Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes

Multivessel coronary artery disease is more often treated either with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting. The advent of drug-eluting stent (DES) has changed the revascularization strategy, and caused an increase in the use of DES in multiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanaiya Panchal, Snehal Patel, Parloop Bhatt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Advances in Pharmacological Sciences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/679013
id doaj-c01a14bd674d4b33928cc54369e9ea4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c01a14bd674d4b33928cc54369e9ea4f2020-11-25T03:14:07ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Pharmacological Sciences1687-63341687-63422012-01-01201210.1155/2012/679013679013Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Cost Effectiveness and Clinical OutcomesKanaiya Panchal0Snehal Patel1Parloop Bhatt2Department of Pharmacology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 382 481, IndiaDepartment of Pharmacology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 382 481, IndiaDepartment of Pharmacology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009, IndiaMultivessel coronary artery disease is more often treated either with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting. The advent of drug-eluting stent (DES) has changed the revascularization strategy, and caused an increase in the use of DES in multivessel disease (MVD), with reduced rate of repeat revascularization compared to conventional bare metal stent. The comparative studies of DES-PCI over CABG have shown comparable safety; however, the rate of major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events and repeat revascularization was significantly higher with DES-PCI at long term. In diabetic patients with MVD, concern of repeat revascularization with DES-PCI is persistent. More recent, one-year economic outcomes have reported that the CABG is favored among patients with high angiographic complexity. The higher rate of repeat revascularization with DES-PCI in MVD would lead to increased economic burden on patient at long term besides bearing high cost of DES. In diabetic MVD patients, CABG is associated with having better clinical outcomes and being more cost-effective approach when compared to DES-PCI at long term.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/679013
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kanaiya Panchal
Snehal Patel
Parloop Bhatt
spellingShingle Kanaiya Panchal
Snehal Patel
Parloop Bhatt
Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes
Advances in Pharmacological Sciences
author_facet Kanaiya Panchal
Snehal Patel
Parloop Bhatt
author_sort Kanaiya Panchal
title Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes
title_short Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes
title_full Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Drug-Eluting Stents in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes
title_sort drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease: cost effectiveness and clinical outcomes
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Pharmacological Sciences
issn 1687-6334
1687-6342
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Multivessel coronary artery disease is more often treated either with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting. The advent of drug-eluting stent (DES) has changed the revascularization strategy, and caused an increase in the use of DES in multivessel disease (MVD), with reduced rate of repeat revascularization compared to conventional bare metal stent. The comparative studies of DES-PCI over CABG have shown comparable safety; however, the rate of major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events and repeat revascularization was significantly higher with DES-PCI at long term. In diabetic patients with MVD, concern of repeat revascularization with DES-PCI is persistent. More recent, one-year economic outcomes have reported that the CABG is favored among patients with high angiographic complexity. The higher rate of repeat revascularization with DES-PCI in MVD would lead to increased economic burden on patient at long term besides bearing high cost of DES. In diabetic MVD patients, CABG is associated with having better clinical outcomes and being more cost-effective approach when compared to DES-PCI at long term.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/679013
work_keys_str_mv AT kanaiyapanchal drugelutingstentsinmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasecosteffectivenessandclinicaloutcomes
AT snehalpatel drugelutingstentsinmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasecosteffectivenessandclinicaloutcomes
AT parloopbhatt drugelutingstentsinmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasecosteffectivenessandclinicaloutcomes
_version_ 1724644425595879424