Between Hermeneutics and Aesthetics: Reconsidering Truth and Method as an “Aesthetics of Truth”

• Main Author: Patrick Martin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Centre for Philosophical Research 2018-09-01
• Series: Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
• Subjects: aesthetic non-differentiation; aesthetics; art; Bubner; experience; Gadamer; hermeneutics
• Online Access: http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/P_Martin-Between_Hermeneutics_and_Aesthetics.pdf

The focus of the paper is on Gadamer’s claim that “Aesthetics has to be absorbed into hermeneutics.” Our initial aim is to contextualize the statement, emphasizing its controversial nature, given that the context specific meaning of the claim can seem commonsensical. Accordingly, the first part of the paper is devoted to developing the historical tension between philosophy and art. Towards the latter half of the paper, the task is to examine Gadamer’s thesis in light of this history. Evaluating Gadamer’s position within the philosophical tradition, we will take recourse to Bubner’s critique of an “aesthetics of truth.” While judging Bubner’s critique to be accurate, we will also stress certain peculiarities that potentially undermine his critique—especially as it concerns Gadamer. Here, the most critical aspect has to do with his critique of the notion of “the work,” which figures as the cornerstone of his critique of modern-day aesthetic theory. We will show that insofar as Bubner argues from a critique of the work anchored in modern art, then, as far as Gadamer is concerned, he is arguing from a notion of the work that was never theoretically espoused to begin with. We will conclude with an argument for the claim that the artwork on Gadamer’s account is hermeneutically structured. For only on such a conception, we argue, can he be taken as living up to his promise of doing justice to the experience of art.