The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century

New technologies combined with the internet have fundamentally altered our ability to have control over the diffusion of information and its impact on human behaviour. This paper explains this change as well as the transformation of the concept of privacy itself. The main part of the paper analyses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zdenek Kuhn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2018-12-01
Series:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/304
id doaj-c0c316a0b013481d9a9d032855c8269f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0c316a0b013481d9a9d032855c8269f2020-11-25T04:08:57ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of LawCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy1845-56621848-99582018-12-011424125310.3935/cyelp.14.2018.302The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st CenturyZdenek Kuhn0Charles University Prague & Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech RepublicNew technologies combined with the internet have fundamentally altered our ability to have control over the diffusion of information and its impact on human behaviour. This paper explains this change as well as the transformation of the concept of privacy itself. The main part of the paper analyses the case law relating to local activities such as CCTV cameras in private buildings which serve to protect the property of the camera system operators. The author defends the regulation of privacy against the intrusions of providers of telecommunications and data services and corporations such as Google and Facebook. This should be exercised by the law of the EU because autonomous domestic regulation would endanger the free movement of services across the EU. Moreover, it would be difficult for separate national regulation to be successful in fighting global corporations like Google. On the other hand, there is not much sense in the European regulation of activities that are local by their very nature, such as the use of CCTV cameras in private buildings to protect the camera system operators’ property.https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/304privacynew technologiesfree movement of servicesinternetcctv cameras
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zdenek Kuhn
spellingShingle Zdenek Kuhn
The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
privacy
new technologies
free movement of services
internet
cctv cameras
author_facet Zdenek Kuhn
author_sort Zdenek Kuhn
title The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century
title_short The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century
title_full The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century
title_fullStr The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century
title_full_unstemmed The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century
title_sort ryneš case and liability for invasion of privacy in the 21st century
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
series Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
issn 1845-5662
1848-9958
publishDate 2018-12-01
description New technologies combined with the internet have fundamentally altered our ability to have control over the diffusion of information and its impact on human behaviour. This paper explains this change as well as the transformation of the concept of privacy itself. The main part of the paper analyses the case law relating to local activities such as CCTV cameras in private buildings which serve to protect the property of the camera system operators. The author defends the regulation of privacy against the intrusions of providers of telecommunications and data services and corporations such as Google and Facebook. This should be exercised by the law of the EU because autonomous domestic regulation would endanger the free movement of services across the EU. Moreover, it would be difficult for separate national regulation to be successful in fighting global corporations like Google. On the other hand, there is not much sense in the European regulation of activities that are local by their very nature, such as the use of CCTV cameras in private buildings to protect the camera system operators’ property.
topic privacy
new technologies
free movement of services
internet
cctv cameras
url https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/304
work_keys_str_mv AT zdenekkuhn therynescaseandliabilityforinvasionofprivacyinthe21stcentury
AT zdenekkuhn rynescaseandliabilityforinvasionofprivacyinthe21stcentury
_version_ 1724423900746481664