Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study was to measure the biological characteristics involved in tumorigenesis and the progression of breast cancer in symptomatic and screen-detected carcinomas to identify possible differences.</p> <p>Met...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/604 |
id |
doaj-c09c25ee56054ce4bcb882009e655558 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c09c25ee56054ce4bcb882009e6555582020-11-25T00:13:10ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072012-12-0112160410.1186/1471-2407-12-604Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patientsRedondo MaximinoFunez RafaelMedina-Cano FranciscoRodrigo IsabelAcebal MercedesTellez TeresaRoldan M JoseHortas M LuisaBellinvia AnaPereda TeresaDomingo LaiaMorales-Suarez Varela MaríaSala MariaRueda Antonio<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study was to measure the biological characteristics involved in tumorigenesis and the progression of breast cancer in symptomatic and screen-detected carcinomas to identify possible differences.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>For this purpose, we evaluated clinical-pathological parameters and proliferative and apoptotic activities in a series of 130 symptomatic and 161 screen-detected tumors.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After adjustment for the smaller size of the screen-detected carcinomas compared with symptomatic cancers, those detected in the screening program presented longer disease-free survival (RR = 0.43, CI = 0.19-0.96) and had high estrogen and progesterone receptor concentrations more often than did symptomatic cancers (OR = 3.38, CI = 1.72-6.63 and OR = 3.44, CI = 1.94-6.10, respectively). Furthermore, the expression of bcl-2, a marker of good prognosis in breast cancer, was higher and HER2/neu expression was lower in screen-detected cancers than in symptomatic cancers (OR = 1.77, CI = 1.01-3.23 and OR = 0.64, CI = 0.40-0.98, respectively). However, when comparing prevalent <it>vs</it> incident screen-detected carcinomas, prevalent tumors were larger (OR = 2.84, CI = 1.05-7.69), were less likely to be HER2/neu positive (OR = 0.22, CI = 0.08-0.61) and presented lower Ki67 expression (OR = 0.36, CI = 0.17-0.77). In addition, incident tumors presented a shorter survival time than did prevalent ones (RR = 4.88, CI = 1.12-21.19).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Incident carcinomas include a variety of screen-detected carcinomas that exhibit differences in biology and prognosis relative to prevalent carcinomas. The detection method is important and should be taken into account when making therapy decisions.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/604Breast cancerDetection methodsProliferationApoptosisSurvival |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Redondo Maximino Funez Rafael Medina-Cano Francisco Rodrigo Isabel Acebal Mercedes Tellez Teresa Roldan M Jose Hortas M Luisa Bellinvia Ana Pereda Teresa Domingo Laia Morales-Suarez Varela María Sala Maria Rueda Antonio |
spellingShingle |
Redondo Maximino Funez Rafael Medina-Cano Francisco Rodrigo Isabel Acebal Mercedes Tellez Teresa Roldan M Jose Hortas M Luisa Bellinvia Ana Pereda Teresa Domingo Laia Morales-Suarez Varela María Sala Maria Rueda Antonio Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients BMC Cancer Breast cancer Detection methods Proliferation Apoptosis Survival |
author_facet |
Redondo Maximino Funez Rafael Medina-Cano Francisco Rodrigo Isabel Acebal Mercedes Tellez Teresa Roldan M Jose Hortas M Luisa Bellinvia Ana Pereda Teresa Domingo Laia Morales-Suarez Varela María Sala Maria Rueda Antonio |
author_sort |
Redondo Maximino |
title |
Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients |
title_short |
Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients |
title_full |
Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients |
title_fullStr |
Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients |
title_sort |
detection methods predict differences in biology and survival in breast cancer patients |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cancer |
issn |
1471-2407 |
publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study was to measure the biological characteristics involved in tumorigenesis and the progression of breast cancer in symptomatic and screen-detected carcinomas to identify possible differences.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>For this purpose, we evaluated clinical-pathological parameters and proliferative and apoptotic activities in a series of 130 symptomatic and 161 screen-detected tumors.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After adjustment for the smaller size of the screen-detected carcinomas compared with symptomatic cancers, those detected in the screening program presented longer disease-free survival (RR = 0.43, CI = 0.19-0.96) and had high estrogen and progesterone receptor concentrations more often than did symptomatic cancers (OR = 3.38, CI = 1.72-6.63 and OR = 3.44, CI = 1.94-6.10, respectively). Furthermore, the expression of bcl-2, a marker of good prognosis in breast cancer, was higher and HER2/neu expression was lower in screen-detected cancers than in symptomatic cancers (OR = 1.77, CI = 1.01-3.23 and OR = 0.64, CI = 0.40-0.98, respectively). However, when comparing prevalent <it>vs</it> incident screen-detected carcinomas, prevalent tumors were larger (OR = 2.84, CI = 1.05-7.69), were less likely to be HER2/neu positive (OR = 0.22, CI = 0.08-0.61) and presented lower Ki67 expression (OR = 0.36, CI = 0.17-0.77). In addition, incident tumors presented a shorter survival time than did prevalent ones (RR = 4.88, CI = 1.12-21.19).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Incident carcinomas include a variety of screen-detected carcinomas that exhibit differences in biology and prognosis relative to prevalent carcinomas. The detection method is important and should be taken into account when making therapy decisions.</p> |
topic |
Breast cancer Detection methods Proliferation Apoptosis Survival |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/604 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT redondomaximino detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT funezrafael detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT medinacanofrancisco detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT rodrigoisabel detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT acebalmercedes detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT tellezteresa detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT roldanmjose detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT hortasmluisa detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT bellinviaana detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT peredateresa detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT domingolaia detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT moralessuarezvarelamaria detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT salamaria detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients AT ruedaantonio detectionmethodspredictdifferencesinbiologyandsurvivalinbreastcancerpatients |
_version_ |
1725396062754045952 |