Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study
Aim of the work: To evaluate the effectiveness of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison to corticosteroids clinically and electrophysiologically. Patients and methods: The study included 36 patients with idiopathic mild to moderate CTS divided into two g...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Egyptian Rheumatologist |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116418301017 |
id |
doaj-c01ed731eba944f7be39316427f49266 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c01ed731eba944f7be39316427f492662020-11-24T20:57:46ZengElsevierEgyptian Rheumatologist1110-11642019-07-01413237241Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological studyEsam T. Atwa0Asmaa M. Esh1Ibrahim T. Abd El Al2Yasmin M. Awad3Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, EgyptClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, EgyptRheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, EgyptRheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt; Corresponding author at: Rheumatology Department, Students’ Hospital, Zagazig University, Egypt.Aim of the work: To evaluate the effectiveness of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison to corticosteroids clinically and electrophysiologically. Patients and methods: The study included 36 patients with idiopathic mild to moderate CTS divided into two groups: group I received PRP and group II received corticosteroid injections into the carpal tunnel. Nerve conduction studies were carried out, visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) were administered to patients of both groups immediately before treatment, one and three months after treatment. Results: The mean age (36.6 ± 8.8 years vs 38.5 ± 8 years), disease durations (19 ± 11 months vs 14 ± 9 months) and genders were comparable. PRP injection was significantly better than corticosteroids injection as regard VAS, symptom severity scale (SSS), functional status scale (FSS) of BCTQ as well as the distal sensory latency after one and three months of injection. There was no significant difference between both groups in other assessed parameters including distal motor latency, amplitude of compound muscle action potential, motor and sensory conduction velocities of the median nerve. There was a significant correlation between VAS and distal sensory and motor latency of the median nerve in both groups before, 1 and 3 months after injection. Conclusions: Single local injection of the PRP proved to be an effective treatment choice for CTS. PRP therapy seemed to be superior to steroid, showing more improvement clinically as regard the pain and function and electrophysiologically as regard the distal sensory latency throughout the follow-up period. Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Platelet-rich plasma, Corticosteroids, Nerve conduction studieshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116418301017 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Esam T. Atwa Asmaa M. Esh Ibrahim T. Abd El Al Yasmin M. Awad |
spellingShingle |
Esam T. Atwa Asmaa M. Esh Ibrahim T. Abd El Al Yasmin M. Awad Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study Egyptian Rheumatologist |
author_facet |
Esam T. Atwa Asmaa M. Esh Ibrahim T. Abd El Al Yasmin M. Awad |
author_sort |
Esam T. Atwa |
title |
Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study |
title_short |
Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study |
title_full |
Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study |
title_fullStr |
Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological study |
title_sort |
platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical and electrophysiological study |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Egyptian Rheumatologist |
issn |
1110-1164 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Aim of the work: To evaluate the effectiveness of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison to corticosteroids clinically and electrophysiologically. Patients and methods: The study included 36 patients with idiopathic mild to moderate CTS divided into two groups: group I received PRP and group II received corticosteroid injections into the carpal tunnel. Nerve conduction studies were carried out, visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) were administered to patients of both groups immediately before treatment, one and three months after treatment. Results: The mean age (36.6 ± 8.8 years vs 38.5 ± 8 years), disease durations (19 ± 11 months vs 14 ± 9 months) and genders were comparable. PRP injection was significantly better than corticosteroids injection as regard VAS, symptom severity scale (SSS), functional status scale (FSS) of BCTQ as well as the distal sensory latency after one and three months of injection. There was no significant difference between both groups in other assessed parameters including distal motor latency, amplitude of compound muscle action potential, motor and sensory conduction velocities of the median nerve. There was a significant correlation between VAS and distal sensory and motor latency of the median nerve in both groups before, 1 and 3 months after injection. Conclusions: Single local injection of the PRP proved to be an effective treatment choice for CTS. PRP therapy seemed to be superior to steroid, showing more improvement clinically as regard the pain and function and electrophysiologically as regard the distal sensory latency throughout the follow-up period. Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Platelet-rich plasma, Corticosteroids, Nerve conduction studies |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110116418301017 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT esamtatwa plateletrichplasmaversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforcarpaltunnelsyndromeclinicalandelectrophysiologicalstudy AT asmaamesh plateletrichplasmaversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforcarpaltunnelsyndromeclinicalandelectrophysiologicalstudy AT ibrahimtabdelal plateletrichplasmaversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforcarpaltunnelsyndromeclinicalandelectrophysiologicalstudy AT yasminmawad plateletrichplasmaversuscorticosteroidinjectionsforcarpaltunnelsyndromeclinicalandelectrophysiologicalstudy |
_version_ |
1716787566209925120 |