Van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. Meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de Republiek, 1579-1795

From religious liberty to human right. The development of public opinion on censorship and press freedom in the Dutch Republic, 1579-1795, Joris van Eijnatten Most studies on censorship and freedom of the press in the early modern (northern) Netherlands focus on legislation concerning, and the actua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. van Eijnatten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2003-01-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4205
id doaj-c08f00c6e0f14a5da86ce09d4bad1374
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c08f00c6e0f14a5da86ce09d4bad13742021-10-02T17:33:51ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982003-01-011181Van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. Meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de Republiek, 1579-1795J. van EijnattenFrom religious liberty to human right. The development of public opinion on censorship and press freedom in the Dutch Republic, 1579-1795, Joris van Eijnatten Most studies on censorship and freedom of the press in the early modern (northern) Netherlands focus on legislation concerning, and the actual practice of, governmental and ecclesiastical censorship. By contrast, ideas on, and theories of, press freedom and censorship have all but been neglected. This may be due to the fact that the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century pamphlet literature does not live up to the expectations of historians expecting to find principled defences of press freedom. Yet censorship (or the lack of it) was never based exclusively on practical considerations. There have always been supporters of (a certain measure of) press freedom. Which arguments did they employ in the public domain? This paper discusses the variety of arguments adduced by authors ranging from Dirk Volckertsz Coornhert to Adriaan Kluit, thus offering, in the process, an overview of the gradual development of public opinion on censorship and press freedom in the Dutch Republic between 1579 and 1795. A typology of the various arguments used by early modern writers is introduced, and it is suggested that this classification may be used for further comparative research into theories of press freedom in western Europe and the Americas between 1550 and 1800. https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4205Legal historypolitical culture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. van Eijnatten
spellingShingle J. van Eijnatten
Van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. Meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de Republiek, 1579-1795
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Legal history
political culture
author_facet J. van Eijnatten
author_sort J. van Eijnatten
title Van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. Meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de Republiek, 1579-1795
title_short Van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. Meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de Republiek, 1579-1795
title_full Van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. Meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de Republiek, 1579-1795
title_fullStr Van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. Meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de Republiek, 1579-1795
title_full_unstemmed Van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. Meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de Republiek, 1579-1795
title_sort van godsdienstvrijheid naar mensenrecht. meningsvorming over censuur en persvrijheid in de republiek, 1579-1795
publisher Open Journals
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
publishDate 2003-01-01
description From religious liberty to human right. The development of public opinion on censorship and press freedom in the Dutch Republic, 1579-1795, Joris van Eijnatten Most studies on censorship and freedom of the press in the early modern (northern) Netherlands focus on legislation concerning, and the actual practice of, governmental and ecclesiastical censorship. By contrast, ideas on, and theories of, press freedom and censorship have all but been neglected. This may be due to the fact that the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century pamphlet literature does not live up to the expectations of historians expecting to find principled defences of press freedom. Yet censorship (or the lack of it) was never based exclusively on practical considerations. There have always been supporters of (a certain measure of) press freedom. Which arguments did they employ in the public domain? This paper discusses the variety of arguments adduced by authors ranging from Dirk Volckertsz Coornhert to Adriaan Kluit, thus offering, in the process, an overview of the gradual development of public opinion on censorship and press freedom in the Dutch Republic between 1579 and 1795. A typology of the various arguments used by early modern writers is introduced, and it is suggested that this classification may be used for further comparative research into theories of press freedom in western Europe and the Americas between 1550 and 1800.
topic Legal history
political culture
url https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4205
work_keys_str_mv AT jvaneijnatten vangodsdienstvrijheidnaarmensenrechtmeningsvormingovercensuurenpersvrijheidinderepubliek15791795
_version_ 1716851042930393088