A bibliometric analysis of Bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018

Aim: Bibliometrics is a recent field and is performed to quantitatively assess the academic quality of journals or authors using statistical procedures such as citation rates, contents, authorship relations and productivity. Although anthrax still remains important globally, the scientific literatur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ünsal Savcı
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2019-09-01
Series:Journal of Surgery and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/josam/issue/48398/618738
id doaj-c0cb0dc559ca4f5d919a3890a3416169
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0cb0dc559ca4f5d919a3890a34161692021-05-20T06:35:14ZengJournal of Surgery and MedicineJournal of Surgery and Medicine2602-20792019-09-013966667110.28982/josam.6187381122A bibliometric analysis of Bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018Ünsal Savcı0ÇORUM T.C. SB. HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÇORUM EROL OLÇOK EĞİTİM VE ARAŞTIRMA HASTANESİAim: Bibliometrics is a recent field and is performed to quantitatively assess the academic quality of journals or authors using statistical procedures such as citation rates, contents, authorship relations and productivity. Although anthrax still remains important globally, the scientific literature lacks a bibliometric assessment of the anthrax literature. In this study, it is aimed to perform the bibliometric analysis of anthrax.Methods: The data in this study were extracted from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA) from 1975 to December 2018. The database is accessible back to 1975 and we searched all documents using keywords [Bacillus anthracis OR anthrax] in the “Title” field.Results: WoS database search recorded a total of 5557 publications. More than half of the publications were original articles (n=3828, 68.8%). The country with the greatest number of publications was the United States of America (n=3203), followed by England (n=301) and France (n=264). The Center for Disease Control and Prevention had the most published documents about anthrax with 210 papers and 3.7% of the total literature. The most productive authors are Leppla SH, Collier RJ, and Mock M (n=236, 124, 101 documents), respectively. The most productive journal was Infection and Immunity, which covered 4.3% of the publications with 241 manuscripts.Conclusion: In this first bibliometric study in the literature about anthrax we found that nonendemic developed countries dominated the anthrax literature. This study will encourage further studies about the investigation of anthrax, which is endemic in some parts of the world.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/josam/issue/48398/618738bibliometricscitation analysisanthraxbacillus anthracisbibliyometriatıf analizişarbonbacillus anthracis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ünsal Savcı
spellingShingle Ünsal Savcı
A bibliometric analysis of Bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018
Journal of Surgery and Medicine
bibliometrics
citation analysis
anthrax
bacillus anthracis
bibliyometri
atıf analizi
şarbon
bacillus anthracis
author_facet Ünsal Savcı
author_sort Ünsal Savcı
title A bibliometric analysis of Bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018
title_short A bibliometric analysis of Bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018
title_full A bibliometric analysis of Bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018
title_fullStr A bibliometric analysis of Bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018
title_full_unstemmed A bibliometric analysis of Bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018
title_sort bibliometric analysis of bacillus anthracis research published between 1975 and 2018
publisher Journal of Surgery and Medicine
series Journal of Surgery and Medicine
issn 2602-2079
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Aim: Bibliometrics is a recent field and is performed to quantitatively assess the academic quality of journals or authors using statistical procedures such as citation rates, contents, authorship relations and productivity. Although anthrax still remains important globally, the scientific literature lacks a bibliometric assessment of the anthrax literature. In this study, it is aimed to perform the bibliometric analysis of anthrax.Methods: The data in this study were extracted from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA) from 1975 to December 2018. The database is accessible back to 1975 and we searched all documents using keywords [Bacillus anthracis OR anthrax] in the “Title” field.Results: WoS database search recorded a total of 5557 publications. More than half of the publications were original articles (n=3828, 68.8%). The country with the greatest number of publications was the United States of America (n=3203), followed by England (n=301) and France (n=264). The Center for Disease Control and Prevention had the most published documents about anthrax with 210 papers and 3.7% of the total literature. The most productive authors are Leppla SH, Collier RJ, and Mock M (n=236, 124, 101 documents), respectively. The most productive journal was Infection and Immunity, which covered 4.3% of the publications with 241 manuscripts.Conclusion: In this first bibliometric study in the literature about anthrax we found that nonendemic developed countries dominated the anthrax literature. This study will encourage further studies about the investigation of anthrax, which is endemic in some parts of the world.
topic bibliometrics
citation analysis
anthrax
bacillus anthracis
bibliyometri
atıf analizi
şarbon
bacillus anthracis
url https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/josam/issue/48398/618738
work_keys_str_mv AT unsalsavcı abibliometricanalysisofbacillusanthracisresearchpublishedbetween1975and2018
AT unsalsavcı bibliometricanalysisofbacillusanthracisresearchpublishedbetween1975and2018
_version_ 1721435711793528832