Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills

The aim of this study was to develop and validate three instruments which measure knowledge about searching for and critically appraising scientific articles (evidence-based practice-EBP). Twenty-three questions were collected from previous studies and modified by an expert panel. These questions we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Bradley, Jeph Herrin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2004-01-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Online Access:http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/res00096.pdf
id doaj-c0b374dc67df4d3d8dea0ac57554627b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0b374dc67df4d3d8dea0ac57554627b2020-11-25T01:29:49ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812004-01-011515Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching SkillsPeter BradleyJeph HerrinThe aim of this study was to develop and validate three instruments which measure knowledge about searching for and critically appraising scientific articles (evidence-based practice-EBP). Twenty-three questions were collected from previous studies and modified by an expert panel. These questions were then administered to 55 delegates before and after two international conferences in EBP; the responses were assessed for discriminative ability and internal consistency. Five questions were discarded and three instruments of six questions each were developed. Finally, the instruments were re-validated in a randomized controlled trial comparing two educational interventions at the University of Oslo, Norway by 166 of 175 eligible medical students. In the re-validation, the instruments showed satisfactory level of discriminate validity (p<0.05), but borderline levels of internal consistency (Cronbachs a 0.52-0.61). More research is needed to develop a suitable instrument which includes questions on searching for evidence.http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/res00096.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Bradley
Jeph Herrin
spellingShingle Peter Bradley
Jeph Herrin
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills
Medical Education Online
author_facet Peter Bradley
Jeph Herrin
author_sort Peter Bradley
title Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills
title_short Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills
title_full Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills
title_fullStr Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills
title_sort development and validation of an instrument to measure knowledge of evidence-based practice and searching skills
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Medical Education Online
issn 1087-2981
publishDate 2004-01-01
description The aim of this study was to develop and validate three instruments which measure knowledge about searching for and critically appraising scientific articles (evidence-based practice-EBP). Twenty-three questions were collected from previous studies and modified by an expert panel. These questions were then administered to 55 delegates before and after two international conferences in EBP; the responses were assessed for discriminative ability and internal consistency. Five questions were discarded and three instruments of six questions each were developed. Finally, the instruments were re-validated in a randomized controlled trial comparing two educational interventions at the University of Oslo, Norway by 166 of 175 eligible medical students. In the re-validation, the instruments showed satisfactory level of discriminate validity (p<0.05), but borderline levels of internal consistency (Cronbachs a 0.52-0.61). More research is needed to develop a suitable instrument which includes questions on searching for evidence.
url http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/res00096.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbradley developmentandvalidationofaninstrumenttomeasureknowledgeofevidencebasedpracticeandsearchingskills
AT jephherrin developmentandvalidationofaninstrumenttomeasureknowledgeofevidencebasedpracticeandsearchingskills
_version_ 1725094576773922816