Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: d'Angelo Annelisa, Nocentini Sandro, Fazio Aldo, D'Andrea Marco, De Felice Pierino, Benassi Marcello, Strigari Lidia, Ceccatelli Alessia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-07-01
Series:Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
Online Access:http://www.jeccr.com/content/27/1/14
id doaj-c021a3cdb66649dda8075e4f9989307c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c021a3cdb66649dda8075e4f9989307c2020-11-25T00:03:09ZengBMCJournal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research1756-99662008-07-012711410.1186/1756-9966-27-14Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurementsd'Angelo AnnelisaNocentini SandroFazio AldoD'Andrea MarcoDe Felice PierinoBenassi MarcelloStrigari LidiaCeccatelli Alessia<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully measured and documented prior to administration using an activity calibrator.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Calibrator response is a function of the measurement geometry and, in particular, it depends on the syringe type and filling volume. To minimize the uncertainty associated with the measured activity of the syringe, it is necessary to calculate a calibration curve depending on filling volume for each syringe type. This curve can be obtained by fitting experimentally determined volume correction factors.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A theoretical evaluation of volume correction factors for syringes is reported for three different experimental methods. The aim is to determine the most accurate experimental method among those considered, by examining the expression of uncertainty for the correction factor. This theoretical analysis was then tested experimentally.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The agreement between the experimental data obtained in the constant activity method and gravimetric method at constant specific activity and the small associated uncertainties show the accuracy of these two procedures; while the volumetric method at constant specific activity could lead to a wrong evaluation of the correction factors.</p> http://www.jeccr.com/content/27/1/14
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author d'Angelo Annelisa
Nocentini Sandro
Fazio Aldo
D'Andrea Marco
De Felice Pierino
Benassi Marcello
Strigari Lidia
Ceccatelli Alessia
spellingShingle d'Angelo Annelisa
Nocentini Sandro
Fazio Aldo
D'Andrea Marco
De Felice Pierino
Benassi Marcello
Strigari Lidia
Ceccatelli Alessia
Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
author_facet d'Angelo Annelisa
Nocentini Sandro
Fazio Aldo
D'Andrea Marco
De Felice Pierino
Benassi Marcello
Strigari Lidia
Ceccatelli Alessia
author_sort d'Angelo Annelisa
title Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
title_short Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
title_full Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
title_fullStr Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
title_sort comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
publisher BMC
series Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
issn 1756-9966
publishDate 2008-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully measured and documented prior to administration using an activity calibrator.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Calibrator response is a function of the measurement geometry and, in particular, it depends on the syringe type and filling volume. To minimize the uncertainty associated with the measured activity of the syringe, it is necessary to calculate a calibration curve depending on filling volume for each syringe type. This curve can be obtained by fitting experimentally determined volume correction factors.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A theoretical evaluation of volume correction factors for syringes is reported for three different experimental methods. The aim is to determine the most accurate experimental method among those considered, by examining the expression of uncertainty for the correction factor. This theoretical analysis was then tested experimentally.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The agreement between the experimental data obtained in the constant activity method and gravimetric method at constant specific activity and the small associated uncertainties show the accuracy of these two procedures; while the volumetric method at constant specific activity could lead to a wrong evaluation of the correction factors.</p>
url http://www.jeccr.com/content/27/1/14
work_keys_str_mv AT dangeloannelisa comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements
AT nocentinisandro comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements
AT fazioaldo comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements
AT dandreamarco comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements
AT defelicepierino comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements
AT benassimarcello comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements
AT strigarilidia comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements
AT ceccatellialessia comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements
_version_ 1725434745190350848