The Students’ Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison Among Faculties

The paper reports research employing a quantitative approach to investigating the competences of university students about educating for sustainable development (ESD). Participants were 467 bachelor students of the following five areas: social sciences, educational sciences, applied sciences, engine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Biasutti Michele, Surian Alessio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2012-01-01
Series:Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/v10230-012-0005-y
id doaj-c0424c680b2e4fa68778565949c7ccd4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0424c680b2e4fa68778565949c7ccd42021-09-05T21:25:14ZengSciendoDiscourse and Communication for Sustainable Education2255-75472012-01-0132012758210.2478/v10230-012-0005-yThe Students’ Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison Among FacultiesBiasutti Michele0Surian Alessio1University of Padova, ItalyUniversity of Padova, ItalyThe paper reports research employing a quantitative approach to investigating the competences of university students about educating for sustainable development (ESD). Participants were 467 bachelor students of the following five areas: social sciences, educational sciences, applied sciences, engineering and health sciences. The Student Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies was employed. Internal consistency and factor structure of this questionnaire were investigated by assessing Cronbach’s alphas and by performing exploratory factor analysis. Data were subjected to ANOVA for comparing the students of the five faculties. The relevance of factors and the differences between students of different areas were discussed considering also how to infuse ESD principles in university curricula. The aim is reorienting university study programmes in various faculties to prepare students about sustainable development issues.https://doi.org/10.2478/v10230-012-0005-yhigher educationstudent competencieseducation for sustainable development surveyquantitative approachreorienting university programmes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Biasutti Michele
Surian Alessio
spellingShingle Biasutti Michele
Surian Alessio
The Students’ Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison Among Faculties
Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education
higher education
student competencies
education for sustainable development survey
quantitative approach
reorienting university programmes
author_facet Biasutti Michele
Surian Alessio
author_sort Biasutti Michele
title The Students’ Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison Among Faculties
title_short The Students’ Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison Among Faculties
title_full The Students’ Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison Among Faculties
title_fullStr The Students’ Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison Among Faculties
title_full_unstemmed The Students’ Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies: A Comparison Among Faculties
title_sort students’ survey of education for sustainable development competencies: a comparison among faculties
publisher Sciendo
series Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education
issn 2255-7547
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The paper reports research employing a quantitative approach to investigating the competences of university students about educating for sustainable development (ESD). Participants were 467 bachelor students of the following five areas: social sciences, educational sciences, applied sciences, engineering and health sciences. The Student Survey of Education for Sustainable Development Competencies was employed. Internal consistency and factor structure of this questionnaire were investigated by assessing Cronbach’s alphas and by performing exploratory factor analysis. Data were subjected to ANOVA for comparing the students of the five faculties. The relevance of factors and the differences between students of different areas were discussed considering also how to infuse ESD principles in university curricula. The aim is reorienting university study programmes in various faculties to prepare students about sustainable development issues.
topic higher education
student competencies
education for sustainable development survey
quantitative approach
reorienting university programmes
url https://doi.org/10.2478/v10230-012-0005-y
work_keys_str_mv AT biasuttimichele thestudentssurveyofeducationforsustainabledevelopmentcompetenciesacomparisonamongfaculties
AT surianalessio thestudentssurveyofeducationforsustainabledevelopmentcompetenciesacomparisonamongfaculties
AT biasuttimichele studentssurveyofeducationforsustainabledevelopmentcompetenciesacomparisonamongfaculties
AT surianalessio studentssurveyofeducationforsustainabledevelopmentcompetenciesacomparisonamongfaculties
_version_ 1717780492047089664