Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study

Aim of the work: To evaluate the effectiveness of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison to corticosteroids clinically and electrophysiologically. Patients and methods: The study included 36 patients with idiopathic mild to moderate CTS divided into two g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esam T. Atwa, Asmaa M. Esh, Ibrahim T. Abd El Al, Yasmin M. Awad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-07-01
Series:Egyptian Rheumatologist
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116418301017
id doaj-c01ed731eba944f7be39316427f49266
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c01ed731eba944f7be39316427f492662020-11-24T20:57:46ZengElsevierEgyptian Rheumatologist1110-11642019-07-01413237241Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological studyEsam T. Atwa0Asmaa M. Esh1Ibrahim T. Abd El Al2Yasmin M. Awad3Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, EgyptClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, EgyptRheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, EgyptRheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt; Corresponding author at: Rheumatology Department, Students’ Hospital, Zagazig University, Egypt.Aim of the work: To evaluate the effectiveness of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison to corticosteroids clinically and electrophysiologically. Patients and methods: The study included 36 patients with idiopathic mild to moderate CTS divided into two groups: group I received PRP and group II received corticosteroid injections into the carpal tunnel. Nerve conduction studies were carried out, visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) were administered to patients of both groups immediately before treatment, one and three months after treatment. Results: The mean age (36.6 ± 8.8 years vs 38.5 ± 8 years), disease durations (19 ± 11 months vs 14 ± 9 months) and genders were comparable. PRP injection was significantly better than corticosteroids injection as regard VAS, symptom severity scale (SSS), functional status scale (FSS) of BCTQ as well as the distal sensory latency after one and three months of injection. There was no significant difference between both groups in other assessed parameters including distal motor latency, amplitude of compound muscle action potential, motor and sensory conduction velocities of the median nerve. There was a significant correlation between VAS and distal sensory and motor latency of the median nerve in both groups before, 1 and 3 months after injection. Conclusions: Single local injection of the PRP proved to be an effective treatment choice for CTS. PRP therapy seemed to be superior to steroid, showing more improvement clinically as regard the pain and function and electrophysiologically as regard the distal sensory latency throughout the follow-up period. Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Platelet-rich plasma, Corticosteroids, Nerve conduction studieshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116418301017
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esam T. Atwa
Asmaa M. Esh
Ibrahim T. Abd El Al
Yasmin M. Awad
spellingShingle Esam T. Atwa
Asmaa M. Esh
Ibrahim T. Abd El Al
Yasmin M. Awad
Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study
Egyptian Rheumatologist
author_facet Esam T. Atwa
Asmaa M. Esh
Ibrahim T. Abd El Al
Yasmin M. Awad
author_sort Esam T. Atwa
title Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study
title_short Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study
title_full Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study
title_fullStr Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study
title_full_unstemmed Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study
title_sort platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical and electrophysiological study
publisher Elsevier
series Egyptian Rheumatologist
issn 1110-1164
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Aim of the work: To evaluate the effectiveness of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison to corticosteroids clinically and electrophysiologically. Patients and methods: The study included 36 patients with idiopathic mild to moderate CTS divided into two groups: group I received PRP and group II received corticosteroid injections into the carpal tunnel. Nerve conduction studies were carried out, visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) were administered to patients of both groups immediately before treatment, one and three months after treatment. Results: The mean age (36.6 ± 8.8 years vs 38.5 ± 8 years), disease durations (19 ± 11 months vs 14 ± 9 months) and genders were comparable. PRP injection was significantly better than corticosteroids injection as regard VAS, symptom severity scale (SSS), functional status scale (FSS) of BCTQ as well as the distal sensory latency after one and three months of injection. There was no significant difference between both groups in other assessed parameters including distal motor latency, amplitude of compound muscle action potential, motor and sensory conduction velocities of the median nerve. There was a significant correlation between VAS and distal sensory and motor latency of the median nerve in both groups before, 1 and 3 months after injection. Conclusions: Single local injection of the PRP proved to be an effective treatment choice for CTS. PRP therapy seemed to be superior to steroid, showing more improvement clinically as regard the pain and function and electrophysiologically as regard the distal sensory latency throughout the follow-up period. Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Platelet-rich plasma, Corticosteroids, Nerve conduction studies
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116418301017
work_keys_str_mv AT esamtatwa plateletrichplasmaversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforcarpaltunnelsyndromeclinicalandelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT asmaamesh plateletrichplasmaversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforcarpaltunnelsyndromeclinicalandelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT ibrahimtabdelal plateletrichplasmaversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforcarpaltunnelsyndromeclinicalandelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT yasminmawad plateletrichplasmaversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforcarpaltunnelsyndromeclinicalandelectrophysiologicalstudy
_version_ 1716787566209925120