Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills
The aim of this study was to develop and validate three instruments which measure knowledge about searching for and critically appraising scientific articles (evidence-based practice-EBP). Twenty-three questions were collected from previous studies and modified by an expert panel. These questions we...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2004-01-01
|
Series: | Medical Education Online |
Online Access: | http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/res00096.pdf |
id |
doaj-c0b374dc67df4d3d8dea0ac57554627b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0b374dc67df4d3d8dea0ac57554627b2020-11-25T01:29:49ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812004-01-011515Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching SkillsPeter BradleyJeph HerrinThe aim of this study was to develop and validate three instruments which measure knowledge about searching for and critically appraising scientific articles (evidence-based practice-EBP). Twenty-three questions were collected from previous studies and modified by an expert panel. These questions were then administered to 55 delegates before and after two international conferences in EBP; the responses were assessed for discriminative ability and internal consistency. Five questions were discarded and three instruments of six questions each were developed. Finally, the instruments were re-validated in a randomized controlled trial comparing two educational interventions at the University of Oslo, Norway by 166 of 175 eligible medical students. In the re-validation, the instruments showed satisfactory level of discriminate validity (p<0.05), but borderline levels of internal consistency (Cronbachs a 0.52-0.61). More research is needed to develop a suitable instrument which includes questions on searching for evidence.http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/res00096.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter Bradley Jeph Herrin |
spellingShingle |
Peter Bradley Jeph Herrin Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills Medical Education Online |
author_facet |
Peter Bradley Jeph Herrin |
author_sort |
Peter Bradley |
title |
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills |
title_short |
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills |
title_full |
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills |
title_fullStr |
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice and Searching Skills |
title_sort |
development and validation of an instrument to measure knowledge of evidence-based practice and searching skills |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Medical Education Online |
issn |
1087-2981 |
publishDate |
2004-01-01 |
description |
The aim of this study was to develop and validate three instruments which measure knowledge about searching for and critically appraising scientific articles (evidence-based practice-EBP). Twenty-three questions were collected from previous studies and modified by an expert panel. These questions were then administered to 55 delegates before and after two international conferences in EBP; the responses were assessed for discriminative ability and internal consistency. Five questions were discarded and three instruments of six questions each were developed. Finally, the instruments were re-validated in a randomized controlled trial comparing two educational interventions at the University of Oslo, Norway by 166 of 175 eligible medical students. In the re-validation, the instruments showed satisfactory level of discriminate validity (p<0.05), but borderline levels of internal consistency (Cronbachs a 0.52-0.61). More research is needed to develop a suitable instrument which includes questions on searching for evidence. |
url |
http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/res00096.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterbradley developmentandvalidationofaninstrumenttomeasureknowledgeofevidencebasedpracticeandsearchingskills AT jephherrin developmentandvalidationofaninstrumenttomeasureknowledgeofevidencebasedpracticeandsearchingskills |
_version_ |
1725094576773922816 |