Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception

Abstract Linguistic labels exert a particularly strong top-down influence on perception. The potency of this influence has been ascribed to their ability to evoke category-diagnostic features of concepts. In doing this, they facilitate the formation of a perceptual template concordant with those fea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ksenija Slivac, Alexis Hervais-Adelman, Peter Hagoort, Monique Flecken
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96649-1
id doaj-c0a4c6b352cd4c9196cc9ed64eb0e023
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0a4c6b352cd4c9196cc9ed64eb0e0232021-08-29T11:24:38ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-08-0111111410.1038/s41598-021-96649-1Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperceptionKsenija Slivac0Alexis Hervais-Adelman1Peter Hagoort2Monique Flecken3Max Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsDepartment of Psychology, University of ZürichMax Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsDepartment of Linguistics, University of AmsterdamAbstract Linguistic labels exert a particularly strong top-down influence on perception. The potency of this influence has been ascribed to their ability to evoke category-diagnostic features of concepts. In doing this, they facilitate the formation of a perceptual template concordant with those features, effectively biasing perceptual activation towards the labelled category. In this study, we employ a cueing paradigm with moving, point-light stimuli across three experiments, in order to examine how the number of biological motion features (form and kinematics) encoded in lexical cues modulates the efficacy of lexical top-down influence on perception. We find that the magnitude of lexical influence on biological motion perception rises as a function of the number of biological motion-relevant features carried by both cue and target. When lexical cues encode multiple biological motion features, this influence is robust enough to mislead participants into reporting erroneous percepts, even when a masking level yielding high performance is used.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96649-1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ksenija Slivac
Alexis Hervais-Adelman
Peter Hagoort
Monique Flecken
spellingShingle Ksenija Slivac
Alexis Hervais-Adelman
Peter Hagoort
Monique Flecken
Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception
Scientific Reports
author_facet Ksenija Slivac
Alexis Hervais-Adelman
Peter Hagoort
Monique Flecken
author_sort Ksenija Slivac
title Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception
title_short Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception
title_full Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception
title_fullStr Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception
title_full_unstemmed Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception
title_sort linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Linguistic labels exert a particularly strong top-down influence on perception. The potency of this influence has been ascribed to their ability to evoke category-diagnostic features of concepts. In doing this, they facilitate the formation of a perceptual template concordant with those features, effectively biasing perceptual activation towards the labelled category. In this study, we employ a cueing paradigm with moving, point-light stimuli across three experiments, in order to examine how the number of biological motion features (form and kinematics) encoded in lexical cues modulates the efficacy of lexical top-down influence on perception. We find that the magnitude of lexical influence on biological motion perception rises as a function of the number of biological motion-relevant features carried by both cue and target. When lexical cues encode multiple biological motion features, this influence is robust enough to mislead participants into reporting erroneous percepts, even when a masking level yielding high performance is used.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96649-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ksenijaslivac linguisticlabelscuebiologicalmotionperceptionandmisperception
AT alexishervaisadelman linguisticlabelscuebiologicalmotionperceptionandmisperception
AT peterhagoort linguisticlabelscuebiologicalmotionperceptionandmisperception
AT moniqueflecken linguisticlabelscuebiologicalmotionperceptionandmisperception
_version_ 1721186856732721152