EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase

The ongoing pilot phase of the European Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) tests the PEF method and develops product category-specific rules (PEFCRs) for selected product categories. The goal of PEF is to address all relevant environmental impacts and the full life cycle of products is acknowledg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annekatrin Lehmann, Vanessa Bach, Matthias Finkbeiner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
PEF
LCA
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/1/92
id doaj-c0d5a74de2a44680ab92276fe0721822
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0d5a74de2a44680ab92276fe07218222020-11-24T23:23:20ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502016-01-01819210.3390/su8010092su8010092EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot PhaseAnnekatrin Lehmann0Vanessa Bach1Matthias Finkbeiner2Department of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Sustainable Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Sustainable Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Sustainable Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, GermanyThe ongoing pilot phase of the European Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) tests the PEF method and develops product category-specific rules (PEFCRs) for selected product categories. The goal of PEF is to address all relevant environmental impacts and the full life cycle of products is acknowledged. However, PEF faces several methodological and practical challenges. This paper presents key findings of a comprehensive analysis of the current status of the PEF pilot phase (mainly based on the evaluation of all draft PEFCRs). Remaining key challenges are: (1) the still open goal and policy outcome of the PEF process; (2) the difficult applicability and, thus, the unclear tangible added value of some PEF rules compared to current life cycle assessment (LCA) practice; (3) the insufficient maturity level of some predefined impact assessment methods and missing reliable methods for prioritizing impact categories; and (4) the fact that, in the worst case, the developed PEFCRs may not support a fair comparability of products. This “mid-term review” of the PEF pilot phase shows that the PEF method and the PEFCRs need to be further improved and refined for a successful policy implementation of PEF, but also for avoiding that unsolved issues of PEF affect the LCA method as such.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/1/92Product Environmental FootprintPEFpilot phaseLCAISO 14044comparabilitypolicy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annekatrin Lehmann
Vanessa Bach
Matthias Finkbeiner
spellingShingle Annekatrin Lehmann
Vanessa Bach
Matthias Finkbeiner
EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase
Sustainability
Product Environmental Footprint
PEF
pilot phase
LCA
ISO 14044
comparability
policy
author_facet Annekatrin Lehmann
Vanessa Bach
Matthias Finkbeiner
author_sort Annekatrin Lehmann
title EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase
title_short EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase
title_full EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase
title_fullStr EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase
title_full_unstemmed EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase
title_sort eu product environmental footprint—mid-term review of the pilot phase
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The ongoing pilot phase of the European Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) tests the PEF method and develops product category-specific rules (PEFCRs) for selected product categories. The goal of PEF is to address all relevant environmental impacts and the full life cycle of products is acknowledged. However, PEF faces several methodological and practical challenges. This paper presents key findings of a comprehensive analysis of the current status of the PEF pilot phase (mainly based on the evaluation of all draft PEFCRs). Remaining key challenges are: (1) the still open goal and policy outcome of the PEF process; (2) the difficult applicability and, thus, the unclear tangible added value of some PEF rules compared to current life cycle assessment (LCA) practice; (3) the insufficient maturity level of some predefined impact assessment methods and missing reliable methods for prioritizing impact categories; and (4) the fact that, in the worst case, the developed PEFCRs may not support a fair comparability of products. This “mid-term review” of the PEF pilot phase shows that the PEF method and the PEFCRs need to be further improved and refined for a successful policy implementation of PEF, but also for avoiding that unsolved issues of PEF affect the LCA method as such.
topic Product Environmental Footprint
PEF
pilot phase
LCA
ISO 14044
comparability
policy
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/1/92
work_keys_str_mv AT annekatrinlehmann euproductenvironmentalfootprintmidtermreviewofthepilotphase
AT vanessabach euproductenvironmentalfootprintmidtermreviewofthepilotphase
AT matthiasfinkbeiner euproductenvironmentalfootprintmidtermreviewofthepilotphase
_version_ 1725564043604787200