The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment
Accurate detection of subjective refraction is important to provide patients with the best visual quality. One of the factors affecting detection of subjective refraction is viewing distance. Lack of requirements for optometric office arrangement and required space dimensions leads to smaller optome...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Estonian Academy Publishers
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://kirj.ee/wp-content/plugins/kirj/pub/proc-4S-2021-317-325_20210929100221.pdf |
id |
doaj-c0d76693c8074440846951ac0a739420 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0d76693c8074440846951ac0a7394202021-10-09T15:40:29ZengEstonian Academy PublishersProceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences1736-60461736-75302021-09-01704S31732510.3176/proc.2021.4S.0210.3176/proc.2021.4S.02The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessmentAlina Kucika0Tatjana Patrova1Ilona Rumjanceva2Aiga Svede3Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004, Riga, LatviaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004, Riga, LatviaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004, Riga, LatviaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Optometry, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004, Riga, LatviaAccurate detection of subjective refraction is important to provide patients with the best visual quality. One of the factors affecting detection of subjective refraction is viewing distance. Lack of requirements for optometric office arrangement and required space dimensions leads to smaller optometric offices that provide shorter distance between the patient and the optotype chart. However, the effect of decreased viewing distance on detected subjective refraction remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of viewing distance on the assessment of subjective refraction. Two types of subjective refraction of the dominant eye were determined in 45 participants at five viewing distances (6 m, 5 m, 4 m, 3 m, and 2.5 m): subjective refraction that ensured visual acuity 1.0 (in decimal units) and maximum subjective refraction that ensured the best corrected visual acuity. The results demonstrated that viewing distance significantly affected the outcome of subjective refraction detection; there were hyperopic shifts in all types of refractions that increased as the viewing distance decreased. To conclude, the most appropriate viewing distance for subjective refraction detection is 5 m or 6 m. If viewing distance is reduced to 4 m or less, a negative spherical lens of the corresponding proximity should be added to the obtained subjective refraction as it cannot be reliably stated that ocular accommodation is fully relaxed. Since this is not always achievable by 0.25 D steps, mirror systems should be used in smaller (3 m and closer viewing distances) optometric offices to provide more appropriate subjective refraction detection.https://kirj.ee/wp-content/plugins/kirj/pub/proc-4S-2021-317-325_20210929100221.pdfoptometryviewing distancesubjective refractionoptometric officevisual acuity. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alina Kucika Tatjana Patrova Ilona Rumjanceva Aiga Svede |
spellingShingle |
Alina Kucika Tatjana Patrova Ilona Rumjanceva Aiga Svede The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences optometry viewing distance subjective refraction optometric office visual acuity. |
author_facet |
Alina Kucika Tatjana Patrova Ilona Rumjanceva Aiga Svede |
author_sort |
Alina Kucika |
title |
The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment |
title_short |
The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment |
title_full |
The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment |
title_fullStr |
The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment |
title_sort |
effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment |
publisher |
Estonian Academy Publishers |
series |
Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences |
issn |
1736-6046 1736-7530 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Accurate detection of subjective refraction is important to provide patients with the best visual quality. One of the factors affecting detection of subjective refraction is viewing distance. Lack of requirements for optometric office arrangement and required space dimensions leads to smaller optometric offices that provide shorter distance between the patient and the optotype chart. However, the effect of decreased viewing distance on detected subjective refraction remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of viewing distance on the assessment of subjective refraction. Two types of subjective refraction of the dominant eye were determined in 45 participants at five viewing distances (6 m, 5 m, 4 m, 3 m, and 2.5 m): subjective refraction that ensured visual acuity 1.0 (in decimal units) and maximum subjective refraction that ensured the best corrected visual acuity. The results demonstrated that viewing distance significantly affected the outcome of subjective refraction detection; there were hyperopic shifts in all types of refractions that increased as the viewing distance decreased. To conclude, the most appropriate viewing distance for subjective refraction detection is 5 m or 6 m. If viewing distance is reduced to 4 m or less, a negative spherical lens of the corresponding proximity should be added to the obtained subjective refraction as it cannot be reliably stated that ocular accommodation is fully relaxed. Since this is not always achievable by 0.25 D steps, mirror systems should be used in smaller (3 m and closer viewing distances) optometric offices to provide more appropriate subjective refraction detection. |
topic |
optometry viewing distance subjective refraction optometric office visual acuity. |
url |
https://kirj.ee/wp-content/plugins/kirj/pub/proc-4S-2021-317-325_20210929100221.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alinakucika theeffectofviewingdistanceonsubjectiverefractionassessment AT tatjanapatrova theeffectofviewingdistanceonsubjectiverefractionassessment AT ilonarumjanceva theeffectofviewingdistanceonsubjectiverefractionassessment AT aigasvede theeffectofviewingdistanceonsubjectiverefractionassessment AT alinakucika effectofviewingdistanceonsubjectiverefractionassessment AT tatjanapatrova effectofviewingdistanceonsubjectiverefractionassessment AT ilonarumjanceva effectofviewingdistanceonsubjectiverefractionassessment AT aigasvede effectofviewingdistanceonsubjectiverefractionassessment |
_version_ |
1716830475847204864 |