Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground

<p>Recently, there has been growing interest in the possibility of using neural networks for both weather forecasting and the generation of climate datasets. We use a bottom–up approach for assessing whether it should, in principle, be possible to do this. We use the relatively simple general...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Scher, G. Messori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-07-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2797/2019/gmd-12-2797-2019.pdf
id doaj-c092b91d3b874cefb243258fa91b2353
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c092b91d3b874cefb243258fa91b23532020-11-25T02:03:36ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032019-07-01122797280910.5194/gmd-12-2797-2019Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study groundS. Scher0G. Messori1G. Messori2Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden<p>Recently, there has been growing interest in the possibility of using neural networks for both weather forecasting and the generation of climate datasets. We use a bottom–up approach for assessing whether it should, in principle, be possible to do this. We use the relatively simple general circulation models (GCMs) PUMA and PLASIM as a simplified reality on which we train deep neural networks, which we then use for predicting the model weather at lead times of a few days. We specifically assess how the complexity of the climate model affects the neural network's forecast skill and how dependent the skill is on the length of the provided training period. Additionally, we show that using the neural networks to reproduce the climate of general circulation models including a seasonal cycle remains challenging – in contrast to earlier promising results on a model without seasonal cycle.</p>https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2797/2019/gmd-12-2797-2019.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Scher
G. Messori
G. Messori
spellingShingle S. Scher
G. Messori
G. Messori
Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground
Geoscientific Model Development
author_facet S. Scher
G. Messori
G. Messori
author_sort S. Scher
title Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground
title_short Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground
title_full Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground
title_fullStr Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground
title_full_unstemmed Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground
title_sort weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (gcms) with different complexity as a study ground
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geoscientific Model Development
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
publishDate 2019-07-01
description <p>Recently, there has been growing interest in the possibility of using neural networks for both weather forecasting and the generation of climate datasets. We use a bottom–up approach for assessing whether it should, in principle, be possible to do this. We use the relatively simple general circulation models (GCMs) PUMA and PLASIM as a simplified reality on which we train deep neural networks, which we then use for predicting the model weather at lead times of a few days. We specifically assess how the complexity of the climate model affects the neural network's forecast skill and how dependent the skill is on the length of the provided training period. Additionally, we show that using the neural networks to reproduce the climate of general circulation models including a seasonal cycle remains challenging – in contrast to earlier promising results on a model without seasonal cycle.</p>
url https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2797/2019/gmd-12-2797-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sscher weatherandclimateforecastingwithneuralnetworksusinggeneralcirculationmodelsgcmswithdifferentcomplexityasastudyground
AT gmessori weatherandclimateforecastingwithneuralnetworksusinggeneralcirculationmodelsgcmswithdifferentcomplexityasastudyground
AT gmessori weatherandclimateforecastingwithneuralnetworksusinggeneralcirculationmodelsgcmswithdifferentcomplexityasastudyground
_version_ 1724947107764240384