The case for a smoker's license.

BACKGROUND TO THE DEBATE:Tobacco continues to kill millions of people around the world each year and its use is increasing in some countries, which makes the need for new, creative, and radical efforts to achieve the tobacco control endgame vitally important. One such effort is discussed in this PLO...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simon Chapman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3496663?pdf=render
id doaj-c055232045104643bd71e1e349df3b5a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c055232045104643bd71e1e349df3b5a2020-11-25T02:10:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762012-01-01911e100134210.1371/journal.pmed.1001342The case for a smoker's license.Simon ChapmanBACKGROUND TO THE DEBATE:Tobacco continues to kill millions of people around the world each year and its use is increasing in some countries, which makes the need for new, creative, and radical efforts to achieve the tobacco control endgame vitally important. One such effort is discussed in this PLOS Medicine Debate, where Simon Chapman presents his proposal for a "smoker's license" and Jeff Collin argues against. Chapman sets out a case for introducing a smart card license for smokers designed to limit access to tobacco products and encourage cessation. Key elements of the smoker's license include smokers setting daily limits, financial incentives for permanent license surrender, and a test of health risk knowledge for commencing smokers. Collin argues against the proposal, saying that it would shift focus away from the real vector of the epidemic--the tobacco industry--and that by focusing on individuals it would censure victims, increase stigmatization of smokers, and marginalize the poor.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3496663?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simon Chapman
spellingShingle Simon Chapman
The case for a smoker's license.
PLoS Medicine
author_facet Simon Chapman
author_sort Simon Chapman
title The case for a smoker's license.
title_short The case for a smoker's license.
title_full The case for a smoker's license.
title_fullStr The case for a smoker's license.
title_full_unstemmed The case for a smoker's license.
title_sort case for a smoker's license.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Medicine
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
publishDate 2012-01-01
description BACKGROUND TO THE DEBATE:Tobacco continues to kill millions of people around the world each year and its use is increasing in some countries, which makes the need for new, creative, and radical efforts to achieve the tobacco control endgame vitally important. One such effort is discussed in this PLOS Medicine Debate, where Simon Chapman presents his proposal for a "smoker's license" and Jeff Collin argues against. Chapman sets out a case for introducing a smart card license for smokers designed to limit access to tobacco products and encourage cessation. Key elements of the smoker's license include smokers setting daily limits, financial incentives for permanent license surrender, and a test of health risk knowledge for commencing smokers. Collin argues against the proposal, saying that it would shift focus away from the real vector of the epidemic--the tobacco industry--and that by focusing on individuals it would censure victims, increase stigmatization of smokers, and marginalize the poor.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3496663?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT simonchapman thecaseforasmokerslicense
AT simonchapman caseforasmokerslicense
_version_ 1724917396416757760