Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency
Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of a musculoskeletal oncology training module during residency. Methods. 24 orthopaedic residents with differing years of experience were recruited. 12 of them received musculoskeletal oncology training for 6 months. The remaining 12 were controls who did not attend...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900318 |
id |
doaj-c0d5de319acc4d978ca0c100124248f1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0d5de319acc4d978ca0c100124248f12020-11-25T03:16:58ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902011-12-011910.1177/230949901101900318Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during ResidencyNeil G Burke0Cathal J Moran1Brian Hurson2Sean Dudeney3Gary C O'Toole4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, IrelandPurpose. To evaluate the efficacy of a musculoskeletal oncology training module during residency. Methods. 24 orthopaedic residents with differing years of experience were recruited. 12 of them received musculoskeletal oncology training for 6 months. The remaining 12 were controls who did not attend the training and had no clinical experience in a musculoskeletal oncology unit but had at least 3 years of postgraduate surgical training. Upon completion, residents in both groups were assessed by a knowledge test and then an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results. Residents who attended the training module had better mean knowledge test scores (48 vs 25 out of 58, p<0.0001) and OSCE scores (32 vs 22 out of 42, p<0.004), compared to those who did not attend. No residents who attended the training module marked an inappropriate biopsy site that would have compromised definitive surgery, compared to 5 (42%) of the untrained residents who marked an inappropriate biopsy site that may have resulted in an unnecessary amputation. All residents who attended the training module agreed that such a module should be included in the orthopaedic residency programme. Conclusion. Residents who attended the training module were more aware of the biopsy principles and risks. A training module for musculoskeletal oncology should be included in the orthopaedic residency programme.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900318 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Neil G Burke Cathal J Moran Brian Hurson Sean Dudeney Gary C O'Toole |
spellingShingle |
Neil G Burke Cathal J Moran Brian Hurson Sean Dudeney Gary C O'Toole Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
author_facet |
Neil G Burke Cathal J Moran Brian Hurson Sean Dudeney Gary C O'Toole |
author_sort |
Neil G Burke |
title |
Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency |
title_short |
Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency |
title_full |
Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency |
title_fullStr |
Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency |
title_full_unstemmed |
Musculoskeletal Oncology Training during Residency |
title_sort |
musculoskeletal oncology training during residency |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
issn |
2309-4990 |
publishDate |
2011-12-01 |
description |
Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of a musculoskeletal oncology training module during residency. Methods. 24 orthopaedic residents with differing years of experience were recruited. 12 of them received musculoskeletal oncology training for 6 months. The remaining 12 were controls who did not attend the training and had no clinical experience in a musculoskeletal oncology unit but had at least 3 years of postgraduate surgical training. Upon completion, residents in both groups were assessed by a knowledge test and then an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Results. Residents who attended the training module had better mean knowledge test scores (48 vs 25 out of 58, p<0.0001) and OSCE scores (32 vs 22 out of 42, p<0.004), compared to those who did not attend. No residents who attended the training module marked an inappropriate biopsy site that would have compromised definitive surgery, compared to 5 (42%) of the untrained residents who marked an inappropriate biopsy site that may have resulted in an unnecessary amputation. All residents who attended the training module agreed that such a module should be included in the orthopaedic residency programme. Conclusion. Residents who attended the training module were more aware of the biopsy principles and risks. A training module for musculoskeletal oncology should be included in the orthopaedic residency programme. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900318 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT neilgburke musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency AT cathaljmoran musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency AT brianhurson musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency AT seandudeney musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency AT garycotoole musculoskeletaloncologytrainingduringresidency |
_version_ |
1724633871618670592 |