Comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strength

Some results of numerical experiments of testing concrete cubes and prisms on unconfined compression, and the comparison of results obtained with experimental and specified data, are presented in the article. When performing calculations of structures in a nonlinear setting, it is very important to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mkrtychev Oleg, Sidorov Dmitriy, Bulushev Sergey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711700123
id doaj-c0070da93ac24cfc8720dc3907528446
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0070da93ac24cfc8720dc39075284462021-03-02T09:23:59ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2017-01-011170012310.1051/matecconf/201711700123matecconf_rsp2017_00123Comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strengthMkrtychev Oleg0Sidorov Dmitriy1Bulushev Sergey2Moscow state university of civil engineeringMoscow state university of civil engineeringMoscow state university of civil engineeringSome results of numerical experiments of testing concrete cubes and prisms on unconfined compression, and the comparison of results obtained with experimental and specified data, are presented in the article. When performing calculations of structures in a nonlinear setting, it is very important to choose adequate deformation diagrams or material models. Because of the fact that there are no instructions how to use the diagrams of concrete and armature deformation in collaboration of steel and concrete, the simulation of reinforced concrete structures by finite elements of the same type without any assumptions is impossible. Numerical experiments have been performed in the LS-DYNA software package. This software package allows simulating the collaboration of concrete and steeling with the help of three-dimensional (for concrete) and rod (for the reinforcement) finite elements. As samples, a cube and a prism with dimensions of 150×150×150 mm and 150×150×600 mm, respectively, have been taken. The samples are simulated by solid finite elements. For the simulation of concrete, the non-linear CSCM (Continuous Surface Cap Model) material is used. The tests were carried out with samples of the following classes of concrete as for cylinder compressive strength: C12, C16, C20, C25, C30, C35. This corresponds to the following classes of cube compression strength: B15, B20, B25, B30, B37, B45. The tests have been carried out considering the friction coefficients between the plates of a testing machine, and a sample. The performed researches have shown that the destruction nature of the samples in a numerical experiment corresponds to the failure nature in real tests. The investigated model of CSCM concrete can be used in the calculation of concrete and reinforced concrete structures with acceptable accuracy for main classes of concrete.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711700123
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mkrtychev Oleg
Sidorov Dmitriy
Bulushev Sergey
spellingShingle Mkrtychev Oleg
Sidorov Dmitriy
Bulushev Sergey
Comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strength
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Mkrtychev Oleg
Sidorov Dmitriy
Bulushev Sergey
author_sort Mkrtychev Oleg
title Comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strength
title_short Comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strength
title_full Comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strength
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strength
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strength
title_sort comparative analysis of results from experimental and numerical studies on concrete strength
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Some results of numerical experiments of testing concrete cubes and prisms on unconfined compression, and the comparison of results obtained with experimental and specified data, are presented in the article. When performing calculations of structures in a nonlinear setting, it is very important to choose adequate deformation diagrams or material models. Because of the fact that there are no instructions how to use the diagrams of concrete and armature deformation in collaboration of steel and concrete, the simulation of reinforced concrete structures by finite elements of the same type without any assumptions is impossible. Numerical experiments have been performed in the LS-DYNA software package. This software package allows simulating the collaboration of concrete and steeling with the help of three-dimensional (for concrete) and rod (for the reinforcement) finite elements. As samples, a cube and a prism with dimensions of 150×150×150 mm and 150×150×600 mm, respectively, have been taken. The samples are simulated by solid finite elements. For the simulation of concrete, the non-linear CSCM (Continuous Surface Cap Model) material is used. The tests were carried out with samples of the following classes of concrete as for cylinder compressive strength: C12, C16, C20, C25, C30, C35. This corresponds to the following classes of cube compression strength: B15, B20, B25, B30, B37, B45. The tests have been carried out considering the friction coefficients between the plates of a testing machine, and a sample. The performed researches have shown that the destruction nature of the samples in a numerical experiment corresponds to the failure nature in real tests. The investigated model of CSCM concrete can be used in the calculation of concrete and reinforced concrete structures with acceptable accuracy for main classes of concrete.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201711700123
work_keys_str_mv AT mkrtychevoleg comparativeanalysisofresultsfromexperimentalandnumericalstudiesonconcretestrength
AT sidorovdmitriy comparativeanalysisofresultsfromexperimentalandnumericalstudiesonconcretestrength
AT bulushevsergey comparativeanalysisofresultsfromexperimentalandnumericalstudiesonconcretestrength
_version_ 1724239554123137024