Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of a musculoskeletal oncology training module during residency. Methods. 24 orthopaedic residents with differing years of experience were recruited. 12 of them received musculoskeletal oncology training for 6 months. The remaining 12 were controls who did not attend...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neil G Burke, Cathal J Moran, Brian Hurson, Sean Dudeney, Gary C O'Toole
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900318
id doaj-c0d5de319acc4d978ca0c100124248f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0d5de319acc4d978ca0c100124248f12020-11-25T03:16:58ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902011-12-011910.1177/230949901101900318Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during ResidencyNeil G Burke0Cathal J Moran1Brian Hurson2Sean Dudeney3Gary C O'Toole4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, IrelandPurpose. To evaluate the efficacy of a musculoskeletal oncology training module during residency. Methods. 24 orthopaedic residents with differing years of experience were recruited. 12 of them received musculoskeletal oncology training for 6 months. The remaining 12 were controls who did not attend the training and had no clinical experience in a musculoskeletal oncology unit but had at least 3 years of postgraduate surgical training. Upon completion, residents in both groups were assessed by a knowledge test and then an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results. Residents who attended the training module had better mean knowledge test scores (48 vs 25 out of 58, p<0.0001) and OSCE scores (32 vs 22 out of 42, p<0.004), compared to those who did not attend. No residents who attended the training module marked an inappropriate biopsy site that would have compromised definitive surgery, compared to 5 (42%) of the untrained residents who marked an inappropriate biopsy site that may have resulted in an unnecessary amputation. All residents who attended the training module agreed that such a module should be included in the orthopaedic residency programme. Conclusion. Residents who attended the training module were more aware of the biopsy principles and risks. A training module for musculoskeletal oncology should be included in the orthopaedic residency programme.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900318
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neil G Burke
Cathal J Moran
Brian Hurson
Sean Dudeney
Gary C O'Toole
spellingShingle Neil G Burke
Cathal J Moran
Brian Hurson
Sean Dudeney
Gary C O'Toole
Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Neil G Burke
Cathal J Moran
Brian Hurson
Sean Dudeney
Gary C O'Toole
author_sort Neil G Burke
title Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency
title_short Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency
title_full Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency
title_fullStr Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency
title_full_unstemmed Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency
title_sort musculoskeletal oncology training during residency
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2011-12-01
description Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of a musculoskeletal oncology training module during residency. Methods. 24 orthopaedic residents with differing years of experience were recruited. 12 of them received musculoskeletal oncology training for 6 months. The remaining 12 were controls who did not attend the training and had no clinical experience in a musculoskeletal oncology unit but had at least 3 years of postgraduate surgical training. Upon completion, residents in both groups were assessed by a knowledge test and then an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results. Residents who attended the training module had better mean knowledge test scores (48 vs 25 out of 58, p<0.0001) and OSCE scores (32 vs 22 out of 42, p<0.004), compared to those who did not attend. No residents who attended the training module marked an inappropriate biopsy site that would have compromised definitive surgery, compared to 5 (42%) of the untrained residents who marked an inappropriate biopsy site that may have resulted in an unnecessary amputation. All residents who attended the training module agreed that such a module should be included in the orthopaedic residency programme. Conclusion. Residents who attended the training module were more aware of the biopsy principles and risks. A training module for musculoskeletal oncology should be included in the orthopaedic residency programme.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900318
work_keys_str_mv AT neilgburke musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency
AT cathaljmoran musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency
AT brianhurson musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency
AT seandudeney musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency
AT garycotoole musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency
_version_ 1724633871618670592