Long-term results of Progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral hernia

BACKGROUND: An issue that has become apparent in using Progrip in ventral hernias is the restriction in the available sizes. The area of dissection for mesh placement can be variable. This report is based on a subgroup analysis of the cases in which a combination of Progrip meshes was used. MATERIAL...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hazim A Eltyeb, Frederick Dowker, Duncan Light
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2021;volume=4;issue=1;spage=20;epage=22;aulast=Eltyeb
id doaj-c0784021f97f4038bb4fdaab606389d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0784021f97f4038bb4fdaab606389d82021-03-31T06:52:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsInternational Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery2589-87362589-80782021-01-0141202210.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_42_20Long-term results of Progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral herniaHazim A EltyebFrederick DowkerDuncan LightBACKGROUND: An issue that has become apparent in using Progrip in ventral hernias is the restriction in the available sizes. The area of dissection for mesh placement can be variable. This report is based on a subgroup analysis of the cases in which a combination of Progrip meshes was used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of our prospective database. Cases were identified of Progrip mesh used in ventral hernia repair from 2016 to 2020. Subgroup analysis was performed of cases which Progrip meshes were combined. Telephone follow-up was done in September 2020. RESULTS: Sixty-eight cases were identified. The mean age of patients was 63.13 (26–87). Thirty-three were female. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists grade was 2 (range: 1–4). The procedure time was 164.35 min (45–490). The mean defect size was 7.23 (2–25 cm). The mean mesh size was a 20 cm × 15 cm mesh. Follow-up was achieved in 63/68 cases. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years. Recurrence was found in 4 (6%). Nine had ongoing abdominal pain. Fifty-nine (93.65%) returned to normal activity. Three returned to theater for wound dehiscence and seromas. Twelve cases required 2 meshes to be combined. All cases involved a mesh size of 30 cm × 30 cm. The mean age was 64 (44–78 years). Six were male. The mean defect size was 9 cm. The operative time was 235 min (120–320). The mean postoperative stay was 5 days (4–60). Three cases required component separation (2 anterior component separation and 1 posterior component separation). There were no recurrences or further surgery. One had ongoing pain. Nine cases had full return to activity. CONCLUSION: Combining Progrip meshes in ventral hernia is an acceptable practice. Mesh may be sutured together or overlapped with equivalent results. Extending the product range to a 30 cm × 30 cm mesh would obviate the need for mesh overlap in our practice.http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2021;volume=4;issue=1;spage=20;epage=22;aulast=Eltyebincisional herniaprogrip meshventral hernia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hazim A Eltyeb
Frederick Dowker
Duncan Light
spellingShingle Hazim A Eltyeb
Frederick Dowker
Duncan Light
Long-term results of Progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral hernia
International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
incisional hernia
progrip mesh
ventral hernia
author_facet Hazim A Eltyeb
Frederick Dowker
Duncan Light
author_sort Hazim A Eltyeb
title Long-term results of Progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral hernia
title_short Long-term results of Progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral hernia
title_full Long-term results of Progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral hernia
title_fullStr Long-term results of Progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral hernia
title_full_unstemmed Long-term results of Progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral hernia
title_sort long-term results of progrip mesh for retromuscular repair of ventral hernia
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
issn 2589-8736
2589-8078
publishDate 2021-01-01
description BACKGROUND: An issue that has become apparent in using Progrip in ventral hernias is the restriction in the available sizes. The area of dissection for mesh placement can be variable. This report is based on a subgroup analysis of the cases in which a combination of Progrip meshes was used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of our prospective database. Cases were identified of Progrip mesh used in ventral hernia repair from 2016 to 2020. Subgroup analysis was performed of cases which Progrip meshes were combined. Telephone follow-up was done in September 2020. RESULTS: Sixty-eight cases were identified. The mean age of patients was 63.13 (26–87). Thirty-three were female. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists grade was 2 (range: 1–4). The procedure time was 164.35 min (45–490). The mean defect size was 7.23 (2–25 cm). The mean mesh size was a 20 cm × 15 cm mesh. Follow-up was achieved in 63/68 cases. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years. Recurrence was found in 4 (6%). Nine had ongoing abdominal pain. Fifty-nine (93.65%) returned to normal activity. Three returned to theater for wound dehiscence and seromas. Twelve cases required 2 meshes to be combined. All cases involved a mesh size of 30 cm × 30 cm. The mean age was 64 (44–78 years). Six were male. The mean defect size was 9 cm. The operative time was 235 min (120–320). The mean postoperative stay was 5 days (4–60). Three cases required component separation (2 anterior component separation and 1 posterior component separation). There were no recurrences or further surgery. One had ongoing pain. Nine cases had full return to activity. CONCLUSION: Combining Progrip meshes in ventral hernia is an acceptable practice. Mesh may be sutured together or overlapped with equivalent results. Extending the product range to a 30 cm × 30 cm mesh would obviate the need for mesh overlap in our practice.
topic incisional hernia
progrip mesh
ventral hernia
url http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2021;volume=4;issue=1;spage=20;epage=22;aulast=Eltyeb
work_keys_str_mv AT hazimaeltyeb longtermresultsofprogripmeshforretromuscularrepairofventralhernia
AT frederickdowker longtermresultsofprogripmeshforretromuscularrepairofventralhernia
AT duncanlight longtermresultsofprogripmeshforretromuscularrepairofventralhernia
_version_ 1724178185106489344