How to Assess the Epistemic Wrongness of Sponsorship Bias? The Case of Manufactured Certainty
Although the impact of so-called “sponsorship bias” has been the subject of increased attention in the philosophy of science, what exactly constitutes its epistemic wrongness is still debated. In this paper, I will argue that neither evidential accounts nor social–epistemological accounts can fully...
Main Author: | Jon Leefmann |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2021.599909/full |
Similar Items
-
In how many ways may a health research go wrong?
by: Nagesh Lakshminarayan
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Harms and Wrongs in Epistemic Practice
Published: (2018) -
Wittgenstein and Certainty
by: Pan, Mengqi
Published: (2015) -
On Epistemic Agency
by: Ahlstrom, Kristoffer Hans
Published: (2010) -
Subjectivity and Fallibility in the Instrumental and Epistemic Defenses of a "Right to Do Wrong"
by: Wright, Thomas
Published: (2010)