REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY?

The author divides the European countries into two groups, according to the efficiency of their respective legal-procedural system. First, that of the States whose relative system is inefficient, which he calls "Mediterranean" because most of those countries are situated on the shores of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Alan Uzelac
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 2017-04-01
Series:	Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Subjects:	efficiency of the legal-procedural system immediate rejection of actions and appeals manifestly unfounded calendar communication between procedural subjects contempt of court responsibility of the parties for the finding of facts reduction in the number of hearings orality immediate effectiveness of the sentence reduction of the appealable sentences hearings in appellate courts principle of the natural judge
Online Access:	https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/28487/20271

id	doaj-c032185f576e449bbe0749ba58613694
record_format	Article
spelling	doaj-c032185f576e449bbe0749ba586136942021-08-25T05:36:50ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362017-04-011810241https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2017.28487REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY?Alan Uzelac0Universidade de ZagrebThe author divides the European countries into two groups, according to the efficiency of their respective legal-procedural system. First, that of the States whose relative system is inefficient, which he calls "Mediterranean" because most of those countries are situated on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Second, that of the countries whose systems are efficient. He then seeks to identify the causes for inefficiency and proposes solutions to this problem.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/28487/20271efficiency of the legal-procedural systemimmediate rejection of actions and appeals manifestly unfoundedcalendarcommunication between procedural subjectscontempt of courtresponsibility of the parties for the finding of factsreduction in the number of hearingsoralityimmediate effectiveness of the sentencereduction of the appealable sentenceshearings in appellate courtsprinciple of the natural judge
collection	DOAJ
language	English
format	Article
sources	DOAJ
author	Alan Uzelac
spellingShingle	Alan Uzelac REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY? Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual efficiency of the legal-procedural system immediate rejection of actions and appeals manifestly unfounded calendar communication between procedural subjects contempt of court responsibility of the parties for the finding of facts reduction in the number of hearings orality immediate effectiveness of the sentence reduction of the appealable sentences hearings in appellate courts principle of the natural judge
author_facet	Alan Uzelac
author_sort	Alan Uzelac
title	REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY?
title_short	REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY?
title_full	REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY?
title_fullStr	REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY?
title_full_unstemmed	REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY?
title_sort	reforming mediterranean civil procedure: is there a need for shock therapy?
publisher	Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
series	Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
issn	1982-7636
publishDate	2017-04-01
description	The author divides the European countries into two groups, according to the efficiency of their respective legal-procedural system. First, that of the States whose relative system is inefficient, which he calls "Mediterranean" because most of those countries are situated on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Second, that of the countries whose systems are efficient. He then seeks to identify the causes for inefficiency and proposes solutions to this problem.
topic	efficiency of the legal-procedural system immediate rejection of actions and appeals manifestly unfounded calendar communication between procedural subjects contempt of court responsibility of the parties for the finding of facts reduction in the number of hearings orality immediate effectiveness of the sentence reduction of the appealable sentences hearings in appellate courts principle of the natural judge
url	https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/28487/20271
work_keys_str_mv	AT alanuzelac reformingmediterraneancivilprocedureisthereaneedforshocktherapy
_version_	1721196876172099584

REFORMING MEDITERRANEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: IS THERE A NEED FOR SHOCK THERAPY?

Similar Items