Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture

In this paper, we explore the effect that the increasingly powerful discourse of sustainability is having on the field of architecture. The term “field” derives from Bourdieu’s conceptualization of fields as dynamic spaces of social relations tending towards transformation or conservation. While the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ceridwen Owen, Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-04-01
Series:Arts
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/4/2/34
id doaj-c04e00f5cebc4b14a3cd8e83a245ad4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c04e00f5cebc4b14a3cd8e83a245ad4d2020-11-24T22:54:33ZengMDPI AGArts2076-07522015-04-0142344810.3390/arts4020034arts4020034Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable ArchitectureCeridwen Owen0Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks1School of Architecture and Design, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1-323 Launceston Tasmania 7250, AustraliaSchool of Architecture and Design, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1-323 Launceston Tasmania 7250, AustraliaIn this paper, we explore the effect that the increasingly powerful discourse of sustainability is having on the field of architecture. The term “field” derives from Bourdieu’s conceptualization of fields as dynamic spaces of social relations tending towards transformation or conservation. While the overlapping fields of sustainability and architecture have historically been characterized by resistance, shifts in environmental discourse towards complexity and systems thinking and the inclusion of cultural, social, political and economic concerns within the broader mandate of sustainability signal a more synergistic ideological terrain. We use methods of narrative analysis to explore these shifts through the localized discourse of the award for sustainable architecture within the Australian context and offer a brief comparative analysis of the sustainable architecture awards discourse in Britain and North America. As arguably the most public elucidations of the profession’s ideology, architecture awards are a productive place in which to explore constructions of “sustainable architecture”. The narrative analysis reveals a trajectory towards assimilation supported by the positioning of sustainability as fundamentally a social, as well as an environmental practice. Contentions surrounding the ultimate disappearance of the award, however, reveal a more perverse relationship between sustainability and architecture.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/4/2/34sustainabilityarchitectureawardsBourdieudiscourse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ceridwen Owen
Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks
spellingShingle Ceridwen Owen
Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks
Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture
Arts
sustainability
architecture
awards
Bourdieu
discourse
author_facet Ceridwen Owen
Jennifer Lorrimar-Shanks
author_sort Ceridwen Owen
title Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture
title_short Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture
title_full Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture
title_fullStr Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture
title_full_unstemmed Framing the Field: The Award for Sustainable Architecture
title_sort framing the field: the award for sustainable architecture
publisher MDPI AG
series Arts
issn 2076-0752
publishDate 2015-04-01
description In this paper, we explore the effect that the increasingly powerful discourse of sustainability is having on the field of architecture. The term “field” derives from Bourdieu’s conceptualization of fields as dynamic spaces of social relations tending towards transformation or conservation. While the overlapping fields of sustainability and architecture have historically been characterized by resistance, shifts in environmental discourse towards complexity and systems thinking and the inclusion of cultural, social, political and economic concerns within the broader mandate of sustainability signal a more synergistic ideological terrain. We use methods of narrative analysis to explore these shifts through the localized discourse of the award for sustainable architecture within the Australian context and offer a brief comparative analysis of the sustainable architecture awards discourse in Britain and North America. As arguably the most public elucidations of the profession’s ideology, architecture awards are a productive place in which to explore constructions of “sustainable architecture”. The narrative analysis reveals a trajectory towards assimilation supported by the positioning of sustainability as fundamentally a social, as well as an environmental practice. Contentions surrounding the ultimate disappearance of the award, however, reveal a more perverse relationship between sustainability and architecture.
topic sustainability
architecture
awards
Bourdieu
discourse
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/4/2/34
work_keys_str_mv AT ceridwenowen framingthefieldtheawardforsustainablearchitecture
AT jenniferlorrimarshanks framingthefieldtheawardforsustainablearchitecture
_version_ 1725659157568159744