Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception
Abstract Linguistic labels exert a particularly strong top-down influence on perception. The potency of this influence has been ascribed to their ability to evoke category-diagnostic features of concepts. In doing this, they facilitate the formation of a perceptual template concordant with those fea...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96649-1 |
id |
doaj-c0a4c6b352cd4c9196cc9ed64eb0e023 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0a4c6b352cd4c9196cc9ed64eb0e0232021-08-29T11:24:38ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-08-0111111410.1038/s41598-021-96649-1Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperceptionKsenija Slivac0Alexis Hervais-Adelman1Peter Hagoort2Monique Flecken3Max Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsDepartment of Psychology, University of ZürichMax Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsDepartment of Linguistics, University of AmsterdamAbstract Linguistic labels exert a particularly strong top-down influence on perception. The potency of this influence has been ascribed to their ability to evoke category-diagnostic features of concepts. In doing this, they facilitate the formation of a perceptual template concordant with those features, effectively biasing perceptual activation towards the labelled category. In this study, we employ a cueing paradigm with moving, point-light stimuli across three experiments, in order to examine how the number of biological motion features (form and kinematics) encoded in lexical cues modulates the efficacy of lexical top-down influence on perception. We find that the magnitude of lexical influence on biological motion perception rises as a function of the number of biological motion-relevant features carried by both cue and target. When lexical cues encode multiple biological motion features, this influence is robust enough to mislead participants into reporting erroneous percepts, even when a masking level yielding high performance is used.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96649-1 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ksenija Slivac Alexis Hervais-Adelman Peter Hagoort Monique Flecken |
spellingShingle |
Ksenija Slivac Alexis Hervais-Adelman Peter Hagoort Monique Flecken Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Ksenija Slivac Alexis Hervais-Adelman Peter Hagoort Monique Flecken |
author_sort |
Ksenija Slivac |
title |
Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception |
title_short |
Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception |
title_full |
Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception |
title_fullStr |
Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception |
title_full_unstemmed |
Linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception |
title_sort |
linguistic labels cue biological motion perception and misperception |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Linguistic labels exert a particularly strong top-down influence on perception. The potency of this influence has been ascribed to their ability to evoke category-diagnostic features of concepts. In doing this, they facilitate the formation of a perceptual template concordant with those features, effectively biasing perceptual activation towards the labelled category. In this study, we employ a cueing paradigm with moving, point-light stimuli across three experiments, in order to examine how the number of biological motion features (form and kinematics) encoded in lexical cues modulates the efficacy of lexical top-down influence on perception. We find that the magnitude of lexical influence on biological motion perception rises as a function of the number of biological motion-relevant features carried by both cue and target. When lexical cues encode multiple biological motion features, this influence is robust enough to mislead participants into reporting erroneous percepts, even when a masking level yielding high performance is used. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96649-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ksenijaslivac linguisticlabelscuebiologicalmotionperceptionandmisperception AT alexishervaisadelman linguisticlabelscuebiologicalmotionperceptionandmisperception AT peterhagoort linguisticlabelscuebiologicalmotionperceptionandmisperception AT moniqueflecken linguisticlabelscuebiologicalmotionperceptionandmisperception |
_version_ |
1721186856732721152 |