Spatial Response of Near-Surface Soil Water Contents to Newly Imposed Soil Management

Near-surface soil water content (SWC) and its spatial patterns are important for landscape hydrological responses to precipitation as well as our ability to remotely sense and model such responses. Our objective was to measure and evaluate near-surface SWC semivariograms of agricultural fields with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron L. M. Daigh, Upasana Ghosh, Jodi DeJong-Hughes, Robert Horton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-08-01
Series:Agricultural & Environmental Letters
Online Access:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ael/articles/3/1/180032
id doaj-c0140f1100fb46ebb01f02659c7ad8bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0140f1100fb46ebb01f02659c7ad8bc2020-11-25T02:56:43ZengWileyAgricultural & Environmental Letters2471-96252018-08-013110.2134/ael2018.06.0032Spatial Response of Near-Surface Soil Water Contents to Newly Imposed Soil ManagementAaron L. M. DaighUpasana GhoshJodi DeJong-HughesRobert HortonNear-surface soil water content (SWC) and its spatial patterns are important for landscape hydrological responses to precipitation as well as our ability to remotely sense and model such responses. Our objective was to measure and evaluate near-surface SWC semivariograms of agricultural fields with newly imposed (i.e., <2 yr) side-by-side soil and residue management practices (i.e., reduced tillage systems and cover crops) in the midwestern United States. Range parameters were consistently smaller when cover crops were planted (20–25 m less) and tillage area and/or intensity was reduced (12–27 m less) compared with no cover crop and chisel plowing, respectively, except in a clayey Vertisol. Nugget and sill parameters did not have consistent trends across soil management practices or sites. These data, although brief and preliminary in scope, provide clear proof of concept that spatial pattern shifts can be clearly detected in newly imposed soil-management systems even though differences in SWC means are not always evident.https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ael/articles/3/1/180032
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aaron L. M. Daigh
Upasana Ghosh
Jodi DeJong-Hughes
Robert Horton
spellingShingle Aaron L. M. Daigh
Upasana Ghosh
Jodi DeJong-Hughes
Robert Horton
Spatial Response of Near-Surface Soil Water Contents to Newly Imposed Soil Management
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
author_facet Aaron L. M. Daigh
Upasana Ghosh
Jodi DeJong-Hughes
Robert Horton
author_sort Aaron L. M. Daigh
title Spatial Response of Near-Surface Soil Water Contents to Newly Imposed Soil Management
title_short Spatial Response of Near-Surface Soil Water Contents to Newly Imposed Soil Management
title_full Spatial Response of Near-Surface Soil Water Contents to Newly Imposed Soil Management
title_fullStr Spatial Response of Near-Surface Soil Water Contents to Newly Imposed Soil Management
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Response of Near-Surface Soil Water Contents to Newly Imposed Soil Management
title_sort spatial response of near-surface soil water contents to newly imposed soil management
publisher Wiley
series Agricultural & Environmental Letters
issn 2471-9625
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Near-surface soil water content (SWC) and its spatial patterns are important for landscape hydrological responses to precipitation as well as our ability to remotely sense and model such responses. Our objective was to measure and evaluate near-surface SWC semivariograms of agricultural fields with newly imposed (i.e., <2 yr) side-by-side soil and residue management practices (i.e., reduced tillage systems and cover crops) in the midwestern United States. Range parameters were consistently smaller when cover crops were planted (20–25 m less) and tillage area and/or intensity was reduced (12–27 m less) compared with no cover crop and chisel plowing, respectively, except in a clayey Vertisol. Nugget and sill parameters did not have consistent trends across soil management practices or sites. These data, although brief and preliminary in scope, provide clear proof of concept that spatial pattern shifts can be clearly detected in newly imposed soil-management systems even though differences in SWC means are not always evident.
url https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ael/articles/3/1/180032
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronlmdaigh spatialresponseofnearsurfacesoilwatercontentstonewlyimposedsoilmanagement
AT upasanaghosh spatialresponseofnearsurfacesoilwatercontentstonewlyimposedsoilmanagement
AT jodidejonghughes spatialresponseofnearsurfacesoilwatercontentstonewlyimposedsoilmanagement
AT roberthorton spatialresponseofnearsurfacesoilwatercontentstonewlyimposedsoilmanagement
_version_ 1724712528077914112