Transitive Unergatives in Pazar Laz

The aim of this study is to show that all unergatives in Pazar Laz involve an overtly filled object position and behave simply on a par with regular transitives, as the availability of an initiator is strictly dependent on the availability of an undergoer argument in line with the Neo-Burzio Depende...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Balkiz Öztürk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2021-02-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/828
id doaj-c06a72b6e702475ba3538af59b6f71ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c06a72b6e702475ba3538af59b6f71ea2021-09-02T17:56:45ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352021-02-016110.5334/gjgl.828606Transitive Unergatives in Pazar LazBalkiz Öztürk0Boğğziçi UniversityThe aim of this study is to show that all unergatives in Pazar Laz involve an overtly filled object position and behave simply on a par with regular transitives, as the availability of an initiator is strictly dependent on the availability of an undergoer argument in line with the Neo-Burzio Dependency proposed for Georgian by Nash (2018). We will show that differently from Georgian, in Pazar Laz the availability of an initator and that of an undergoer actually exhibit a mutual dependency for all eventive verbal predicates, which extends the transitive pattern also to unaccusatives. As the language requires a strict co-dependency between the undergoer and the initiator, all eventive verbal predicates project both an initiator and an undergoer position. Consequently, the language does not syntactically differentiate between unergatives and unaccusatives and lacks the true unaccusative patterns, where no initiator is available syntactically. We will further argue that the co-dependency requirement for initiators and undergoers is in line with Ritter & Rosen (2000)’s typology, where languages are classified as Initiation languages or Delimitation languages based on whether they define an event in terms of its initial bound or its terminal bound. As a very conservative Initiation-language, Pazar Laz has to syntactically express the initiator in all types of eventive predicates, which itself is dependent on the availability of an undergoer argument in line with the Neo-Burzio Dependency.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/828verbs of emissionagentive unergativesactive impersonal constructionsunaccusatives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Balkiz Öztürk
spellingShingle Balkiz Öztürk
Transitive Unergatives in Pazar Laz
Glossa
verbs of emission
agentive unergatives
active impersonal constructions
unaccusatives
author_facet Balkiz Öztürk
author_sort Balkiz Öztürk
title Transitive Unergatives in Pazar Laz
title_short Transitive Unergatives in Pazar Laz
title_full Transitive Unergatives in Pazar Laz
title_fullStr Transitive Unergatives in Pazar Laz
title_full_unstemmed Transitive Unergatives in Pazar Laz
title_sort transitive unergatives in pazar laz
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2021-02-01
description The aim of this study is to show that all unergatives in Pazar Laz involve an overtly filled object position and behave simply on a par with regular transitives, as the availability of an initiator is strictly dependent on the availability of an undergoer argument in line with the Neo-Burzio Dependency proposed for Georgian by Nash (2018). We will show that differently from Georgian, in Pazar Laz the availability of an initator and that of an undergoer actually exhibit a mutual dependency for all eventive verbal predicates, which extends the transitive pattern also to unaccusatives. As the language requires a strict co-dependency between the undergoer and the initiator, all eventive verbal predicates project both an initiator and an undergoer position. Consequently, the language does not syntactically differentiate between unergatives and unaccusatives and lacks the true unaccusative patterns, where no initiator is available syntactically. We will further argue that the co-dependency requirement for initiators and undergoers is in line with Ritter & Rosen (2000)’s typology, where languages are classified as Initiation languages or Delimitation languages based on whether they define an event in terms of its initial bound or its terminal bound. As a very conservative Initiation-language, Pazar Laz has to syntactically express the initiator in all types of eventive predicates, which itself is dependent on the availability of an undergoer argument in line with the Neo-Burzio Dependency.
topic verbs of emission
agentive unergatives
active impersonal constructions
unaccusatives
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/828
work_keys_str_mv AT balkizozturk transitiveunergativesinpazarlaz
_version_ 1721171785935749120