Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground
<p>Recently, there has been growing interest in the possibility of using neural networks for both weather forecasting and the generation of climate datasets. We use a bottom–up approach for assessing whether it should, in principle, be possible to do this. We use the relatively simple general...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Geoscientific Model Development |
Online Access: | https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2797/2019/gmd-12-2797-2019.pdf |
id |
doaj-c092b91d3b874cefb243258fa91b2353 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c092b91d3b874cefb243258fa91b23532020-11-25T02:03:36ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032019-07-01122797280910.5194/gmd-12-2797-2019Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study groundS. Scher0G. Messori1G. Messori2Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden<p>Recently, there has been growing interest in the possibility of using neural networks for both weather forecasting and the generation of climate datasets. We use a bottom–up approach for assessing whether it should, in principle, be possible to do this. We use the relatively simple general circulation models (GCMs) PUMA and PLASIM as a simplified reality on which we train deep neural networks, which we then use for predicting the model weather at lead times of a few days. We specifically assess how the complexity of the climate model affects the neural network's forecast skill and how dependent the skill is on the length of the provided training period. Additionally, we show that using the neural networks to reproduce the climate of general circulation models including a seasonal cycle remains challenging – in contrast to earlier promising results on a model without seasonal cycle.</p>https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2797/2019/gmd-12-2797-2019.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S. Scher G. Messori G. Messori |
spellingShingle |
S. Scher G. Messori G. Messori Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground Geoscientific Model Development |
author_facet |
S. Scher G. Messori G. Messori |
author_sort |
S. Scher |
title |
Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground |
title_short |
Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground |
title_full |
Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground |
title_fullStr |
Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground |
title_full_unstemmed |
Weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (GCMs) with different complexity as a study ground |
title_sort |
weather and climate forecasting with neural networks: using general circulation models (gcms) with different complexity as a study ground |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geoscientific Model Development |
issn |
1991-959X 1991-9603 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
<p>Recently, there has been growing interest in the possibility of using neural networks for both weather forecasting
and the generation of climate datasets. We use a bottom–up approach
for assessing whether it should, in principle, be possible to do this. We use the relatively simple general circulation models (GCMs) PUMA and PLASIM as a simplified reality on which we train deep neural networks, which we then use for predicting the model weather at lead times of a few days. We specifically assess how the complexity of the climate model affects the neural network's forecast skill and how dependent the skill is on the length of the provided training period. Additionally, we show that using the neural networks to reproduce the climate of general circulation models including a seasonal cycle remains challenging – in contrast to earlier promising results on a model without seasonal cycle.</p> |
url |
https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2797/2019/gmd-12-2797-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sscher weatherandclimateforecastingwithneuralnetworksusinggeneralcirculationmodelsgcmswithdifferentcomplexityasastudyground AT gmessori weatherandclimateforecastingwithneuralnetworksusinggeneralcirculationmodelsgcmswithdifferentcomplexityasastudyground AT gmessori weatherandclimateforecastingwithneuralnetworksusinggeneralcirculationmodelsgcmswithdifferentcomplexityasastudyground |
_version_ |
1724947107764240384 |