Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture
In this paper, we explore the effect that the increasingly powerful discourse of sustainability is having on the field of architecture. The term “field” derives from Bourdieu’s conceptualization of fields as dynamic spaces of social relations tending towards transformation or conservation. While the...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Arts |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/4/2/34 |
id |
doaj-c04e00f5cebc4b14a3cd8e83a245ad4d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c04e00f5cebc4b14a3cd8e83a245ad4d2020-11-24T22:54:33ZengMDPI AGArts2076-07522015-04-0142344810.3390/arts4020034arts4020034Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable ArchitectureCeridwen Owen0Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks1School of Architecture and Design, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1-323 Launceston Tasmania 7250, AustraliaSchool of Architecture and Design, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1-323 Launceston Tasmania 7250, AustraliaIn this paper, we explore the effect that the increasingly powerful discourse of sustainability is having on the field of architecture. The term “field” derives from Bourdieu’s conceptualization of fields as dynamic spaces of social relations tending towards transformation or conservation. While the overlapping fields of sustainability and architecture have historically been characterized by resistance, shifts in environmental discourse towards complexity and systems thinking and the inclusion of cultural, social, political and economic concerns within the broader mandate of sustainability signal a more synergistic ideological terrain. We use methods of narrative analysis to explore these shifts through the localized discourse of the award for sustainable architecture within the Australian context and offer a brief comparative analysis of the sustainable architecture awards discourse in Britain and North America. As arguably the most public elucidations of the profession’s ideology, architecture awards are a productive place in which to explore constructions of “sustainable architecture”. The narrative analysis reveals a trajectory towards assimilation supported by the positioning of sustainability as fundamentally a social, as well as an environmental practice. Contentions surrounding the ultimate disappearance of the award, however, reveal a more perverse relationship between sustainability and architecture.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/4/2/34sustainabilityarchitectureawardsBourdieudiscourse |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ceridwen Owen Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks |
spellingShingle |
Ceridwen Owen Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture Arts sustainability architecture awards Bourdieu discourse |
author_facet |
Ceridwen Owen Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks |
author_sort |
Ceridwen Owen |
title |
Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture |
title_short |
Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture |
title_full |
Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture |
title_fullStr |
Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture |
title_sort |
framing the field: the award for sustainable architecture |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Arts |
issn |
2076-0752 |
publishDate |
2015-04-01 |
description |
In this paper, we explore the effect that the increasingly powerful discourse of sustainability is having on the field of architecture. The term “field” derives from Bourdieu’s conceptualization of fields as dynamic spaces of social relations tending towards transformation or conservation. While the overlapping fields of sustainability and architecture have historically been characterized by resistance, shifts in environmental discourse towards complexity and systems thinking and the inclusion of cultural, social, political and economic concerns within the broader mandate of sustainability signal a more synergistic ideological terrain. We use methods of narrative analysis to explore these shifts through the localized discourse of the award for sustainable architecture within the Australian context and offer a brief comparative analysis of the sustainable architecture awards discourse in Britain and North America. As arguably the most public elucidations of the profession’s ideology, architecture awards are a productive place in which to explore constructions of “sustainable architecture”. The narrative analysis reveals a trajectory towards assimilation supported by the positioning of sustainability as fundamentally a social, as well as an environmental practice. Contentions surrounding the ultimate disappearance of the award, however, reveal a more perverse relationship between sustainability and architecture. |
topic |
sustainability architecture awards Bourdieu discourse |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/4/2/34 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ceridwenowen framingthefieldtheawardforsustainablearchitecture AT jenniferlorrimarshanks framingthefieldtheawardforsustainablearchitecture |
_version_ |
1725659157568159744 |