History and the Popular: Rewriting National Origins at the Argentine Bicentenary

<p>This article explores two texts that offer a self-conscious, metafictional rewriting of Argentina’s founding revolution in May 1810 at the time of the nation’s Bicentenary. It aims to draw out the political focus of both texts (a novel by Washington Cucurto and a play by Manuel Santos Iñurr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Catriona McAllister
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Liverpool University Press 2016-04-01
Series:Modern Languages Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.modernlanguagesopen.org/index.php/mlo/article/view/35
id doaj-c0a34f04f2d74297a4dcf48edb7be798
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0a34f04f2d74297a4dcf48edb7be7982020-11-25T01:26:59ZcatLiverpool University PressModern Languages Open2052-53972016-04-010010.3828/mlo.v0i0.3551History and the Popular: Rewriting National Origins at the Argentine BicentenaryCatriona McAllister0Cambridge University<p>This article explores two texts that offer a self-conscious, metafictional rewriting of Argentina’s founding revolution in May 1810 at the time of the nation’s Bicentenary. It aims to draw out the political focus of both texts (a novel by Washington Cucurto and a play by Manuel Santos Iñurrieta) by analysing the ways in which they draw on heavily politicized historical discourses in their fictional appropriations of this moment of origin. This analysis leads to the emergence of two very different ideas of the popular in both works, one closely related to Peronist discourse and the other entwined with the Marxist concept of the proletariat. This article therefore argues for the need to reconsider the definitions of the relationship between literature and history that emerge from postmodernist theory, definitions which centre on the epistemological relationship between ‘fiction’ and ‘fact’. Instead, it proposes a foregrounding of public discourses of history, often employed as political tools, in order to perceive a far more detailed engagement with the political in literary texts that rewrite history.</p><p><span>This article is published under a CC-BY license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</span></p>http://www.modernlanguagesopen.org/index.php/mlo/article/view/35historyliteraturepostmodernismArgentinaPeronismMarxismliberalismnational identitythe popular“official” history
collection DOAJ
language Catalan
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Catriona McAllister
spellingShingle Catriona McAllister
History and the Popular: Rewriting National Origins at the Argentine Bicentenary
Modern Languages Open
history
literature
postmodernism
Argentina
Peronism
Marxism
liberalism
national identity
the popular
“official” history
author_facet Catriona McAllister
author_sort Catriona McAllister
title History and the Popular: Rewriting National Origins at the Argentine Bicentenary
title_short History and the Popular: Rewriting National Origins at the Argentine Bicentenary
title_full History and the Popular: Rewriting National Origins at the Argentine Bicentenary
title_fullStr History and the Popular: Rewriting National Origins at the Argentine Bicentenary
title_full_unstemmed History and the Popular: Rewriting National Origins at the Argentine Bicentenary
title_sort history and the popular: rewriting national origins at the argentine bicentenary
publisher Liverpool University Press
series Modern Languages Open
issn 2052-5397
publishDate 2016-04-01
description <p>This article explores two texts that offer a self-conscious, metafictional rewriting of Argentina’s founding revolution in May 1810 at the time of the nation’s Bicentenary. It aims to draw out the political focus of both texts (a novel by Washington Cucurto and a play by Manuel Santos Iñurrieta) by analysing the ways in which they draw on heavily politicized historical discourses in their fictional appropriations of this moment of origin. This analysis leads to the emergence of two very different ideas of the popular in both works, one closely related to Peronist discourse and the other entwined with the Marxist concept of the proletariat. This article therefore argues for the need to reconsider the definitions of the relationship between literature and history that emerge from postmodernist theory, definitions which centre on the epistemological relationship between ‘fiction’ and ‘fact’. Instead, it proposes a foregrounding of public discourses of history, often employed as political tools, in order to perceive a far more detailed engagement with the political in literary texts that rewrite history.</p><p><span>This article is published under a CC-BY license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</span></p>
topic history
literature
postmodernism
Argentina
Peronism
Marxism
liberalism
national identity
the popular
“official” history
url http://www.modernlanguagesopen.org/index.php/mlo/article/view/35
work_keys_str_mv AT catrionamcallister historyandthepopularrewritingnationaloriginsattheargentinebicentenary
_version_ 1725107584704184320