Transcendence Un-Extra-Ordinaire: Bringing the Atheistic I Down to Earth

I examine challenges to images of a personal god definitive for normatively policed theism (often called “traditional theism”), questioning whether a subject can be conscious of a transcendent being. I examine the challenges to show that disappointment with such images calls for rethinking terms lik...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nathan Eric Dickman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-12-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/1/4
id doaj-bffa97454c8b4af28d2182df8c7b265d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bffa97454c8b4af28d2182df8c7b265d2020-11-24T21:06:14ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442016-12-0181410.3390/rel8010004rel8010004Transcendence Un-Extra-Ordinaire: Bringing the Atheistic I Down to EarthNathan Eric Dickman0Department of Religion and Philosophy, Young Harris College, Young Harris, GA 30582, USAI examine challenges to images of a personal god definitive for normatively policed theism (often called “traditional theism”), questioning whether a subject can be conscious of a transcendent being. I examine the challenges to show that disappointment with such images calls for rethinking terms like “transcendence” in horizontal rather than vertical registers. Through this, I indicate an irony in yearning for transcendence, one in which there is movement toward—rather than beyond—the utterly ordinary. We will see that such un-extra-ordinary transcendence makes a difference once difference is no longer determined under the hegemony of what Levinas calls “the atheistic I.” I bring together resources from feminist philosophies and Asian religions both to elaborate on the nature of the atheistic I and to rehabilitate a redeeming appreciation of the ordinary. My hope is to ameliorate disempowered estrangement by indicating ways the ordinary generates, not inhibits, becoming. However, my broader intent is to contribute to shifting sands in contemporary philosophy of religion due to recent calls for diversifying the field by including multiple religions, questioning the centrality of belief, and engaging multiple methods relevant in religious studies.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/1/4traditional theismtranscendenceLevinasIrigarayFeuerbachmetaphorRicoeurZhuangzisemanticsthe ordinary
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathan Eric Dickman
spellingShingle Nathan Eric Dickman
Transcendence Un-Extra-Ordinaire: Bringing the Atheistic I Down to Earth
Religions
traditional theism
transcendence
Levinas
Irigaray
Feuerbach
metaphor
Ricoeur
Zhuangzi
semantics
the ordinary
author_facet Nathan Eric Dickman
author_sort Nathan Eric Dickman
title Transcendence Un-Extra-Ordinaire: Bringing the Atheistic I Down to Earth
title_short Transcendence Un-Extra-Ordinaire: Bringing the Atheistic I Down to Earth
title_full Transcendence Un-Extra-Ordinaire: Bringing the Atheistic I Down to Earth
title_fullStr Transcendence Un-Extra-Ordinaire: Bringing the Atheistic I Down to Earth
title_full_unstemmed Transcendence Un-Extra-Ordinaire: Bringing the Atheistic I Down to Earth
title_sort transcendence un-extra-ordinaire: bringing the atheistic i down to earth
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2016-12-01
description I examine challenges to images of a personal god definitive for normatively policed theism (often called “traditional theism”), questioning whether a subject can be conscious of a transcendent being. I examine the challenges to show that disappointment with such images calls for rethinking terms like “transcendence” in horizontal rather than vertical registers. Through this, I indicate an irony in yearning for transcendence, one in which there is movement toward—rather than beyond—the utterly ordinary. We will see that such un-extra-ordinary transcendence makes a difference once difference is no longer determined under the hegemony of what Levinas calls “the atheistic I.” I bring together resources from feminist philosophies and Asian religions both to elaborate on the nature of the atheistic I and to rehabilitate a redeeming appreciation of the ordinary. My hope is to ameliorate disempowered estrangement by indicating ways the ordinary generates, not inhibits, becoming. However, my broader intent is to contribute to shifting sands in contemporary philosophy of religion due to recent calls for diversifying the field by including multiple religions, questioning the centrality of belief, and engaging multiple methods relevant in religious studies.
topic traditional theism
transcendence
Levinas
Irigaray
Feuerbach
metaphor
Ricoeur
Zhuangzi
semantics
the ordinary
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanericdickman transcendenceunextraordinairebringingtheatheisticidowntoearth
_version_ 1716766236727050240