davies Mark Kotter |
author_sort |
Bryn Hilton |
title |
Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes. |
title_short |
Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes. |
title_full |
Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes. |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes. |
title_sort |
assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy differs between specialists and may influence time to diagnosis and clinical outcomes. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
INTRODUCTION:Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [DCM] often presents with non-specific symptoms and signs. It progresses insidiously and leads to permanent neurological dysfunction. Decompressive surgery can halt disease progression, however significant delays in diagnosis result in increased disability and limit recovery. The nature of early DCM symptoms is unknown, moreover it has been suggested incomplete examination contributes to missed diagnosis. This study examines how DCM is currently assessed, if assessment differs between stages of healthcare, and whether this influences patient management. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS:Cervical MRI scans (N = 1123) at a tertiary neurosciences center, over a single year, were screened for patients with DCM (N = 43). Signs, symptoms, and disease severity of DCM were extracted from patient records. Patients were considered at 3 phases of clinical assessment: primary care, secondary care, and surgical assessment. RESULTS:Upper limb paraesthesia and urinary dysfunction were consistently the most and least prevalent symptoms respectively. Differences between assessing clinicians were present in the reporting of: limb pain (p<0.005), objective limb weakness (p = 0.01), hyperreflexia (p<0.005), Hoffmann reflex (p<0.005), extensor plantar reflex (p = 0.007), and lower limb spasticity (p<0.005). Pathological reflexes were least frequently assessed by primary care doctors. CONCLUSION:DCM assessment varies significantly between assessors. Reporting of key features of DCM is especially low in primary care. Incomplete assessment may hinder early diagnosis and referral to spinal surgery. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207709 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brynhilton assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes AT jennifertempestmitchell assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes AT benjamindavies assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes AT markkotter assessmentofdegenerativecervicalmyelopathydiffersbetweenspecialistsandmayinfluencetimetodiagnosisandclinicaloutcomes |
_version_ |
1714819199444975616 |