Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject.

The object of analysis in the industrial organization theory remains debatable. A comparative approach applied to solve the problem in the study shows that the object in the industrial organization theory is conventionally interpreted as different forms of applied, i. e. industrial, microeconomics....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yury Vasilievich Taranukha
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Perm State University 2021-04-01
Series:Вестник Пермского университета: Серия Экономика
Online Access:http://economics.psu.ru/index.php/econ/article/view/353
id doaj-c00cb9fad7224d42b727d9deda7b6e08
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c00cb9fad7224d42b727d9deda7b6e082021-05-26T19:16:55ZrusPerm State UniversityВестник Пермского университета: Серия Экономика1994-99602021-04-0116151810.17072/1994-9960-2021-1-5-18353Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject.Yury Vasilievich Taranukha0Московский государственный университет имени М.В. ЛомоносоваThe object of analysis in the industrial organization theory remains debatable. A comparative approach applied to solve the problem in the study shows that the object in the industrial organization theory is conventionally interpreted as different forms of applied, i. e. industrial, microeconomics. The author views industrial market as a structural component of economy with its own laws of development. If the object of analysis in the industrial organization theory is the industry itself, then the subject should be focused on studying the driving forces which determine the direction of its development. The objects of analysis in the current industrial markets theory and in microeconomic analysis match due to their common methodology – the statistical analysis. Given the industry’s dynamic nature, it would be the most appropriate to reproduce the approach which combines systematic and dynamic methods. This approach demonstrates that industry’s evolution is driven by the resolution of contradictions between the firm and market conditions. The direct cause of market changes are shown to be the changes in the productive forces, and the direct driving force is the firm. While changing, the firm creates new market conditions which accumulate and trigger qualitative transformations of the market, forcing it to adapt to the changes in a new way. An on-going contradiction between them becomes the engine of development for both the industry and the firm. This interpretation of the object in the industrial organization theory and the reproduced methodology used provide ample opportunities for solving two theoretically and pragmatically crucial problems – defining the causes and factors of the industrial markets development, and defining the patterns in product markets development, which allows us to predict the process of market evolution. Further analysis of the internal development will reveal the evolutionary nature of the industries and markets and give some insights into the nature of their interaction with the society’s productive forces and public institutes being the reflections of the production relationships.http://economics.psu.ru/index.php/econ/article/view/353
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yury Vasilievich Taranukha
spellingShingle Yury Vasilievich Taranukha
Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject.
Вестник Пермского университета: Серия Экономика
author_facet Yury Vasilievich Taranukha
author_sort Yury Vasilievich Taranukha
title Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject.
title_short Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject.
title_full Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject.
title_fullStr Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject.
title_full_unstemmed Theory of industrial organization: The problem of defining the subject.
title_sort theory of industrial organization: the problem of defining the subject.
publisher Perm State University
series Вестник Пермского университета: Серия Экономика
issn 1994-9960
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The object of analysis in the industrial organization theory remains debatable. A comparative approach applied to solve the problem in the study shows that the object in the industrial organization theory is conventionally interpreted as different forms of applied, i. e. industrial, microeconomics. The author views industrial market as a structural component of economy with its own laws of development. If the object of analysis in the industrial organization theory is the industry itself, then the subject should be focused on studying the driving forces which determine the direction of its development. The objects of analysis in the current industrial markets theory and in microeconomic analysis match due to their common methodology – the statistical analysis. Given the industry’s dynamic nature, it would be the most appropriate to reproduce the approach which combines systematic and dynamic methods. This approach demonstrates that industry’s evolution is driven by the resolution of contradictions between the firm and market conditions. The direct cause of market changes are shown to be the changes in the productive forces, and the direct driving force is the firm. While changing, the firm creates new market conditions which accumulate and trigger qualitative transformations of the market, forcing it to adapt to the changes in a new way. An on-going contradiction between them becomes the engine of development for both the industry and the firm. This interpretation of the object in the industrial organization theory and the reproduced methodology used provide ample opportunities for solving two theoretically and pragmatically crucial problems – defining the causes and factors of the industrial markets development, and defining the patterns in product markets development, which allows us to predict the process of market evolution. Further analysis of the internal development will reveal the evolutionary nature of the industries and markets and give some insights into the nature of their interaction with the society’s productive forces and public institutes being the reflections of the production relationships.
url http://economics.psu.ru/index.php/econ/article/view/353
work_keys_str_mv AT yuryvasilievichtaranukha theoryofindustrialorganizationtheproblemofdefiningthesubject
_version_ 1721426232222941184