Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
Reliable serologic tests are needed for diagnosis and surveillance of Zika virus infection. We evaluated the Euroimmun and Dia.Pro serologic tests for detection of Zika virus IgM and IgG by using a panel of 199 samples from a region endemic for flaviviruses. Kinetics of Zika virus antibodies were mo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Emerging Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/6/18-0361_article |
id |
doaj-c0cb349e9db64015bbbeb3919b3acb3d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0cb349e9db64015bbbeb3919b3acb3d2020-11-25T00:20:49ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592019-06-012561153116010.3201/eid2506.180361Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus InfectionSéverine MatheusCheikh TallaBhety LabeauFranck de LavalSébastien BriolantLena BerthelotMuriel VrayDominique RoussetReliable serologic tests are needed for diagnosis and surveillance of Zika virus infection. We evaluated the Euroimmun and Dia.Pro serologic tests for detection of Zika virus IgM and IgG by using a panel of 199 samples from a region endemic for flaviviruses. Kinetics of Zika virus antibodies were monitored from 300 sequential specimens sampled over a period of 10 months after infection. We observed suboptimal performance; sensitivity for Zika virus IgM was low, especially in the Euroimmun assay (49%), whereas IgM could be detected for months with the Dia.pro assay. The specificity of the Zika virus IgG assays was also low, especially that of Dia.Pro (62%); findings were strongly influenced by the epidemiologic context. These results highlight the complexity of serologic diagnosis of Zika virus infection in regions endemic for flaviviruses. Accurate analysis of the performance of assays is required to adapt and interpret algorithms.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/6/18-0361_articleZika virusserologysensitivityspecificitycross reactionsantibody kinetics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Séverine Matheus Cheikh Talla Bhety Labeau Franck de Laval Sébastien Briolant Lena Berthelot Muriel Vray Dominique Rousset |
spellingShingle |
Séverine Matheus Cheikh Talla Bhety Labeau Franck de Laval Sébastien Briolant Lena Berthelot Muriel Vray Dominique Rousset Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection Emerging Infectious Diseases Zika virus serology sensitivity specificity cross reactions antibody kinetics |
author_facet |
Séverine Matheus Cheikh Talla Bhety Labeau Franck de Laval Sébastien Briolant Lena Berthelot Muriel Vray Dominique Rousset |
author_sort |
Séverine Matheus |
title |
Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_short |
Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_full |
Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_fullStr |
Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection |
title_sort |
performance of 2 commercial serologic tests for diagnosing zika virus infection |
publisher |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
series |
Emerging Infectious Diseases |
issn |
1080-6040 1080-6059 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Reliable serologic tests are needed for diagnosis and surveillance of Zika virus infection. We evaluated the Euroimmun and Dia.Pro serologic tests for detection of Zika virus IgM and IgG by using a panel of 199 samples from a region endemic for flaviviruses. Kinetics of Zika virus antibodies were monitored from 300 sequential specimens sampled over a period of 10 months after infection. We observed suboptimal performance; sensitivity for Zika virus IgM was low, especially in the Euroimmun assay (49%), whereas IgM could be detected for months with the Dia.pro assay. The specificity of the Zika virus IgG assays was also low, especially that of Dia.Pro (62%); findings were strongly influenced by the epidemiologic context. These results highlight the complexity of serologic diagnosis of Zika virus infection in regions endemic for flaviviruses. Accurate analysis of the performance of assays is required to adapt and interpret algorithms. |
topic |
Zika virus serology sensitivity specificity cross reactions antibody kinetics |
url |
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/6/18-0361_article |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT severinematheus performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT cheikhtalla performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT bhetylabeau performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT franckdelaval performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT sebastienbriolant performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT lenaberthelot performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT murielvray performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection AT dominiquerousset performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection |
_version_ |
1725365732716314624 |