Surgical resection versus stereotactic body radiation therapy in early stage bronchopulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

• Main Authors: Herman Lo, Stephen Abel, Gene Finley, Benny Weksler, Athanasios Colonias, Rodney E. Wegner
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020-02-01
• Series: Thoracic Cancer
• Subjects: Bronchopulmonary; large cell tumor neuroendocrine tumor; lobectomy; pneumonectomy; stereotactic body radiation therapy
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13260

Background Surgery is the standard of care for early stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is another definitive treatment option for those patients who have not been treated surgically. Comparison of approaches is being explored in NSCLC, but has yet to be compared exclusively in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to conduct such a comparison. Methods We accessed the NCDB for patients with LCNEC who were recorded as having lung stage T1‐2N0M0 treated with lobectomy/pneumonectomy or SBRT. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of SBRT. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival propensity matching and account for indication bias. Results A total of 3209 patients met the criteria, of which 238 (7%) received SBRT. The median SBRT dose was 50 Gy (48–60) in four fractions (3–5). Predictors of SBRT were age >68, T1 disease, and most recent year of treatment. Predictors of survival were younger age, surgical treatment, female sex, and T1 disease. After propensity matching, median survival was 57 months versus 35 months in favor of surgical resection, P < 0.0001. Conclusion Surgical resection in comparison to SBRT has improved survival for patients with early stage LCNEC of the lung. SBRT represents a viable treatment alternative for those patients who do not meet the criteria for surgery.